
_DSC0151 by IsePunye, on Flickr
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V9, D5100 stock arrived !
|
|
May 4 2011, 02:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2011, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(sueannee @ May 4 2011, 03:34 PM) pp lo. i also sux at vertical lineAdded on May 4, 2011, 11:41 pm QUOTE(sueannee @ May 4 2011, 03:58 PM) eventho u were women, doesnt mean u dont have to read the manualAdded on May 4, 2011, 11:42 pm QUOTE(0168257061 @ May 4 2011, 10:55 PM) fake or not nvm but at least get better built of fake loh when talk about bags, people concern about the padding not about the outside.i also using rm280 fake 6MDH. used over 1 year still very good. kena rain whatsover also no problem This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 4 2011, 11:42 PM |
|
|
May 5 2011, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
for those who said 1750 vc said slow motor, not sharp enuff, i still earn using that lens till today. its been a year already
![]() Added on May 6, 2011, 12:11 ammy target this image is catch eye~! did i make it? This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 6 2011, 12:11 AM |
|
|
May 6 2011, 12:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
kedekot la lu~! luckily i got my chance to shoot one of my dream talent on that day~!
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 12:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
why the light only goes to armpit and but? go to the face la brader
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 01:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 01:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 02:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
ok what tammy? not that bad la. i just using 50mm f1.8 oni maa
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 02:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
nope~! thats the weakness point of nikon while canon do have for lower end body
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 02:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
if i organize paid photoshoot, how many people will come?
Added on May 6, 2011, 2:16 am QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ May 6 2011, 01:35 AM) 80200 more usefull and practical for wedding. bokeh is not everything but flexibility do come handy when come to wedding. u need fast fast fastThis post has been edited by Isepunye: May 6 2011, 02:16 AM |
|
|
May 6 2011, 02:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(fcuk90 @ May 6 2011, 02:17 AM) its not expensive one. since we still learning i think i can find newbies model and mua. im sure their price is cheap. the problem is i dont have any lubang for cloth except wedding dress. >< last time i organize cost around 50 - 80 per person only including some refreshment Added on May 6, 2011, 2:23 am QUOTE(gnome @ May 6 2011, 02:17 AM) Not much different with nikon then, its just that the lower end body loose the capability of autofocus with AF-D lens but they can still use it didnt u got the point? i mean cheap body still can play cheap lens and plus has battery grip. people buying cheap body normally will use cheap lens also not like u guys. buying D40, D3100 but owning those king of the prime. it just majority buying behavior cheap body = cheap acc = cheap cheap cheap This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 6 2011, 02:23 AM |
|
|
May 6 2011, 02:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
boom photo attack~!
![]() » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 6 2011, 02:39 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2011, 09:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(celciuz @ May 6 2011, 07:23 AM) Don't understand here, it is still a slow lens in terms of focusing but you can still nail pics if patient enough. how can u be patient on event like wedding? well i just be prepared instead of be patient.Added on May 6, 2011, 9:34 pm QUOTE(Andy214 @ May 6 2011, 11:09 AM) Another reason I highlight on the skin tones is because the picture just before aldos, the picture is bright and skin tones looks great, but suddenly, you scroll down to the next post with picture, you see the big difference. err my picture? imma abit over exposed person likey. looks better on her skintone to me and err to my client alsoAgain, no wrong or right and I didn't mentioned anything about wrong or right, my question was simply out of curiosity, 'is it under?', and also about contrast since I'm curious. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on May 6, 2011, 9:36 pm QUOTE(junior5417 @ May 6 2011, 11:33 AM) lick it~Added on May 6, 2011, 9:44 pmaldo ever wonder why i dont post unedited version normally?? Added on May 6, 2011, 10:24 pmsorii broken link bro aldo, here why i rarely post without any PP. sometimes just abit enuff ed. im no hardcore editor unless the picture require me to do so ![]() » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 6 2011, 10:25 PM |
|
|
May 7 2011, 10:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ May 7 2011, 03:37 AM) Hahahahahah hell yeah! that lens is one of the fav lens for yaman ibrahim and ted adnan how come u can say ugly?Btw, the colour and bokeh makes my 80-200 look ugly This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 7 2011, 10:09 AM |
|
|
May 7 2011, 11:08 AM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
May 7 2011, 11:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(celciuz @ May 7 2011, 11:18 AM) I agree with you. Slow focusing, hunting in lowlight are the weakness of the Tamron 17-50 VC. If it is so good, I don't think the Nikkor 17-55 would even get any sales lol. u forgot about 1850?IQ wise the Tamron is good for a sub 2k lens brand new, but it isn't perfect. Under 2k that is the only standard zoom range with fixed f/2.8. You got no other choice to be honest. |
|
|
May 8 2011, 05:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ May 7 2011, 06:13 PM) consider done » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on May 8, 2011, 6:23 amabit dissapointed with today shooting. i was too excited and end up i stalled~! teaser btw » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « who said lens must have VR only then can play slow shutter?? SS 1/3s nia~! can fight 1750 VC and OS ed and yes D90 ISO 3200 brader~! ada canggih tak noise dia? ![]() This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 8 2011, 06:46 AM |
|
|
May 8 2011, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ May 8 2011, 08:55 AM) wow... yes ISO 3200. adjust level only. flash off. btw exif still intact to see. first time play 1870 with slow shutterthe car condition is reali one of baddest among those i ever see... btw... reali iso 3200 without PP...? flash on...? QUOTE(168257061 @ May 8 2011, 09:16 AM) i am jpg shooter. hate raw Added on May 8, 2011, 8:22 pm QUOTE(celciuz @ May 8 2011, 08:31 AM) this car hit wira from back (got it from people mouth)wira 2 person broke leg, lamborg left unharm ![]() _DSC7594 by IsePunye, on Flickr This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 8 2011, 08:25 PM |
|
|
May 9 2011, 01:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(celciuz @ May 8 2011, 09:36 PM) Wira trying to tailgate the lambo o_O? no la. wira is innocent. lamborg was racing with porsche then donno how lamborg hit from behind the wira. that one i know also from people around thereMust be some heavily modified Wira perhaps Damn... this is getting boring... nothing new to shoot T_T. Added on May 9, 2011, 1:44 amstarving ![]() This post has been edited by Isepunye: May 9 2011, 01:44 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0457sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 04:56 AM |