Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Mitsubishi asx, This car doesnt seem to be popular here.

views
     
acbc
post Apr 16 2011, 06:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Overpriced and no AWD.
acbc
post Apr 16 2011, 08:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Still prefer the Airtrek Turbo... has everything for less than RM 70k now. But... too bad, RON97 only.

This post has been edited by acbc: Apr 16 2011, 08:06 PM
acbc
post Apr 17 2011, 07:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(yngwie @ Apr 17 2011, 03:50 PM)
exactly! i could have consider buying it if it was of 4wd transmission with the 2.4 sportsback engine.
sub 15xk bucks pricing should be fine.
settled for a d-max 3.0 manual instead which is more of a go anywhere workhorse.

btw, main reason less people buying the ask and sportsback?
just ask lancer owner. sooner or later, chances are proton may come out with their version of both car!  tongue.gif
*
+1

Why pay more for less? No AWD means the SUV is useless on flooded roads which is very common these days (heavy thunderstorm). And on top of that, it runs on petrol which more expensive than diesel but less powerful. For RM 150k, u can buy a Triton or Pajero Sports and load up RM 50k worth of useful accessories and performance upgrades. And even spare change for dyno test / tuning. Plus, it is cheap to run and cost less in the long run. Monthly installment also lower. Road tax is RM 831 per year but u already save lots from the diesel alone.

And, since the truck is very high... snatch thieves won't target it. U can bang the f***er off the road if needed too.
acbc
post Apr 18 2011, 10:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(tomaslian @ Apr 17 2011, 09:08 PM)
If given a choice between peugeot 3008 and mitsu asx, which one would u guys choose? Add in ur reasons, pls.
*
3008 of course... cheaper road tax (1600cc), better FC & superior 6-speed AT gearbox. And... traction control!


Added on April 18, 2011, 10:48 amThe ASX is a soccer mom's car in Japan...

This post has been edited by acbc: Apr 18 2011, 10:48 AM
acbc
post Apr 18 2011, 06:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Deja Vu @ Apr 18 2011, 02:06 PM)
Seriously dude, u really think u need all those 4wd features when d steepest gradient is usually d ramps at multi storey car parks? Also, d usual monsoon flood we have on our roads dun really require 4wd coz d road surface is still very much intact albeit under water n not theres current strong enuf to shift d vehicle off d route. D purpose of 4wd is for 4-wheel traction in conditions like snow, mud or loose gravel. Most local floods only need gd ground clearance.

Another point worth considering is d additional cost of 4wd features. Ur carrying around plenty of additional useless weight most of d time, pay more fuel to run them n more cost n effort to maintain d drivetrain. 

D ASX was not designed as a heavy duty vehicle, but more of a softcore SUV like d SX4, Terrios/RAV4, Grand Vitara 2wd n d ol Kembara for urban travelling, a higher seating position, plus a very little bit of 'adventurous' DNA. D high price is mainly due to our crazy tax structure(CBU from Japan) so no point crying over it. If u hv driven it, u'll notice its more civilised n composed than some step-ladder framed vehicle (Pajero Sport, Everest, n Fortuner). Lastly hv u ever parked a vehicle d size of a Pajero Sport is a typical shopping mall car park? If u hv, ask ur self how many ppl are willing to go through tis daily?

TS,
From d last test drive I had wit d ASX, my only n most serious complaint is d rather up-right rear seating position. Apart from all those, its ticks all d expected points of an urban light-SUV.
*
I drive my Triton daily and park in the same place as anyone would... trust me, it is a lot easier to park a large vehicle in shopping complexes for as long clearance is 1.9m minimum. And for as long the reverse sensors are working, what is so difficult? Unless of course, your parking skill sucks big time! And it is safe (which snatch thief going to target a large truck?) and FC is marvelous... u try to find a car / truck which can give u 700km of mileage at RM 100 tankful pure city driving. And when petrol price goes up, who suffer? For highway drive, I can get up to 850km. Some managed 900km!

For flooded roads, the extra height from 4x4 vehicles will help a lot... u just drive across the flood waters... no need to to follow others. If u want to cross a river, also can... just drive! And diesel trucks are cheaper to maintain than petrol ones... why? Minimal electronics and built tough for any situation.

This post has been edited by acbc: Apr 18 2011, 11:15 PM
acbc
post Apr 18 2011, 11:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(yngwie @ Apr 18 2011, 08:16 PM)
settled for an isuzu d-max 3.0 manual which is about the size of pajero sport. so far no problem with reverse parking.
asx was initially in the shortlist due to its ground clearance but removed due to no 4wd. still went for a test drive thou. quite under power.  the asx will only viable to 'soccer mom'; some ground clearance with 'truck like' rear seat(commanding driver's view and that's all). the crv fare better.  smile.gif
i don't need another 'higher ground clearance' sedan car ....jk tongue.gif 

acbc@ is right about the fc. i could cover close to 880km in full tank on d-max. for those who travel a lot, diesel car is a good choice. the fuel cost saved in a year is more than sufficient to compensate the higher road tax.
btw, the isuzu d-max double cab is a lot more easier to reverse park in any condition than the 850cc viva. the steering alone feels much differ  wink.gif
*
+1

Diesel is for everyone even if they hardly travel. It is cheap to run (diesel is RM 1.80/L and has better mileage), cheap to maintain (just make sure battery and starter ok) and cheap everything (don't even need to fix minor dents).

