please make sure you get the 1.2ghz processor model and not the 1ghz one. there are both the same price. 1.2ghz dual core is samsung made processor which is faster while the 1ghz dual core is nvidia made slow but perform better at graphic processing.

Noted
Will update u guys later

the gsmarena website link u provided states this phone has 1.2ghz processor but you said it is 1ghz, can double check plz or typo?

okie, will update it

Because Samsung don't have enough 1.2ghz exynos processor some region will get the more common nvidia tegra 1ghz model. Although 1.2 sound faster then 1 but because nvidia tegra processor is more common many software are optimized for it thus runs faster then Samsung exynos (if you read backward its Sony xe. ). But supposedly the exynos is more energy efficient.

By the way, when Will it be available? Wait til my neck also long

so which is the one to get?
i see the specs there are two differences between region to region.

1. processor: 1.2ghz exynos & 1ghz tegra
2. super amoled plus & super lcd

i think should be 1.2 & sc-lcd

stock in hand now?

not yet, still need to wait

maybe both will be bumped clock to 1.2Ghz i guess.. weird that Samsung will be selling two variants at different clockspeed

yalor, dunno what they wanna play

production reasons?
maybe the 1.2 and super plus amoled not enough stock?

the reviews SGS2 trumps Iphone4 is almost every way so mebbe they would spec up to fight the iphone5 when it comes out in Q3?
do let us know whats the spec of the stock u get

iphone 5.... not so fast loh..end of the year could be

rumours say its gonna hit the market in july

please don't get the LCD one. TOtally sucks if it's the LCD. But i heard that LCD model is suppose to be cheaper.

Tegra 2 will be much stable perhaps compared to exynos. Still, having two variants is not healthy for the modding community. Most europe devs will go for exynos while later us version might get tegra2.. choose wisely, not only specs but also dev support will be different maybe

S-LCD how sucks if compare to S-AMOLED?
S-LCD sure is cheaper a lot one..

noted..

SLCD can be seen in some HTC devices. Although it's better then LCD and even OLED/AMOLED but IMO it's inferior to the Super Amoled. The LCD have higher resolution and brighter being a LCD but color is more washout and not as vibrant as a Super Amoled. Being brighter the SLCD actually looks better on picture comparison but on real life the Super Amoled actually look way better IMO. And the Galaxy S 2 is suppose to have the Super Amoled Plus which make Super Amoled look like some cheap display. The Super AMOLED Plus is brighter, more saturated color, darker black, higher contras, lighter, sharper, thinner and also more energy efficient. I think most people have their I on the Galaxy S 2 is because of the Super Amoled Plus display.

if nothing changes, should be using the S-amoled.. no worry

they already did weird things.. try list up galaxy s phone under samsung's name..

galaxy s.. galaxy sl..captivate.. fascinate.. vibrant.. galaxy s 4g.. galaxy s giorgio armani.. etc.. all of them galaxy s.. lol

oh ya.. galaxy s plus oso got.. lol

This post has been edited by krob7: Apr 26 2011, 04:28 PM