Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Need recommendation/advise for my caraudio system, pls use this thread in the future

views
     
daijoubu
post Dec 24 2008, 01:03 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




Guys, is the Alpine Type R still in production now?

Are there any other similar brands/models that have the same sound characteristics of the Type R? Something that is good in midbass.

Thanks smile.gif
daijoubu
post Dec 26 2008, 11:33 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




thanks for your reply smile.gif
what is the price of the sl60? in what sense the SL60 is better than the type r?
thanks!
daijoubu
post Dec 27 2008, 09:45 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




thanks for the recommendation bro smile.gif

besides what, what current available speakers priced about RM600 and below that is closest to either the type r or the sl60

thanks smile.gif
daijoubu
post Jan 10 2010, 03:18 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




Guys, what is a good, component set for about RM500-800?

Currently using some Eclipse components which i like. My preference is SQL, with emphasize on mid bass and details. I quite like the sound signature of the old Alpine Type R, so something with similar sound characteristics would be great =D.

Thanks guys!
daijoubu
post May 16 2010, 09:09 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




of these 4, which do you reckon is best for SQ with good clarity and midbass?

Focal Access A1 RM750
Dominations D'Lite RM600
Boston Acoustics SX60 RM750
Alpine Type G SPG-17CS RM788

bear in mind im going to power it only with my HU so it should give good results unamped, but great results amped

thanks guys!
daijoubu
post May 17 2010, 05:41 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(gavinchong @ May 17 2010, 02:34 AM)
My Vote for Boston!
*
THanks for your input smile.gif. May i ask, why Boston? Midbass good? Easy to drive?

QUOTE(zennn @ May 17 2010, 12:33 PM)
if head unit power only.....boston, focal, alpine, domination
*
In order, Boston > Focal > Alpine > Domination?

Wah Boston really that good? 0.o

daijoubu
post May 18 2010, 10:49 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 17 2010, 10:09 PM)
boston easy to drive. sounds gud as well for its price. i had a SL60 before, can blast and sing without problem, very versatile speaker. midbass is not dat strong tho, but for sure it is clear sounding.
*
Is there anywhere i can audition a Boston SX60, Focal Access A1 and Domination Lite?

=D thanks!
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 01:31 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(MyWifeCar @ May 19 2010, 02:24 PM)
Yes bro. It is different.
Boston you can go KF Audio ma... They put it on the display....
*
I've went to KF today and tried the below. My opinions are:

RM800 range
- Focal Access 165A1 (amped) : Vocals abit harsh/noisy, midbass pretty strong
- Boston Acoustics SX60 (HU direct) : Vocals sounds abit more natural, midbass more solid, but midbass is weaker

Rm1200 range
- Boston Acoustics SL60 (HU direct) : Vocals sound very natural, midbass stronger than SX60, but feels somewhat more bloated, less controlled. whole system sounds very balanced

Is my acoustic observation of these sets matches you all? 0.o. Im curious cause im not that good, so i'd like to know whether my evaluation of these are the same as you all sifus =D.

Anyways, I like the SL60, but its way over my budget. So i'd like to firstly compare between the Focal Access 165A1 and the Boston SL60. Thing is both are not directly comparable since one is amped while the other isnt. I'd like to know whether will the 165A1 perform well with just HU, and what are you all opinion between this two? Which will benefit more in the future from amping? Is the Boston SX60 still undeniably better? Also I've heard so many about the Dominations Lite, but cant seem to find it to audit sad.gif.

Then, if i were to EXTEND my budget, and get into the Rm1200 range, what are the other options available to me? Again, i love solid midbass, and in every song i look out for the bass guitar and drum beats tongue.gif. Vocals should not be overly harsh, but natural and clear.

Thanks alot people! Appreciate the opinions and help guys!

To be Audited:
- Dominations D'Lite
- ???
- ???
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 10:18 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 20 2010, 02:35 AM)
dunno bout SX60, but since i owned the SL60 before, it sounds more or less like wat u said, midbass accurate but not enuf ommph, need sub to cover the lower freq. after amplifying it will give u much fuller sound. it depends on which HU u using oso. try dun face the tweeter directly to u, it might sound harsh at times. it's not a bad speaker overall. if u are able to stretch ur budget, i suggest u to go for the best. if u dun mind, maybe a 2nd hand product will give u much more satisfaction for the price paid.
*
Thanks for your reply bro! Haha i know u have the SL60 before. Its all over the web tongue.gif. You choosed it over the Type R and DLS R6A. Is it really better than those?

The SL60 really poisoned me. I was comparing the SX60 and the Focal Access 165A1, and both were more or less comparable, but once the shopowner insisted i try the SL60, bam, now both the SX60 and 165A1 sounds like crap sad.gif.

Such a dilemma cause as much possible i'd like to stick to my budget tongue.gif. Anyway, i'll try out the Dominations first, then recompare the SX60 and 165A1. If i really cant tahan then i'll up my budget.

