QUOTE(oldKyoo @ Apr 4 2011, 07:00 PM)
launch likely in may.Samsung GALAXY S II Official thread V1, Reviews/FAQ/Tips/Accessories/Apps
Samsung GALAXY S II Official thread V1, Reviews/FAQ/Tips/Accessories/Apps
|
|
Apr 4 2011, 10:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 9 2011, 12:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
galaxy s 2 pawns optimus 2x
but the longer samsung waits, more ppl will buy lg. QUOTE Final words sauceWe’ll this is it. Our comparison of the Samsung Galaxy S II and the LG Optimus 2X is over. We had a lot of fun with both, and we’re actually sad to finally get to the end. That exciting feeling of the unknown before every test, the anticipation of the results – we gadget geeks live for that stuff. We have to say that each contender had its handicaps. The Optimus 2X is still on Android 2.2 Froyo, while the Samsung flagship is a pre-release unit that hasn't still got the promised factory overclock to 1.2Ghz. The Samsung Galaxy S II feels like the top dog in this head-to-head. It has the upper hand with the SuperAMOLED display, the amount of available RAM, and the still and video camera. Plus software-wise, it comes with the latest Android version with better overall UI customizations (if you are into that stuff). The Galaxy S II had more time to prepare for this fight than the Optimus 2X – that’s the price of being the first dual-core smartphone out there. Rushing to be first in the world, the Optimus came out without the latest Android build and without competition, while the Galaxy S II had time to check out its opponents and give its best. A little like cheating, we have to say. But the end result is what counts above everything else. But don’t take this as a total defeat for the Optimus 2X. It’s still a nice and powerful device. And it stood its ground with pride. It has a relatively good display and camera plus a great processor that’s still almost unmatched in smartphone terms. It’s a great smartphone, it's just not the best – that would have to be the Galaxy S II title. |
|
|
Apr 10 2011, 08:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 18 2011, 07:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 19 2011, 08:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
QUOTE(oldKyoo @ Apr 19 2011, 08:48 AM) I think its clocking speed. like how they changed the thickness of tab 2?same chip, but its the manufacturers who decide whether to bump the speed up or down. samsung change suddenly, where got enuf time to buy stock, think go giant buy honeystar ah??? these koreans react so fast. |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 01:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
151 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0392sec
0.54
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 09:53 PM |