Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 3DTV and 3D content impression, 3D content n nt reflection screen rated

views
     
Steamen
post Aug 13 2012, 12:31 PM

On my way
****
Store Representative
526 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Penang


now day, survey the market, the cheaper 3D TV should be Plasma type TV, but unfortunately the low end with HD ready Plasma 3D TV resolution is 1024 x 768 which is 4:3 type and apply into 16:9 TV. I'm planning to own 1 unit 3D TV, which is Samsung PS51D491, but all shop said that is old model and no longer available in the market, my friend 8 months ago just purchase at RM2599 with free 2 glasses, but the new model which is PS51E491 selling at RM2999!!
Steamen
post Aug 14 2012, 01:05 AM

On my way
****
Store Representative
526 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Penang


QUOTE(Xstan @ Aug 13 2012, 10:06 PM)
Why not try out Passive 3D which is comfort to eyes, light, cheap & whole loads of advantage. Best 3d passive 3D now is the LG . latest 2012 model is LG LM series. I can say the 3d quality is awesome. Best is they come in 8 light specs. I'm pretty sure u want to show it off to all your buddies. U can even buy a set of 4 specs for only less then RM100.

Others are Panasonic ET5 but the shape loose out to LG ounteart.
*
Agree with you, the best Passive 3D should be LG, due to LG just only concentrate on their Polarized 3D system.
After survey the market and reading many news about 3D TV, I personal feel that Active shutter 3D system much better than Polarized 3D system, that's why LG 3D TV not in my consideration list, I much prefer Panasonic than Samsung, but Panasonic expensive than Samsung.

QUOTE(Mea Culpa @ Aug 13 2012, 11:48 PM)
the D491 is the E491 renamed ..  smile.gif
*
Not only renamed, spec also a bit difference, especially the resolution I'm talking, I do not wish 4:3 type resolution apply into 16:9 type TV.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.55    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 09:41 AM