Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nokia and Microsoft enter strategic alliance !, Symbian will be phased out, Meego stays

views
     
TShypermount
post Feb 11 2011, 04:13 PM, updated 15y ago

Patriot!
******
Senior Member
1,636 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Symbian and Meego will stay...they can't afford to alienate current symbian's huge user base of course.

http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-a...windows-phone-b

QUOTE
Amazing day, eh? Something many of us thought would never happen just hit the smartphone industry like a sweaty madman screaming at developers. But rest easy, even though Windows Phone 7 is being billed as Nokia's "primary smartphone platform," your OS hasn't suffered an untimely death, MeeGo and Symbian fans. Here's what Nokia has in store for MeeGo:

    "Under the new strategy, MeeGo becomes an open-source, mobile operating system project. MeeGo will place increased emphasis on longer-term market exploration of next-generation devices, platforms and user experiences. Nokia still plans to ship a MeeGo-related product later this year."

Likewise, Symbian isn't going away either:

    "With Nokia's planned move to Windows Phone as its primary smartphone platform, Symbian becomes a franchise platform, leveraging previous investments to harvest additional value. This strategy recognizes the opportunity to retain and transition the installed base of 200 million Symbian owners. Nokia expects to sell approximately 150 million more Symbian devices in the years to come"

Jo Harlow, new exec in charge of Smart Devices, will grab the MeeGo reins in addition to responsibility for Symbian Smartphones and and Strategic Business Operations.


This post has been edited by hypermount: Feb 14 2011, 08:22 AM
silverhawk
post Feb 11 2011, 04:16 PM

Eyes on Target
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


WP7 and Meego are in conflict, if they go with WP7, you can expect meego to "die". As a platform, nokia cannot have 2 competing products, they have to choose one. Sadly, it seems like they chose the inferior platform sad.gif


stimix
post Feb 11 2011, 04:35 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Wrong move.. Should have choose Android.

Well what to do, the current new boss was ex-microsoft...so he choose to alliance wth his own ex-boss.


41LY45
post Feb 11 2011, 04:39 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(silverhawk @ Feb 11 2011, 04:16 PM)
WP7 and Meego are in conflict, if they go with WP7, you can expect meego to "die". As a platform, nokia cannot have 2 competing products, they have to choose one. Sadly, it seems like they chose the inferior platform sad.gif
*
MeeGo = open source.
It won't die one. xdadevs will embrace it. brows.gif

QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 04:35 PM)
Wrong move.. Should have choose Android.

Well what to do, the current new boss was ex-microsoft...so he choose to alliance wth his own ex-boss.
*
MeeGo is based on linux and can run Android apps. I say i'll be a good competitor to Android.
But we'll see how it goes.
Dannyl
post Feb 11 2011, 05:01 PM

what the fucuk-yimai
*******
Senior Member
6,113 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pokey Oaks



QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 04:35 PM)
Wrong move.. Should have choose Android.

Well what to do, the current new boss was ex-microsoft...so he choose to alliance wth his own ex-boss.
*
Maybe he was planted there and this was Microsoft's goal. Now there's even more brand recognition for Microsoft.
stimix
post Feb 11 2011, 05:08 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Yeah...I also having the same feeling....more like reverse take over of Nokia by Microsoft
mych
post Feb 11 2011, 05:50 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,068 posts

Joined: Nov 2006


still can dual boot ma
nicholasbeh
post Feb 11 2011, 06:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
meego android dual boot?haha.
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 06:47 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



lol i can't believe Elop cited Android's "differentiation on that platform would have been very difficult for Nokia." Fragmentation eh?

And "The Microsoft option represented to us the best opportunity to build and join and fight within a new ecosystem."

http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/live-fr...dest&refresh=60

WP7 looks stagnant to me. At least there's nothing interesting in it to me.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 11 2011, 06:49 PM
nabelon
post Feb 11 2011, 08:14 PM

Walk of Life
******
Senior Member
1,714 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Taman Pekaka, Sg. Dua, Gelugor, Penang



He's a f***ing mole planted there by microsoft. What a prick, WP7 is not going to take them anywhere
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 08:55 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


If you read properly, MeeGo and Symbian is dead.
user posted image


Added on February 11, 2011, 8:57 pm
QUOTE(nabelon @ Feb 11 2011, 08:14 PM)
He's a f***ing mole planted there by microsoft. What a prick, WP7 is not going to take them anywhere
*
I'm not sure why WP7 not going to take them anywhere. Nokia need a OS that is better than iOS and Android.

WP7 is an OS which is better than Android and iOS.

Have you use a WP7 before?

Let me show you the UI:



Added on February 11, 2011, 8:58 pm
QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 04:35 PM)
Wrong move.. Should have choose Android.

Well what to do, the current new boss was ex-microsoft...so he choose to alliance wth his own ex-boss.
*
Android is wrong move actually. Android cannot provide differentiation product and make Nokia
look like another hardware maker. Also, Android is having legal issue now.

Furthermore, WP7 is better OS than iOS and of course much much better OS than Android.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 11 2011, 08:58 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 09:07 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



Wouldn't making a WP7 make Nokia even more of an 'another hardware maker'? WP7 offers no variation in terms of specs with its strict tech requirements. Look at all the WP7 phones out there. I can't tell the difference, other than one with AMOLED, one with physical keyboard. That's about it.

So in choosing WP7, it's more of choosing brand than choosing specs. You like a HTC WP7? Get the HD7! (Yeah I know mozart and the other one. Frankly I don't see the significant difference). Want a Samsung? Get the Omnia 7! Want an LG? Get the Optimus 7! What's the main difference between all these WP7 phones? You get the point.

