Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Astronomy Photography, Lunar Eclipse on 4 March 2007

views
     
vikingw2k
post Mar 5 2007, 03:15 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



Snapped 3 hours ago at my house compound, donated lotsa blood to the bloody mosquitoes there sad.gif

Moon 1
user posted image

Moon 2
user posted image

Moon 3
user posted image

Moon 4
user posted image

Moon 5
user posted image
vikingw2k
post Mar 10 2007, 01:07 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(March05 @ Mar 5 2007, 09:00 AM)
Well done, vikingw2k.

I must say that these are probably the most detailed moon shots we've had in this thread shot without the use of a telescope. The first time I've see the capabilities of the Sony A100 for astrophotography.

Now, if only you had done this during the eclipse.........
*
thanks dude tongue.gif

QUOTE(littlegreen @ Mar 5 2007, 09:47 PM)
how many mm tele u uses .. i tried to take without the tripod so dam hard... no tripod at that time
*
300mm tongue.gif i snapped using my hands..no tripod

QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Mar 5 2007, 06:33 PM)
Viking, your photos are quite good. Did you overexpose the Moons purposely?
*
sharp eyes u have there tongue.gif


vikingw2k
post Mar 10 2007, 01:19 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Mar 10 2007, 01:15 AM)
Why did you want to overexpose?
*
playing with different settings smile.gif

5 more shots....taken on wednesday iinm cheers.gif

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by vikingw2k: Mar 10 2007, 01:19 AM
vikingw2k
post Mar 10 2007, 02:56 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Mar 10 2007, 12:44 PM)
Actually overexposing means that your photo signal to noise is almost 0.
*
huh? i tot you were saying that im reducing the shutter speed thus making it brighter and overexposed rclxub.gif
vikingw2k
post Mar 10 2007, 04:22 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(Mr.LKM @ Mar 10 2007, 03:21 PM)
Yes, it is. All of the photos we take for astronomy has to be exposed correctly.
*
miss my 12x optical zoom / 432mm S3 IS sad.gif

anybody tried shooting with S3 IS before?
vikingw2k
post Mar 12 2007, 10:31 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



QUOTE(julchin_09 @ Mar 12 2007, 01:44 AM)
HI.
My S3 IS is the only thing near telescopic which I have. And the best shot of the moon using the 432mm without digital X is this. Too much noise polution at my place to try taking sky pics on starry nights. I know thou that MR.LKM's house pretty good place for that....

user posted image
*
the other half bitten by u? laugh.gif
vikingw2k
post Mar 26 2007, 01:14 AM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



Snapped just now at my house

user posted image

more half moon pics here
vikingw2k
post Apr 3 2007, 07:49 PM

LYN T-Zone'z Guardian
Group Icon
VIP
9,778 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL(Wangsa Maju) , Seremban 2



Full Moon - 2th of April 2007

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0377sec    0.90    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 07:22 AM