There are die hard Plasma lover and die hard LED lover. So best go and check them out yourself. And one more thing, LCD is inferior to both.

LED is a generic term for LED lighted LCD but we all know that.

I seen Samsung LED a couple of time and yes, I find them far too sharp to be natural. I tried looking at a person in front of me and look at his face outline. And I realize real life person's face can not look as sharp as what the LED is showing so I too came to the conclusion LED is not natural.

Of course different people like different thing. Some people like lady with heavy make up aka vivid but less natural color. But I like 18 years old ladies with the natural look and no make up so I picked Plasma and Panasonic.

Petrol cars are outdated technology. Hybrid cars save money. You still driving petrol cars? Ditto Plasma vs LED.

LED will be outdated one day. To be replaced by hologram or something more fancy.

But last I read, with 3D HDTV, Plasma seems to have a upper hand. So much for outdated technology. LOL

How this is very strong words by a long established & respected AV magazine on a top of the line LED.

"You’re after the best possible picture, as plasma still rules the picture quality roost, and Samsung’s plasma sets are excellent performers"

http://www.avguide.com/review/samsung-un46...00?src=Playback

While there many things great about LED, generally speaking, it's very difficult to beat Plasma for picture quality. So much for your looking down on outdated technology. So you buying TV for picture quality or because they say it has sexy technology?

How much does a 50" cost?