Just test drove both. Would pick the 308 Turbo over the Polo anytime.
VW Polo 1.2 VS Peugeot 308 Turbo, Please help
|
|
 May 26 2011, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
3,045 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Canterlot  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2011, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
3,045 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Canterlot
|
me? i'd love to have the Focus TDCi, but the price is out of my budget.. actually aiming for the Fiesta, which is just nice for my budget..
 |
|
|
May 27 2011, 04:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
3,045 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Canterlot
|
QUOTE(victor_hoh @ May 27 2011, 03:32 PM) I have not test driven the Polo, but I can say that the responsiveness of a dual clutch gearbox is really way better than a torque converter slushbox. This is from my test drive experience of the Ford Fiesta. The car is very eager to launch with just a light tap on the throttle. I can only imagine that the experience should be multiplied by 10 for Polo, with a force-inducted engine. The gear change in the Polo is seamless. the only way u can tell that the car has changed gear is by looking at the current-gear-position indicator (dunno what it's actually called.). in 308, gear change is still smooth, though not as smooth as the Polo. Plus point for the 308 is the wastegate chatter (dunno the correct term, the 'shii shiii' sound when u lift ur foot off the throttle). |
|
|
May 29 2011, 06:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
3,045 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Canterlot
|
QUOTE(Bliz @ May 28 2011, 11:47 AM) I have considered the polo once as well, but after seeing the real one its so damn small for the price ( 110k haha, good for u! lovin the focus TDCi?  ... in the end i bought Focus TDci for 12xk   |
| Change to: |  0.0714sec
 0.41
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 06:02 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.