But for RM1200, is the Boston SL60 the best choice? How about other options? Alpine Type X requires amp-ing to sound good right, so that might not be a good choice sad.gif. What are my other options?

Thanks alot people!
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 11:29 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(MyWifeCar @ May 20 2010, 10:40 AM)
Focal Polyglass for RM1200 range ~~~ You can try.

Dominations very natural sound, the review wrote it as the bass is very strong... even without a sub.
*
Noted on the Polyglass smile.gif. Will check them out too.

As for the Dominations, where can i find the review? I get mixed opinions on it. Some say fantastic, some say not established and hyped up =.=.

Anyone here that personally audited it before? How does it compare to both the Boston SX60 and Focal Access 165A1? =D

Thanks!
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 02:14 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 20 2010, 01:23 PM)
For my ears, SL60 sounded better than R6A and Type R. but R6A definitely has more bass, juz dat i dun like the midrange, very dull and has a gap between low mid and high, type R is quite powerful, more to SPL/SQL application, can go quite loud. SL60 is the smoothest among these 3. after getting the SL60, most stock sound system and cap ayam sounded crappy.
*
Mmmm... smooth.. i like smooth...
Argh poison! When i was at KF auditioning the 165A1 and SX60, i told her dont let me hear the SL60, but she insisted. I told her sure i'll get poisoned, and see, now SX60 and 165A1 sounded bad to me sad.gif.

Anyway i gotta see my wallet. Very painful to increase the budget cause i started with 1k for BOTH HU and speakers sad.gif. If i want the SL60, i'd have to increase another RM200, just for speakers alone =.=.

Still looking for anyone with actual listening experience for Domination Dlite! Need your comments on this vs 165A1 and SX60! =D

Btw ckmoy sifu, have you tried the SX60 before? In your opinion what is the sonic differences between the SL60 and SX60?
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 09:00 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 20 2010, 07:33 PM)
neva tried SX60. i jumped from cap ayam to SL60. smile.gif for me, i wouldn't bother spending the money for entry lvl unless i am really tight on budget. as u said, once u heard a better one u won't wanna go back. smile.gif SL60 lasted me for 2-3 yrs before i decided to upgrade again. most sifu will tell u to go for the best u can afford.tongue.gif
*
Thanks for your advice smile.gif. The highest my budget allows was initially SX60/165A1 =.=. But yeah, once u heard a better one, all the previous ones will sound like crap sad.gif. I plan to go HU direct drive until 1-2 years later only add amp. Will go back and try the SL60 unamped and amped to see the difference smile.gif.

QUOTE(boomber @ May 20 2010, 07:40 PM)
Sl60 will give you very warm, smooth and balance performance. Boston really famous with their smooth sound and good vocal reproduction.
If you are a first timer in ice and planning to replace your stock HU, Boston is a good choice. Go and try polygrass and dos, both are good speakers at reasonable price.
Regarding sx60, it is an upgrade version of s60 with warmer sound, the difference in the midrange speaker, but try to go for sl60 if our budget allow. I used s60, very asy to drive, decent sound quality. I upgraded my Boston s60 to mb quart premium, I still think that Boston better in handling vocal albeit a bit weak in midbass.

Btw, anyone interest with my s60? Lol
*
Thanks for your input bro! I've tried the S60 and the midbass was really lacking, tho like u said, it was clear =D. But funnily, the SL60 sounded like very heavy on midbass 0.o. It was unamped, driven by an Alpine set (at KF Audio). Is the SL60 an exception to the "Bostons are generally weak in midbass" perception?

How is the Focal Polyglass 165V2 sound signature?
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 09:43 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 20 2010, 09:11 PM)
u heard on the shelf or in the car? they give a totally diffrent sound.
*
QUOTE(boomber @ May 20 2010, 09:25 PM)
At KF they installed those speakers on wooden frame, will sound differ from the sound when you install it in car.

I also hope to get audison, saving for it.. lol
*
it was installed in a shelf =.=
how different would the sound be?



Found more choices in RM1.2k range:
- Hertz HSK165
- Rainbow CSX265
- Focal Polyglass 165V2

mann =.=

This post has been edited by daijoubu: May 20 2010, 09:54 PM
daijoubu
post May 20 2010, 10:17 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 20 2010, 10:06 PM)
how diff? listen for urself. every speaker will act/sound differently in diff environment. wat sound gud in wira might not sound gud in camry.
*
sadly they dont have test unit in car
i only have all board mounted ones sad.gif
daijoubu
post May 21 2010, 12:09 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(prozaclee @ May 20 2010, 11:45 PM)
I don't think so , last time i owned a SX60 , the midbass quite acceptable.
If you compare it with SL60 , SL definitely win it by miles.
Anyway did you try out their Boston Flagship SPZ60 & Pro60 ?
Try it in KF with the amp on , you won't regret about it . Maybe poison even deeper  tongue.gif
*
=.= i dont think i'll touch the higher ends one anymore. i'll only slap myself in the face. then i'll feel too guilty to spend RM1.2k on 'inferior' sounding comps
daijoubu
post May 21 2010, 01:21 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(ckmoy007 @ May 21 2010, 01:08 AM)
owh, dun let it stop, that's the very fun thing in ICE. things alwez get better and better. haha biggrin.gif btw, PRO60 sounds more interesting, haha. *injecting poison* go to those ICE TT as well, u will learn a lot there.
*
more like i'll be poisoned alot there right =.=
and i wont have enough antidote (money)