Face it, petrol is for people with loads of cash to burn by paying high fuel cost, spend more on electronics (stupid sensors, ECUs, wiring & crap) and pay more for something else. Yes, u save on road tax but come one... it is only once a year affair! Don't tell me u need to budget for paying RM 90 (1500cc) or RM 382 road tax (2000cc)? Diesel road tax is RM 831 for 2500cc which u recover back in less than 6 months from diesel fuel and mileage.

A friend of mine who only used his Triton to work and home, only need to pump every 2 weeks of RM 110 full tank. That is RM 220 per month! Compared to his previous ride, RM 400 per month! Service interval for diesel is every 10000km and can use cheap mono-grade engine oil such as Castrol CRB Turbo. If u have extra money, opt for something better.

Why do u think 70% of Europe used diesel engines? Even in Thailand, at least 50% of new cars / trucks are diesel powered.
acbc
post Apr 20 2011, 01:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Wilson13B @ Apr 19 2011, 11:06 PM)
At the most you are right bro,but these Common-rail diesel nowdays are also equipped with ECU and loads of sensors like Petrol engines,but it's reliability still like old times,most of Diesel's can sail through 200K Kms and still going strong but the only important thing is it's Engine Oil,it just like the "blood" in out body,for Malaysia diesel quality and if the engine have turbo,it is recommended to change between 3-5K Kms....and if your engine does have Turbo please dun use those cipplak Engine Oil,the most expensive oil just cost u about 0.5K for 4 L but 1 VGT Turbocharger for Triton,Hilux or so is costing u few K's ,so which one u choose to pay? But CRB Turbo is a quite good choice for Diesel with Turbo  wink.gif

But if for 4x4 i would go for Diesel because it have no spark-plug,even u immerse the whole engine into water with the air-filter out of the water,the engine will still runs,can u do this with petrol engine? haha  brows.gif
*
Well, unlike petrol engines... the sensors and ECU for diesel engines are reliable... after all, they are built for work! And diesel engines don't need electrical support to work (no spark plug, coil plug, igniter, power unit, distributor and etc).

The current Euro2M diesel is ok for most common rail engines... so, no worries. I have tried Thai Euro4 diesel back in Feb and of course it is way better but at higher cost (RM 3.10/L). And since diesel is for industrial use, the G cannot simply increase diesel price. If they do, everything will go up by 50% over night!

I have used Castrol CRB Turbo for my Renault Kangoo 1.5DCi (also common rail) for almost a year now... very good and gives good mileage and cost less than RM 80 for 4L. Will be using the same oil for my Triton and Navara after warranty period. And I always change oil every 10k and sometimes 7k depending on distance covered.

The perception with diesel engines here in MY is it is noisy, no power, smoky and it chatters. But, with more than 350nm of torque, who cares? U get both power and economy at the same time. With fuel controller such as Vector, u gain 30% more power... enough to tailgate an E46 325 on highways and still can jump over speed humps at 50kph.


Added on April 20, 2011, 1:11 am
QUOTE(Alpha700 @ Apr 20 2011, 01:00 AM)
What the ASX lacks is probably a turbo (keep thinking of the Airtrek).  brows.gif

Anyway, cars like ASX, CRV, Forester are more for urban folks who need something bigger than a regular sedan
but not as large as a normal 4x4. An occasional need to carry more stuff and the ease of loading/unloading.
The choice of petrol / diesel is dependent on what's available.

Some might argue that for the same amount of money, there are better choices but different people have different
needs. I'm sure a normal 4X4 isn't going to turn as well as a compact SUV and when you try loading / unloading
stuff, it's going to be more difficult on the taller vehicle. There are pros and cons to each design, consumers will
just make their choice based on individual needs.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
IMO, I always go for long term... because I only change cars every 10 years. Why?

1. Roads in PJ and KL are bad - need a tough vehicle
2. Floods are common here (at least in Kota Damansara) - need a tall vehicle to cross over
3. Too many smash and grab thefts - need a robust vehicle
4. Petrol price very unstable (at least for RON 97) - need something cheap and economical

I chose the Triton because it has everything I want for less money. Can do more and better. Easier to upgrade and cheap to maintain. Accessories plenty to go around. Can park anywhere... even on curbs and unpaved roads.

This post has been edited by acbc: Apr 20 2011, 01:11 AM
acbc
post Apr 20 2011, 08:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(xshiro @ Apr 20 2011, 01:35 AM)
in malaysia, roadtax for diesel is quite high bro...
*
Come on... RM 831 for 2500cc but u save on diesel and mileage. Petrol road tax is cheap but petrol itself will go up. Plus, it is a a yearly affair. U only need to budget once.

Take example... for diesel, to cover 2500km... u pump RM 400 per month. For the same mileage on petrol, u pay RM 550 per month. That's a saving of RM 150 per month. Multiply by 12 months, u already save RM 1800 per year which is more than enough to cover the RM 831 road tax. Think long term and rationally.
acbc
post Jan 25 2014, 07:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,050 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(12mah12 @ Jan 25 2014, 06:57 PM)
REGARDING TO THIS OVERPRICED, FIRST ITS A CBU CAR[TAX ISSUE]
AWD? MALAYSIAN DOESN'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT AWD OR WHAT, AS LONG AS THE CAR SAVE FUEL, POWER, SAFETY[ 100 AIRBAGS MALAYSIAN PREFER ] AND NICE LOOK
*
This heavy car doesn't save fuel at all. With outdated engine and gearbox... worse FC than 2008 Honda Accord 2.0!

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0449sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 07:06 AM