Frostbite 2.0 VS Crytek3, which one more powerful?
|
|
 Mar 6 2011, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006  
|
i like frostbite
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 10 2011, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(ZeneticX @ Mar 8 2011, 11:19 PM) i think cryengine focuses more on gc processing while frostbite is more towards processor if recommend spec is quadcore then my laptop cannot play already but cryengine 3 is an exception bcoz its also optimized for consoles, which is good news for those who hav outdated rigs like me.and dun be surprised if the recommended spec for frostbite 2.0 is another quad core,although i hope the developers will further optimize the engine to be resource friendly   |
|
|
Mar 31 2011, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
i feel like crytek pro in rendering realistic environment
while frostbite pro in rendering effects and interaction somehow i dont seem to like crysis 2 a lot, prefer to old crysis where there are more free roam and more destructible talking about destructible, crysis is far behind bc2  |
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 07:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
5,542 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
QUOTE(chrisoh @ Apr 5 2011, 06:37 PM) Crytek apparently said crysis 2 was also developed on pc as well then port to pc so is B3 following same trend? lol...i thought they develop crysis 2 for console first then port to pc  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0163sec
 1.44
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 09:04 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.