daijoubu
post May 21 2010, 10:40 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(prozaclee @ May 21 2010, 08:24 AM)
I bought the SX60 at 1st in KF then i feel regret after i heard the SL60 mad.gif .
After a few months later i upgrade it straight to Pro60 and somehow
the amp lacking of power to push it sad.gif Then hv to upgrade my amp again  mad.gif
If you don't plan to get a amp and you need a decent/nice speakers , my recommendation
SL60 , just my 2 cents  rclxms.gif
*
Ooh how was the SX60 BEFORE you heard the SL60? tongue.gif. Satisfied with it? Was the midbass ok?
What were you comparing the SX60 before you choosed, and what made you choose it?
Thanks bro!
daijoubu
post May 21 2010, 01:42 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




QUOTE(prozaclee @ May 21 2010, 10:54 AM)
Last time i only compared it with Alpine Type-S SPS171A and Boston S60
Tweeter perform far better than the Alpine and Midbass deeper than the Boston S60.
Overall still a good entry speakers. Right after a week i install the SX60 ,
then i itchy go in KF and try that SL60 , i just feel regret why i didn't try this speaker
when the time i shop there.
My opinion , SX60 is a upgraded version of S60 , SL was totally different design from the 1st 2 speakers.  icon_idea.gif
*
Thanks for the input smile.gif. When i tested the SX60 and SL60 the difference were definately there but i didnt test it long enough and with a song that im familiar with to know how big of the difference it was. Will be going back to test with my CD.

QUOTE(zennn @ May 21 2010, 12:13 PM)
for 1.2k can try dls r6a, focal polyglass and eton pro170

but if going ampless the focal will suit, but not much bass

dls has the best bass, nice vocals
etons are ok overall, and the boston sl60 also not bad

best run with amp la of coz
*
Thanks for your info bro smile.gif. I definately cant do proper amping (unless those Proton amps i have, which highest is 60watts so doubt it'll be enough) until at least a year or two. So of all, which sounds good unamped, but after amping, will have even better improvement in sound?

Btw do you do installations for the speakers you sell? If yes, where is your location?


daijoubu
post May 22 2010, 11:28 PM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




I've went to 4 shops today

- Audio Quest, SS15. Wanted to try Dominations Dlite, but they do not have the demo car available, so i need to return next week perhaps.

- KK Lau, SS3. No demo available for the units im interested.

- Audio Genesis. Tried Voz 601PC as they do not have much to offer. Tweeters pretty sharp and forward, not my type. Never heard of the brand before. Nothing else of interest for me to test.

- ACP Accessories, SS2. No demo for available for units im interested.

So i really did not gain much today. The one i was looking forward to most was the Dominations, but i have to go back next week to demo it. Meh =.=
daijoubu
post May 29 2010, 01:34 AM

Love Many. Trust Few. Do Wrong to None.
*******
Senior Member
5,193 posts

Joined: Jan 2003




Today went for another round of testing! Brought my own CD which i was more familiar with. Here are my findings:

Focal Access 165A1 : Reasonable amount of midbass, vocals are slightly muffled or veiled in comparison with SL60. Tweeters are slightly noisy. Midbass is pretty solid/less muddy

Boston Acoustics SX60 : Sibilance is quite bad, vocals very very bright. Nice at first but can get fatigued fast. Bass is weak. The clarity is definately there, great for vocals if can lower the brightness or down the trebles, but unfortunately lack of bass puts me off.

Boston Acoustics SL60 : Again, very smooth and bass is pretty strong. Dont think its as strong as the 165A1, but the vocals sounds less bright, while maintaining its clarity. Mids are much fuller, and overall sounds much more nicer then the above two.

Dominations Dlite : Tested in car (above 3 speakers tested on speaker board) with Dynamat-ted doors. This set is running purely off Persona OEM HU, with no amp and no sub. Midbass is VERY STRONG. Unfortunately its quite muddy and not very precise, although the strength is there. Not sure is this due to the dynamats, or the HU being low quality. Sibilance is better than SX60 and 165A1, vocals is pretty clear, but imaging is horrible, also maybe due to the HU. Kinda hard to conclude this set.

As of now, i am STILL not decided between the 165A1, SL60 and Dlite. SX60 is totally out, while Dlite is so-so. Its more of between 165A1 vs SL60. Not sure whether the extra money is worth it sad.gif.

Meh ICE is sooo hard xD.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0493sec    1.02    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:59 AM