If compare to D700, D3/D3s/D3X, yes

Nope, it's true the d90 is slightly better than d300 for high ISO performance.
It even competes well enough with d300s.

Spam a bit
Since I am learning landscape photography. I wish I could have critique and comment. Please.

wedding shots ppl want to see their faces la.
not fancy low light scenery.

and thats why some ppl drag assistants who carry tripods

bro celciuz...
so from ur side...
16-35 F4 wins all rite...?
for me...
wide range no nid so big aperature...
coz DOF quite short...

so long list 
need many time to digest....

I mean practically you will use it at f8 right?
so an aperture is it a consideration of choosing UWA?
I have sigma 10-20 4-5.6
and sigma 10-20 3.5
sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6 DC HSM
tokina 12-24 in my mind
what do you think?
those makes me think whether aperture is a consideration of choosing UWA or not.
bro are u sure nikkon is releasing 50 1.2?
because I heard that Nikkon mounting place is too small which makes them hard to make those big big aperture lenses.

Any reason why? 24mm f/1.4 better than 35mm f/1.4?
Yup, for most people, it's overkill since landscapes are always shot stopped down.

Big apertures on wide angles benefit people shooting in low light like photojournalist.
The pic posted is the old Nikkor Manual Focus lens. So it is possible that Nikon would come out with an AF-S version.

Heck, one of the most coveted lenses i.e. Noct is a 58mm f/1.2.

went for dinner yesterday.. practice food photography.. but i cant seem to get sharp enough focus =( I used my 18-55 on A mode with f/7.1, ISO 1600 and shutter speed of about 1/20... still cant get sharp focus

here's the best i got.. this is the only one i uploaded to the net.. others i dont dare xD
snc6/180744_10150153753903296_719908295_8016026_6844170_n.jpg[/img]

ok... I jacked the aperture value higher because i wanted more DOF... and for me 1/20 isnt much problem before.. Maybe i didnt take note of the absent of crisp sharpness before... ok next time wont put so slow shutter speed/big aperture already...
For the ISO, all the while ive been using 1600 without any big problems

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

was bored so i wanted to take pictures of a still object, picked my dad's old canon AE-1 program... is it ok if i post the pic here or are there any brandist here who cant tolerate the sight of canon? lol

how POP? the only PP in this is my watermark 

Composition... i always have that problem.. somehow I still dont knowwhat that is lol nevermind will do some reading Thanks for the tip

Gear head for me =  collect rare items and it doesn't mean I have to understand all the technical things about this. Spending cash to enjoy looking at it lying in my drybox.
Technical stuff as in that lens how many blade, MFD, how many elements, how many groups etc and etc !

Talking about your age is because the person at your age take technical thing too seriously !  Don't deny
Kopitiam ? Well, go check the board. Almost everywhere is like this. You can't accept we TCSS, don't read
And we don't share photos at specific gallery too. Take celciuz as example. He does have one but mostly post it at here.

any sifu here got use ipad? got transfer photos to ipad for better view when not in PC?

ya .... not really like itune manage photos.... i usually email to my self 

you use what transfer photos? connection kits? or eye-fi? 

Using shades? means?