EDITED
so galaxy ace confirm got no flash support?
This post has been edited by Fornaxlife: Feb 21 2011, 09:30 PM
♠ Samsung Galaxy Ace ♠, Decent mid range phone at RM9xx
♠ Samsung Galaxy Ace ♠, Decent mid range phone at RM9xx
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 09:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
EDITED
so galaxy ace confirm got no flash support? This post has been edited by Fornaxlife: Feb 21 2011, 09:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 7 2011, 06:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(khaikai @ Mar 7 2011, 04:04 PM) Thanks for your info. But Galaxy S is the big bro RFS file system sux max. i think still required to do lagfix though. But somehow i feel this phone had some advantage over galaxy s. 1. Price cheaper a lot 2. There's LED Flash while SGS don't have. If only Galaxy S has LED flash... |
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 09:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
galaxy s has 2gb memory to install apps.. how bout ace?
|
|
|
Mar 8 2011, 09:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
836 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0145sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 01:44 PM |