Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V8, D5100 announced !
|
|
 Apr 7 2011, 08:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008 
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Apr 7 2011, 04:18 AM) hahaha.. I suppose to finish by the end of the year. hopefully thing goes well. Wait till my Siggy 30 comes back from calibration, then i post poison kao kao I am a software developer too.  Adobe Flex developer, hehe... One is for DX and another one FX. Man... siggy 30mm 1.4 Poisoned me   |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 14 2011, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(hsienming @ Apr 14 2011, 10:06 PM) N8 sure no detail 1 when zoom to 100% colours looks more saturated then the D70 thats all I for sure pick the D70 image cleaner and colours nicer! Camera phones and compact cameras colours all saturated one laa. It's like make up to an ugly face   |
|
|
Apr 17 2011, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
How's the AF performance of the D7000?
 |
|
|
Apr 17 2011, 11:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(elainor @ Apr 17 2011, 11:36 PM) Hey guys, really need some suggestion on either to get a 16-35mm f/4 or an uwa like 14-24. I would like to get something that could shoot for landscape and minor food photog. But if i get a 16-35mm, i guess it will be useless on a dx dslr since they got crop factor but im planning to upgrade to fx in the future like probably when d800 release. So which lens should i go for? Thanks! What do you mean? Crop factor applies to both lenses what This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 17 2011, 11:41 PM |
|
|
Apr 17 2011, 11:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
I think you should go for the 14-24 since you might go FX. I hear it's a brilliant lens
|
|
|
Apr 18 2011, 09:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(xbbshampoo @ Apr 18 2011, 09:32 PM) is this lens Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G appropriate for shooting toys, portraits and landscape? Depending on how you use it, I suppose? Some people even use 85mm focal lengths, some use UWAs |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2011, 12:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Apr 18 2011, 11:38 PM) ya, all of that are night scene...>< Exposure +1 = Shutter goes down by 1 stop how to make it sharp? boost up iso at the same time smaller aperture and faster shutter speed?   public transport ar... err... i know if you take LRT to Asia Jaya... then go to millennium square... in front of that got a free shutter van can go to digital mall or you can walk to there...short distance only...err around 20 minutes... google map here 35mm in DX format is 52mm  terbulance recommended me one haha...RM750 >< Added on April 18, 2011, 11:42 pmi find out my DSLR monitor colour quite vibrant compare to my monitor... and gotta need time to experiment exposure bias...what is that if i change the setting to +1?? anything affect like shutter speed? |
|
|
Apr 19 2011, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Terbulance @ Apr 19 2011, 12:37 AM) This one nicer The slightly overexposed background looks pretty good, but the bokeh is somewhat distracting(like what Kai said)  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by -kytz-: Apr 19 2011, 01:30 AM |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 01:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
I think he meant the mini softbox lol
 |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 20 2011, 02:02 PM) if i was going to use one, i would save up and get something better like some of the lumiquest ones - eg. http://www.lumiquest.com/products/softbox-iii.htm Ppl go lastolite already la those cheap ones might work, but u have to see the effect for urself and see if it wont be any better than just using the diffuser that comes with ur flash.  About USD100+ though  |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 02:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
Yeap. You can use it on a tripod anyway.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i2BrTBVN9s#t=4m25s http://www.lightingrumours.com/lastolite-g...-speed-lite-735 |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
Agito damn lazy fella. PP oso lazy
|
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 03:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
Buying a laptop JUST for a "better display" is rather pointless. You're better off spending a fraction of that $$ to get a decent IPS monitor.
Sames goes to those who buy a phone JUST for the camera lawl. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
Dell IPS monitors:
 \Simply put, IPS monitors are a step above "normal" monitors in terms of colour accuracy and reproduction |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Apr 20 2011, 04:22 PM) IPS really that good? more expensive than the Samsung LED They're not even "LED" panels to begin with QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 20 2011, 04:33 PM) RM609 for a 23" IPS monitor?! Think I can consider one... still using a TN monitor at the moment Pretty much bang for buck eh?  . Been eyeing them for quite some time now, since last year But can't seem to force myself to get it |
|
|
Apr 20 2011, 11:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Apr 20 2011, 11:32 PM) haha i was joined nokia n8 thread photography there, went to putra to join them shoot with phone and DSLR (if got) Got street photography, why no invite me??? it is like a class for photography with sifu aspire2006 i missed last weekend class, that time sifu andy was there. thanks sifu  |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 01:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(ujoewong @ Apr 21 2011, 01:00 PM) Hello Guys. I'm planning to get a Nikon D7000 with the 18-105mm Kitlens. Focal length preference is a personal one. Some like it super wide, some like it exactly like what we see and also some like to go "sniper". Going to get an additional Prime for it too. I need advise on which one to get, I'm considering the Nikon 35mm or the 50mm as my main prime. Being a DX Body, we need to multiply by 1.5, is 75mm too narrow for street shooting ? So it's really up to you, there's no rule on which Focal Length is a must for Street Photography p/s: Why not get the 18-105 lens first? You can always set the Focal length mark on let's say 35mm and 50mm. Shoot for 1 full day on either focal lengths, and see which suits you best? |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 01:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(ujoewong @ Apr 21 2011, 01:27 PM) Alright. So, I'll get the 18-105 with it and try out both focal length 1st. Still tempted to go for 18-200mm. But, that's an extra RM2.6k. My budget only around RM5000. What do you guys think ? It's "and" NOT "to" |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 05:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
35 f/1.8 got ugly bokeh
*runs* |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
All Stars
12,573 posts Joined: Nov 2008
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 21 2011, 10:46 PM) ??? 1/8000 SS tak cukup pun lowest iso is of cos better...unless u mean higher iso like 1600... but then in bright sunlight who goes to that high iso? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.4571sec
 0.35
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 02:13 AM |
Quote
