haha.. looking forward to see that.
Price-wise everything beats Nikkor 35 1.4G
Woah.. Cool, working in which area?
Nopp, Development using Adobe Flex take a lot of time. I don't want to use it for FYP 

I think only under rated by KTCY only..... 

hahaa
it only beats it in terms of pricing

There r a lot of beginner out there who juz bought their dslr n want to try their 1st prime, but u keep on condemn 35 1.8G,say it sucks n IQ rubbish, n say only use gold ring lens... the most sarcastic photog i met, ppl using D3s oso keep quiet oni....

Nah. You should learn how to communicate politely so you can live in this world. 
especially with those who you never meet before.

yes...
2nd hand de lens...
16-35 VR...
who can help me to deal...?

yaloh, i want to choose either 50mm f1.8 or 35m f1.8 but i saw someone said 35mm f1.8 no good 

what do u mean, cant do what you want? what u want to shoot?

Don't want lah, stress only help people COD second hand items. Wait kena same case like the 1755 in PM.com LOL. Test kao kao already no issue, went back then got problem next day.

Just adjust until it looks good to your eyes ;-). But the original colors has to look good first!

d5100....

small la...

the red strip also got ruined

of cos sigma is more popularly known as SIGnificant MAlfunction

KTCY  mean D5100 is smaller than D5000 la... and the function or quality is something that u can die for it~

quoted RM 1.9k local set and 1.6k grey set for sigmalux by yannick what do you guys think?

Back-focus, front-focus, loose ring, gear-strip.

You name it, Sigma got it lol.

dont ask me...go google and see
its just generally and that applies to all 3rd party lenses due to issues u already know...

Actually you can also use the DX 35mm f/1.8 lens on FX body but you'd get heavy vignetting.
Like Andy214 said, if your exposure is spot on, don't be afraid to use high ISO. If you use low ISO and you underexpose, you'll still get ugly noise.
Cannot simply hantam-hantam. 
The Nikon is better in terms of colour and saturation. But better yet would be to go for the Nikon 10-24. It's better than the Nikon 12-24.
My Siggy has been sitting and not getting used. It used to be permanently on my D40x.
It's a DX only lens. Technical you can use on FX but if I'm not wrong, you can only use like from 18-24.
Why? If you're using an FX body, then I can understand. Aren't you still using a DX body?
If you suspect the DSLR is a display unit or 2nd hand, bring your laptop with card reader. Have something like Opanda Exif installed that is able to view EXIF data of the JPG file. Shoot one JPG from the camera and upload to camera. Check the EXIF and the shutter count data should be there.
You look down on a DX lens but not a DX body? 
Power alone is nothing without control.
 
If you want to be on an online forum and participate, do others here a favour and give correct information. If not, better to not to log in than logging in and be a nuisance to the forum community. Good information is one thing, misinformation is another.