Battlefield 3 also releasing for consoles too right? So is it gonna pull off another crysis 2 cry engine 3 stunt? meaning if its console friendly then it shouldnt be such a resource hog?
Frostbite 2.0 VS Crytek3, which one more powerful?
|
|
 Apr 5 2011, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
84 posts Joined: Mar 2009  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 06:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
84 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(GreaseMonkey90 @ Apr 5 2011, 05:23 PM) its being developed on the PC 1st. thn port it to the consoles Crytek apparently said crysis 2 was also developed on pc as well then port to pc so is B3 following same trend? |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 03:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
84 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
so it boils down to the question...will frosbite 2 be like what crysis 1 was to hardware last time? ultimate resource hog?
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 06:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
84 posts Joined: Mar 2009
|
QUOTE(fat cat @ Apr 6 2011, 04:15 PM) should be as many people complained that crysis 2 was not pushing the limits graphics wise so bf3 should make use of current gen hardware. i sure hope so bro! the trailers released so far look amazing!  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0174sec
 0.82
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 06:37 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.