QUOTE(azarimy @ Jan 14 2012, 10:18 PM)
it doesnt really make a difference. foundation in arts would still teach the same things in foundation of architecture, design or built environment. yes, they may emphasis on one than the other, but it's no more than a subject or two. it's when it gets into 1st year that it starts to differ from school to school.
Sorry, but I beg to differ a little. In (UTAR's) Foundation in Arts we have only one design subject per trimester; the other 4 cater to other disciplines in arts like marketing, management etc. And english. The design subject itself caters to graphic design, multimedia and architecture students, so you won't find any specific focus on architecture. There are still things that are related to it of course, like perspective drawing, colours, composition etc. No scale rulers or technical drawing yet! You can always apply the knowledge gained to architecture though. In fact I learned a lot about drawing in general there, and it was very fun despite struggling with new media, topics and the like. Hehe.
On the other hand my friends from UCSI's and Taylor's Foundations in Architecture get the best of both worlds, so to speak. They get to dabble in the basics of architecture AND practise drawing. They still have english subjects, MQA subjects etc, but all in all they have one year's worth of extra experience over those from Foundation in Arts (and maybe every other pre-u too? Not too sure).
What some of them did was take Foundation in Architecture elsewhere, then continue their degree at UTAR. UCSI's and Taylor's can be carried over without a hitch apparently; I'm not too sure about LKW, but should be no problem also. Gotta refer to the authorities to be sure.
Regardless of the type of foundation, there's still drawing, and one of the assignments in UTAR requires you to draw and colour a building, A2 size, so you get some exposure anyway. Happy happy