
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 11:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
how to compare with D90 3200 noise? haha
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 11:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Feb 16 2011, 11:39 PM) nice~! almost same with roy zakaria shoot. are u frens?This post has been edited by Isepunye: Feb 16 2011, 11:51 PM |
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 12:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 18 2011, 12:04 AM) Hmm... I just thought about this recently and coincidentally it already being discussed here. Says... tokina 116If I ditched the kit lens and to go for 35mm f/2D with D7000 body only as my starter pack. I'll be missing out the wide capability. I don't need zoom, but wide yes. Any recommendation for affordable wide lens other than the kit if I ditched it out? Added on February 18, 2011, 12:23 am QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 17 2011, 04:50 PM) for ur info.. 18mm in DX is consider wide d... just recently my mind said 11mm at DX is not wide enuff hahaultrawide is around 10-12mm for FX, 24mm consider wide.. and 16mm consider UWA d.. dont believe me? google la Added on February 18, 2011, 12:26 ampeople keep on asking about same item. why dont they just buy it and try their ownself rather then keep on asking and arguing? :blur: This post has been edited by Isepunye: Feb 18 2011, 12:26 AM |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 02:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
recent tweetup at grovy baby~!
![]() Added on February 21, 2011, 2:15 am » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on February 21, 2011, 2:16 amall taken with 116 thats why distort This post has been edited by Isepunye: Feb 21 2011, 02:16 AM |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
shooting a bird with 1750 yaw
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 08:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
even wider~! wah after this shoot bird with UWA lah
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 11:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2011, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 08:06 AM) I don't have the nikon 50 1.4, I thought it would be sharp at f/2. push pull much slow then two touch. push pull i think slightly faster then kit lens onlyIn a wedding & another event, I used a D90 with Nikon AFD 80200 f/2.8 two touch version & not the 2 previous models of the push pull version. It is sharp and built like a tank.. and it weighs like a tank too... I believe it is more durable & could withstand more hard knocks than newer lenses with SWM motor and VR. Speed wise, newer lenses like 70200 VR & VR2 and the Sigma 70200 HSM focuses & locks focus faster. I tried an older version of Sigma 70200 HSM and it focuses really fast, & the latest version with OS would be much better I guess. Suitable for events, weddings & fast action stuffs. BUT KEEP IN MIND that the Tamron 70200 comes with a slow motor (micromotor) and focuses really slow. The Nikon 80200 is faster imo. The older 80200 is damn nice but it is slower (don't know how much slower it is) compared to lenses with SWM/HSM motor like the 70200s. For portraits, outdoors the 80200 performs fast enough. - If you really need the best with VR - Nikon 70200VRii or Nikon 70200VRi - Still want fast focus with lower budget - Sigma 70200 (there's 2 current models with & without OS (VR equivalent) and if you want sigma, make sure you check the focusing because some tend to back/front focus) - Don't really shoot fast moving objects but want tank like build quality & durability - Nikon AFD 80200 (two touch version) -NIKON- Added on February 22, 2011, 11:47 pm QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 22 2011, 08:58 AM) wedding shots ppl want to see their faces la. i lol at ur post~! instead of drag assistant to carry tripod i rather drag more assistant on detail or surrounding camera man. for me, i want moment in the wedding and need to shoot fast. every second countnot fancy low light scenery. and thats why some ppl drag assistants who carry tripods Added on February 22, 2011, 11:48 pm QUOTE(kakisemut @ Feb 22 2011, 01:52 PM) good for you.. i dont say its not good. im loving it~! its sharp. color wise. just when i shoot at 11mm, the distortion are obvious. so all people at the corner of the edge will be super awkward. u can look back at the picture as most of the shot was at 11mmpractice make perfect... hehehe... Added on February 22, 2011, 1:56 pm mean 116 is not good? i want to funding for wide lens... need some reversion about the lens first... This post has been edited by Isepunye: Feb 22 2011, 11:48 PM |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 12:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Feb 23 2011, 12:09 AM) Anyone know this? Sharpness of the 80-200 two touch compare to 70-200 VR? if me ill go 80200. never tried sigma but two touch sharp quite awesome to me. sorry no photo for datLet's say you guys have RM3k budget, would you get the 80-200 two touch or third party 70-200? |
|
|
Feb 23 2011, 01:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Feb 23 2011, 12:35 AM) i dont have push pull stock image at my lappy but i do have push pull at wide open. lets the picture talk to u. yes i left unedited. see the exif as its still intagF2.8 Focal lenght 200mm. my frens said its sharp at F4, focal 100 - 180mm two touch is sharper then this lens as i remember. slightly sharper ![]() |
|
|
Feb 25 2011, 01:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
Feb 26 2011, 03:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(kakisemut @ Feb 26 2011, 02:47 AM) hi..everyone... how much 3rd party batery? IIRC ori batery only around RM150 mahi just want to know... if im using third party battery pair with ORI battery by using in mb-d80... is it ok... i want to buy another battery... but dont have sufficient fund for ORI battery... i would like to try phottix battery... |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 07:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 07:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
Tokina 116
![]() |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
QUOTE(Bliz @ Mar 1 2011, 08:15 PM) ron95 reli degrade performance Added on March 1, 2011, 11:11 pm QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2011, 08:53 PM) i use both carbohydrate (legs) and electricity (LRT) everyday. i also used lrt to go to workGreen FTW.... use less film and more digital This post has been edited by Isepunye: Mar 1 2011, 11:11 PM |
|
|
Mar 1 2011, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
damn flash just too harsh i guess
kitlens ![]() This post has been edited by Isepunye: Mar 1 2011, 11:38 PM |
|
|
Mar 2 2011, 11:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
|
|
|
Mar 4 2011, 12:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,537 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Bangi |
![]() |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0493sec
0.81
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:17 AM |