QUOTE(C_Sagi @ Mar 15 2011, 12:04 AM)
5.3/5.4k. Need to wait till fren tell me the convert rate. But it's around there. 
cheaper by 400+-Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V6, Nikon announcement on Mar/Apr ?!
|
|
 Mar 15 2011, 12:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
 
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Irfan2397 @ Mar 15 2011, 12:07 AM) oo, so what lens you reconmend me ?i need a long range lens cause there will be 3 photographer and i dont want to disturb them cause there all pro i am noob Long range ? Be the first to shoot wedding with 600mm then  Added on March 15, 2011, 12:08 am ok will look at that btw thx for you suggestion  Seriously, if you don't know what you need, you really don't need anything ! Stick with what you have ! |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 12:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
True enough. No point go disturb and spoil the 3 appointed photographer's job
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 12:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(Irfan2397 @ Mar 15 2011, 12:14 AM) to repay his kindnees to let me own a DSLR and poisoning me to enter the side The best repay should be NOT TO DISTURB AND BLOCK THE APPOINTED PHOTOGRAPHERS in taking all the moments ! ,cause before this my target is Canon 1000DYou have no experience at all. Can you assure that you won't block them when they're working on to snap the moments ? QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Mar 15 2011, 12:15 AM) Anyone has experience with Sigma 30mm f1.4? Might look for that instead of the Nikkor 35mm f2 Soft ! |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 12:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Mar 15 2011, 12:19 AM) You think those appointed photographers won't be able to find a better angle than yours on that day itself? Don't underestimate these wedding photographers That's why I said he totally 0 experience  |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 12:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Don't ruin other people's wedding for the sake of your practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 01:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Your friend own both lens ? I owned both. 50/1.4 sharp on f2.2 onwards !
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 01:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
  |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 01:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Event coverage last weekend
  |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 02:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I sold off my 50/1.4 after I own that 35/2. Reason : Sleep in my bag / drybox 99.9% of the time.
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 02:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I spend around 600 for my tripod. RM 50 tripod for few thousand worth of my gears ? I dare not risk
 |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Mar 15 2011, 02:34 PM) Just to note that the 12-24 (I assume from Nikon) is a DX lens. My 24/1.4G haven't come back.Thanks for the honest insight. That's correct. On a Canon body, you always have to use a f/2.8 to be able to use the other AF points as it will be automatically disabled. Once your lens is f/4 or f/5.6, than only the centre point AF works if I'm not wrong. No such thing with the Nikon. If the differences are just at 100% zoom, I think you should not get too worried. Get a lens that works for your photography. Specs is one thing but what's the point of having the best lens when it does not suite and complement your style of shooting? Don't worry too much. The 35mm f/2 is a legendary lens in it's own right. Looks like you're enjoying the 35mm f/1.4 more than the 24mm f/1.4? Looks to me like the focus is slightly to the back part of the hair. Is that correct? And yes. The focus was on hair  |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 02:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
It is. But need to wait shipment from KL as I residing in Penang.
And most Nikon peeps clearing their leave. Not to forget, some of them preparing for upcoming 10th anniversary event. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(cik_tak @ Mar 15 2011, 02:54 PM) hmm ... x sharp . Already mentioned above that focus was on hair just my 2 cents opinion .  How many times need to clarify ? And event photos not necessary to be in tack sharp This post has been edited by KTCY: Mar 15 2011, 03:01 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Spotlight was directly towards the camera. N really makes wonder.
35/1.4G without ED tho. If only 24/1.4G with me. Can try out and see the different.  |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:16 PM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
Power in shooting those fans sleeping ?
 |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
I use 70200 for portrait. Used to own 85/1.8 (2 of it) but sold off due to lousiness of the lens.
Yes. 50mm quite tight. 35 is good. Get the 1.4G if you can afford. It's superb ! |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
someone here that just commented my post on previous page
This post has been edited by KTCY: Mar 15 2011, 03:35 PM |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 03:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
50/1.4G - 1.8k
85/1.4G - 4.6k 35/1.4G - 4.85k 24/1.4G - 6.5k |
|
|
Mar 15 2011, 04:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
|
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
|
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Mar 15 2011, 03:59 PM) For me lor. Everyone has their one opinion right? It's only sharp at f/2.8. I haven't tried many other lenses tho yes, sharp on f/2.8 *i find it a little soft still* Wow 35 more expensive than the 85, thought it's cheaper QUOTE(geekster129 @ Mar 15 2011, 04:05 PM) How many lenses are sharp at f/1.4? 85G only? All the N QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 15 2011, 04:08 PM) 24mm if the AF is spot on, 35 should be the same too. Only the 50mm is not good at f/1.4 heck even the older 50mm f/1.2 AiS does better wide open! I saw a comparison done by a forummer in PM with a 50mm f/1.2 AiS versus the 50mm f/1.4D. Wide open, the f/1.2 wins! Pretty surprised to see an old lens beating up the newer one. That 1.2 ais is a beast  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0449sec
 0.85
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 08:07 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.