QUOTE(SSY22 @ Apr 5 2011, 10:19 PM)
I also have one to share http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA6AbBM4c2I
This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 5 2011, 10:26 PM
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V8, D5100 announced !
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 10:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(SSY22 @ Apr 5 2011, 10:19 PM) I also have one to share http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA6AbBM4c2I This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 5 2011, 10:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 02:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 04:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 7 2011, 12:17 PM) You sure? o_O He went from Sigma 50mm to the 85G afterall. I don't think there's any regrets LOL. U are right, why regret when I have 85 f/1.4g? My 70200 VRII had this issue, but now spanking new! Added on April 7, 2011, 4:29 pm QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Apr 7 2011, 01:44 PM) Ofcourse not he regret the 85G over his 50mm la.... previously b4 he got 85G, he said Sigma 50mm is a very good lens already, he shud keep it, coz it's like 35mm on DX, not sure how he thinks now after getting da 85G,lol.... Sigma 50mm cannot be compared to 85g lah, even the sharpness already different This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 7 2011, 04:29 PM |
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 06:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Apr 7 2011, 04:32 PM) Not getting DX, getting 50mm 1.4 to fill up the gap between 35-70mm Added on April 7, 2011, 6:25 pm QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Apr 7 2011, 04:34 PM) Immune to wideangle prime This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 7 2011, 06:25 PM |
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 06:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 10:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Apr 7 2011, 09:28 PM) Am thinking to start an Excel sheet to act as database to store all Nikon (including 3rd party) lens to includes comment and experience from users like recommendation from which f value onwards will be sharp, any issue such as CA and etc. That would be great Should I start and then each of you input to made it up so I can compile? |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2011, 10:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2011, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2011, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Apr 8 2011, 06:02 PM) but if for portrait... Lol 16-35 is a wide angle lens lah, if u can't stand the wide why buy it at first place? Later sell again kinda hard rite...? reali can't stand d wide of 16-35VR @ FF... but dis one still long time lar... no money liao... declare bankruptcy for a short period... btw... izit ok to use LO iso in D90...? i mean lower den iso 200... Added on April 8, 2011, 6:44 pm QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Apr 8 2011, 05:51 PM) too bad 16-35 F4 no bokeh... U looking for bokeh then u should get 24mm f/1.4 got cheap one sure fast fast grab lor... if not den run liao i nid to pay @ new price... btw... 35mm let go liao... no lens @ d range of wide zoom can't de... later i think nid to get an ND filter for 85G liao... bro bliz + celciuz... ani idea...? coz 85G using @ normal day light is reali de hard... This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 8 2011, 06:44 PM |
|
|
Apr 8 2011, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 8 2011, 09:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 9 2011, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2011, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 9 2011, 03:26 PM) I can sense a debate coming up soon I only speak base on experience lol, if they think 135mm F/2DC is as sharp as 85 f/1.4g ( wideopen )feel free to post sample pics But then again, the other day when I sent my 70200 VRII and also when picking it up I tried the 135 f/2 DC. It didn't look as sharp as my 85G wide open on LCD that is haha QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 9 2011, 03:33 PM) I am selling mine too This post has been edited by Bliz: Apr 9 2011, 03:42 PM |
|
|
Apr 10 2011, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 01:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 07:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 13 2011, 07:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Apr 18 2011, 08:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(elainor @ Apr 17 2011, 10:39 PM) now im thinking to whether get a 14-24 or 16-35. Is it a huge difference between 16 and 18mm in terms of wideness. Kitty lens and dx lens no longer my preference... Just get the 14-24 if u dun mind the weight, the price as well as the inability to use filter.. It's sharper than 16-35 |
|
|
Apr 18 2011, 01:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Apr 18 2011, 01:50 PM) Hmm... no chance to test it at all....lol, I bought it to replace my 55-200 coz going to travel soon, hope I got chance to go the coming Super GT, lol..... No wonder u ask me bring telephotos to travel la, D700+BG+70-200 very big weight diff compared to D7000+BG+70-300vr |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0451sec
0.60
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:38 AM |