Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V9, D5100 stock arrived !

views
     
vikingw2k
post Apr 24 2011, 10:06 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(razuryza @ Apr 24 2011, 05:36 AM)
i'm using d700+16-35mm for ages... no problemo.. feel just nize  whistling.gif
for ages? Biar betul, I thought you only upgraded to D700 for not even a year plus? biggrin.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 24 2011, 10:57 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 24 2011, 10:54 AM)
I put everything except my speedlights. Big is better.
*
Any pics of ya 88L drybox? Wanna see how many stuff you can chuck inside. I'm still thinking whether to get one or live with my BBQ cooler box. LuLz. biggrin.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 11:16 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 25 2011, 11:08 AM)

I don't think he's that close in... 50mm on crop sensor is roughly the same as 85mm on FF.
*
50mm on cropped sensor is roughly the same as 85mm on FF, having said so, the MFD difference between these 2 lenses is pretty significant.

50mm f1.4 - 0.45 metre
85mm f1.4 - 0.85 metre

So it affects the DOF too. smile.gif


Added on April 25, 2011, 11:17 am
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 25 2011, 11:16 AM)
Well, his shot lseems little more closer, and if he focus and recompose, it will affect his focus plane. Finally, he might also have moved a little probably before pressing the shutter.

anyway, lol, we're like playing detective or troubleshooting, haha.  just my guess lah, there can be many possibilities, only the person knows best.
*
Refer to my post above. The MFD shorter MFD on 50mm f1.4 allows him to go closer smile.gif

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Apr 25 2011, 11:17 AM
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 11:53 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 25 2011, 11:42 AM)
But when obtaining similar field of view, 50mm on DX versus 85mm on FF.

Let's say 85mm stands 1 meter away from focus point, the 50mm would be roughly 1 meter away too right? The dof for 85m would be more shallow isn't it due to focal length.
*
Not necessary, for instance,

85mm f1.4 on full frame body and you are 1 metre away from the subject.
50mm f1.4 on cropped body and you are 1 metre away from the subject.

If you ignore the minor differences, you should be able to get the same field of view, but when both steps closer by half a metre

85mm f1.4 on full frame body and you are 0.5 metre away from the subject (you get OOF shot due to you went beyond the MFD)
50mm f1.4 on cropped body and you are 0.5 metre away from the subject. (you get a narrower DOF due to the nearer the subject's distance to you, the narrower the DOF except you go beyond the MFD)

smile.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 12:19 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 25 2011, 12:04 PM)
Understood, but I was comparing when both lens are still within focus distance. If beyond MFD no point comparing since can't even get a lock on the focus already.
*
No point comparing both within same distance cause everyone knows obviously the 85mm f1.4 on full frame has a shallower DOF compared to 50mm f1.4 on cropped sensor body.

The reason I highlighted that MFD does affect too cause Andy214 was saying that the picture above appeared to be taken very close, so high chances the shooter went very close to the subject considering 50mm f1.4's MFD is 0.45metre allowing the shooter to go very very close. smile.gif

QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 25 2011, 12:04 PM)
I think to help identify the problem of the picture, it doesnm't really matter if his picture have more shallow DOF than yours or vice versa. The key point here is, there is shallow DOF. For the picture that I see, I would say the DOF is shallow since its considered close up, and we're also nolt sure if he uses focus recompose technique, if yes, this further cause the problem.
Even if he did not focus and recompose, it can be he focus and lock and during framing and waiting for the moment, he move or the subject moved shifting the focus plane.
As I said, there can be many reasons, only the person knows best. From the picture, what I can say is there is shallow DOF since its close up, the rest, it depends on the technique and how the shot was taken.
*
I see that we are tuning the same channel biggrin.gif

vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 12:29 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(geekster129 @ Apr 25 2011, 12:25 PM)
I think the subject moving around, shifting the focus plane may sound reasonable, especially when you are indirectly shooting her, and she will just move her face to other photogs on and off.
*
Yes and it's one of the common factor that causes you to get OOF shots smile.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 12:33 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(geekster129 @ Apr 25 2011, 12:30 PM)
That's why proper communication is important. Sometimes, I will confirm my focus lock few times when the model looked at me. Tit tit tit few times if I got the time luxury, this will sometimes guarantee really tack sharp focus, even on my kitlens. tongue.gif
*
Some inexperienced model will move their body a tad when they pose without knowing this is bad for the photogs who just locked their focus.
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 12:46 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(geekster129 @ Apr 25 2011, 12:38 PM)
PC Fair I would care less. OOF shots will go straight to the recycle bin.

