Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
12 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:03 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 21 2011, 10:01 AM)
Bro KTCY, for the nikon 2470 can I use B+W F-PRO or should I get the XS-PRO?
*
F-PRO also can already actually.
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:14 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Please spoiler if you quote the photos.
Thanks !
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:19 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
F-Pro is actually quite thick.
XS-Pro is the slimmest.
I guess 24-70 should be fine with F-Pro. Only UWA will cause serious vignetting.
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:42 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Hoya HD and XS-Pro price actually quite similar .
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 12:35 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 11:52 AM)
How much is the current price now for the XS-Pro?

I know the HD recently was about RM250... XS-Pro I only managed once at RM250.. the other time was RM300 >_<
*
HD 250, XS 290 !
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 03:02 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(vitac_hao @ Feb 21 2011, 03:00 PM)
AF Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G

Is this the correct one ?? If this is the price, then surely i'll go for it.
No problem fitting it with D3100 right ??
*
That can't be used on D3100
You need to get 70-300 VR.
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 03:10 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Bird shooting 300mm not enough la.
At least 500mm and above.
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 03:13 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
kit lens can't get bird shooting la.
Chicken shooting probably can laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 03:24 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Bright day light should be ok !
But that RM 3xx lens, even at f/8, still soft sweat.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 04:33 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
XS-pro hard to clean eh ? unsure.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 05:59 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Feb 21 2011, 05:27 PM)
ani gd UWA lens to re-commend...?
gd one...
if possible...
can be UWA @ DX & FX...
prefer wif zoom one...
no nid big aperature...
currently thinking nikon 16-35 or 12-24...
ani better choice...?
other brand oso can...
*
Tokina 11-16 or Nikkor 14-24
SIgma 12-24 also not bad.
Others, forget about it tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 06:09 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Str33tBoY @ Feb 21 2011, 06:05 PM)
Nikon 1635 not gd...?
as it kinda make up my mind adi...
i like d zoom range coverage...
as big aperature is not a need for me...
*
Use on FF good. On DX not that wide lo tongue.gif

TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 08:35 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 21 2011, 06:42 PM)
Been thinking, should i go with

35mm F/2, 50mm 1.4D and 85mm 1.4 (samyang, manual tongue.gif)

hmm.gif
*
35mm f/2 whistling.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 09:31 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
He well known for buy and sell and no photos tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:06 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
go naked flex.gif

TSKTCY
post Feb 21 2011, 10:08 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
24-70 will be the best choice when you at FF

TSKTCY
post Feb 22 2011, 07:00 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Feb 21 2011, 11:56 PM)
Guys, are the old fixed aperture telephoto nikkor lens reliable? Like 80-200mm f2.8. Which version is decent enough? Or better get the third party ones? Sharpness, bokeh & etc

Thinking of selling my 50mm f1.4 & 55-200mm for it. Rarely used the 50mm lens coz it's only sharp when going above f/2 (at least for my eyes).

hmm.gif
*
get 35mm f/2 la sharp at f/2. That's the reason I sold off 50mm 1.4 way back then smile.gif
80-200 is sharp but lack of VR tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 22 2011, 08:05 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
If FF, use Sigma 12-24 la. Widest available !
TSKTCY
post Feb 22 2011, 08:13 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 22 2011, 08:06 AM)
I don't have the nikon 50 1.4, I thought it would be sharp at f/2.

In a wedding & another event, I used a D90 with Nikon AFD 80200 f/2.8 two touch version & not the 2 previous models of the push pull version. It is sharp and built like a tank.. and it weighs like a tank too... I believe it is more durable & could withstand more hard knocks than newer lenses with SWM motor and VR.

Speed wise, newer lenses like 70200 VR & VR2 and the Sigma 70200 HSM focuses & locks focus faster. I tried an older version of Sigma 70200 HSM and it focuses really fast, & the latest version with OS would be much better I guess. Suitable for events, weddings & fast action stuffs. BUT KEEP IN MIND that the Tamron 70200 comes with a slow motor (micromotor) and focuses really slow. The Nikon 80200 is faster imo.

The older 80200 is damn nice but it is slower (don't know how much slower it is) compared to lenses with SWM/HSM motor like the 70200s. For portraits, outdoors the 80200 performs fast enough.

- If you really need the best with VR - Nikon 70200VRii or Nikon 70200VRi

- Still want fast focus with lower budget - Sigma 70200 (there's 2 current models with & without OS (VR equivalent) and if you want sigma, make sure you check the focusing because some tend to back/front focus)

- Don't really shoot fast moving objects but want tank like build quality & durability - Nikon AFD 80200 (two touch version) -NIKON-
*
sharp only at 2.2 and onwards !
Personally feel tho.
TSKTCY
post Feb 22 2011, 08:54 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 22 2011, 08:50 AM)
the starting point for the 80-200 would be the AF-D one ring version, around rm1.8k used.
after that i would jump straight to the 80-200 AF-S two touch...about rm4k used, ignoring the 80-200 AF-D two touch which sits in the middle of those two somewhere.
real men dont need VR  flex.gif
*
I know la. Comes in handy especially low light. Don't tell me you bring your monopod around when you shoot wedding whistling.gif

12 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0428sec    0.56    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 07:57 AM