But for outdoor portrait shooting where I can talk to my models, and if I want to achieve certain shots, I would tell her, "OK, look at me, I focus on your eyes... but don't move". If she moves, then I have to educate/coach her not to move much. So sometimes, it requires a few takes before I got that perfect shot with perfect focus especially if it's a complicated pose which involves movement and dynamics. It worth the effort. smile.gif
*
Hence effective communication is one of the key! biggrin.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 25 2011, 11:30 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



Best way shoot RAW and adjust later.
vikingw2k
post Apr 26 2011, 03:25 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(scotty @ Apr 26 2011, 03:02 AM)
some pic before i sleep. pls comment. i newbie.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


no edit/ just resize and add frame smile.gif
*
I see Katak Beku sad.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 26 2011, 09:19 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(razuryza @ Apr 25 2011, 10:38 PM)
thumbup.gif
*
QUOTE(razuryza @ Apr 24 2011, 07:44 AM)
really kopitiam post
*
No offense but what's the difference between you and them? smile.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 26 2011, 08:43 AM)

So what's a 'Katak Beku'?  hmm.gif
*
user posted image

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Apr 26 2011, 09:20 AM
vikingw2k
post Apr 26 2011, 03:21 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 26 2011, 09:29 AM)
So you're not seeing that instead of the photo... cause on my side I'm able to see the photo that's why was wondering what's the Katak Beku referring to  laugh.gif Thanks for the clarification.

Thought you mentioned her expression like katak beku tongue.gif
*
Nah, now I'm able to view unker scotty's pics by clicking on them. I too registered an imageshack account but the problem still persists sad.gif

QUOTE(stsh90 @ Apr 26 2011, 10:34 AM)
I was actually looking for a real frozen frog in the picture of the girl.  doh.gif  laugh.gif
*
aduh... sweat.gif

QUOTE(0168257061 @ Apr 26 2011, 11:01 AM)
I wonder why some of the imageshack I can see, some cant?
the scotty wan i can, viking wan i cant sad.gif
*
LuLz of the day. You are actually seeing mine cause I posted a real frozen frog there. tongue.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 26 2011, 11:05 AM)
Viking posted the frozen frog isn't it o_O
*

biggrin.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 26 2011, 07:04 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Agito666 @ Apr 26 2011, 06:09 PM)
nah 50mm f/1.8
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


blush.gif
*
nah 50mm f2.5

user posted image
Agnes by VK'z Gallery, on Flickr

blush.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 27 2011, 02:02 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 26 2011, 07:48 PM)
Actually that photo of Elise taken at 1.0 more interesting =D
*
uik, that one havent post in LYN tongue.gif

QUOTE(Irbean @ Apr 27 2011, 01:42 AM)
ehem ehem..voyager..
make it fast..so that mr Eddy can lego his voyager..
*
Me just bought Rapid 7, damn nice to use. Launched it during the recent PC Fair. My only whine is changing lens is a tad harder compared to normal neck strap. smile.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 27 2011, 04:29 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Irbean @ Apr 27 2011, 03:09 AM)
let say body+grip + 24-70 attached, with the BR RS7, is it comfortable? just worried my gear hanging on my side upside down..and quite risky i think..is it so?
*
My setup during PC Fair,
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II + BG-E6 loaded with 2 batts
- Canon EF 24L, 35L, 50L, 15FE, S12-24
- Canon 580exII Speedlite with diffuser
- Kirk 5D2 plate

I screw the RS7 to my Kirk plate and let it move freely during PC Fair and didn't face any issue except changing lens is slightly invonvenient or probably I'm still not used to it. Yes, it's pretty comfy compared to normal neck strap but you have to be careful that your body and lens don't bang here and there when you move around. biggrin.gif
vikingw2k
post Apr 27 2011, 10:33 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Bliz @ Apr 27 2011, 10:26 AM)
RS4 is around Rm208, i guess shashinki.com is selling at one of the lowest price, RS7 is around RM228.. The only reason i didnt get the RS7 was the stupid buckle at the back of the strap which can dismount the strap  doh.gif , want to steal your camera also easy, just unbuckle it from the back and there it goes  yawn.gif
*
Not really, there's a safety lock before you can buckle it off smile.gif
vikingw2k
post May 22 2011, 02:22 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(vearn27 @ May 22 2011, 11:49 AM)
Yeah, same goes with me. Will see other photos or perhaps more reviews to come. My budget at the moment only allow me to go for this lens sad.gif

Should or shouldn't I consider the Sigmalux? However, 35mm seems to be better option for an all-rounder prime lens.
*
You might wanna consider getting yourself a Siggy 30mm f1.4 HSM. Ideal for cropped sensor bodies. smile.gif
vikingw2k
post May 25 2011, 02:40 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(hidden830726 @ May 25 2011, 02:36 PM)
K I’ve learnt to use the manual mode, and adjust the bar to “0” to get picture with correct exposure.

But when the place get too dark, e.g. sometimes in house, or at night, I can’t follow the bar right?

So how do I gauge whether my picture with correct exposure or not?
*
Trial & Error. Sometimes you just can't solely rely on that bar thingy. smile.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0466sec    2.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:02 AM