There's no 'in between' in WP7. There is one WP7. It's sorta like making iPhones, but by many manufacturers. Same experience, everytime, in every one.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:09 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:07 PM)
Wouldn't making a WP7 make Nokia even more of an 'another hardware maker'? WP7 offers no variation in terms of specs with its strict tech requirements. Look at all the WP7 phones out there. I can't tell the difference, other than one with AMOLED, one with physical keyboard. That's about it.

So in choosing WP7, it's more of choosing brand than choosing specs. You like a HTC WP7? Get the HD7! (Yeah I know mozart and the other one. Frankly I don't see the significant difference). Want a Samsung? Get the Omnia 7! Want an LG? Get the Optimus 7! What's the main difference between all these WP7 phones? You get the point.

There's no 'in between' in WP7. There is one WP7. It's sorta like making iPhones, but by many manufacturers. Same experience, everytime, in every one.
*
Not really. Microsoft let Nokia tinker with WP7 even further. So Nokia can differentiate itself
from others.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-w...indows-phone-7/
QUOTE
That's a major shift for Microsoft, who forbade HTC from skinning Windows Phone 7 with Sense, something the Taiwanese company would surely have loved to do, and limited it to the introduction of a self-contained Hub. Now Nokia's saying it -- perhaps exclusively -- has been given the liberty to play around inside WP7 to its heart's content


So WP7 is the best choice. If Nokia goes for Android, then really facepalm. Since there's no Androidfag or Symbianfag here, i'm sure everyone will agree with me that WP7 is the best way forward. smile.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 11 2011, 09:10 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 09:25 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



If Microsoft really did allowed that (coz Elop backtracked saying they won't tinker too much, probably coz he probably said it without consulting Balmer first), HTC and other manufacturers will be looking for similar privileges too, or else WP7 on these brands will be a one-off, and WP7 will be left to one brand. And depends on how it develops, will either be a Nokia-Symbian kind of domination in the 2005 era, or WP7 will fizzle out and make MS decide to close down it's mobile OS division.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:30 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:25 PM)
If Microsoft really did allowed that (coz Elop backtracked saying they won't tinker too much, probably coz he probably said it without consulting Balmer first), HTC and other manufacturers will be looking for similar privileges too, or else WP7 on these brands will be a one-off, and WP7 will be left to one brand. And depends on how it develops, will either be a Nokia-Symbian kind of domination in the 2005 era, or WP7 will fizzle out and make MS decide to close down it's mobile OS division.
*
Nope. Microsoft won't let WP7 die so fast. Xbox example lose a lot of money but Microsoft still went ahead and do Xbox 360 which is a success. Now Xbox revenue more than Windows revenue. You forgot that Microsoft and Nokia is huge company with large amount of capitalization and expertise.

Elop did not backtracked. He said he will not change that much. But he definitely confirm Nokia can change anything. Unless you're
Androidfag, you won't pour cold water on this right? brows.gif
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 09:39 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



HTC once said they're allowed to customise WP7 too. Rumors were flying about how they're going to implement Sense on WP7. In the end all they had was a HTC Hub. Yay?

MS won't let WP7 die, but WP7 will die on it's own if this trend of not-interesting-ness of WP7 continues.

Wouldn't talk about XBOX coz I'm a non-gamer. But AFAIK XBOX was a success, but only because of Halo.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 11 2011, 09:40 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:41 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:39 PM)
HTC once said they're allowed to customise WP7 too. In the end all they had was a HTC Hub. Yay?

MS won't let WP7 die, but WP7 will die on it's own if this trend of not-interesting-ness of WP7 continues.

Wouldn't talk about XBOX coz I'm a non-gamer. But AFAIK XBOX was a success, but only because of Halo.
*
not really bro. XBox success because the multiplayer experience is great.

Not interestingness because got WP7 get bad treatment from manufacturer of phone such as HTC.
HTC allowed to customise but cannot use their sense UI. HTC Hub was added as differentiation product.
Not sure what's the "yay" for though.


Added on February 11, 2011, 9:42 pmand also, with Nokia on board, the interest will be very very high since Nokia will build the best mobile phone for Windows and concentrate doing that only for WP7.



This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 11 2011, 09:42 PM
stimix
post Feb 11 2011, 09:42 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



I'm ex-WM user-lor..And I hate that platform long time ago..WP7 although i hv not used it b4 but from the Youtube clip, the iu dun looks good and I stil prefer S^3 in N8.

Furthermore, I heard WP7 having connectivity problem similar to Ios i.e you can't BT file trf, can't connect via USB & copy & paste proble. On current S^#, trf of files via BT are superb & even you can opy & paste whatever files via USB and even a thumbdrive. I dun think any other platforms having these right now...Well..hopefully Nokia on WP7 in future
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:44 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 09:42 PM)
I'm ex-WM user-lor..And I hate that platform long time ago..WP7 although i hv not used it b4 but from the Youtube clip, the iu dun looks good and I stil prefer S^3 in N8.

Furthermore, I heard WP7 having connectivity problem similar to Ios i.e you can't BT file trf, can't connect via USB & copy & paste proble. On current S^#, trf of files via BT are superb & even you can opy & paste whatever files via USB  and even a thumbdrive. I dun think any other platforms having these right now...Well..hopefully Nokia on WP7 in future
*
i have multiple phones and one of it still using Winmo 6.1. I really hate it.

We all hope the best for Nokia la... thumbup.gif
iipohbee
post Feb 11 2011, 09:44 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Nokia is definitely going downhill.

It makes sense that their next route would be MS WP7 which centers around the Indian software community and Nokia users are mostly Indians.

If you look at Windows Phone Ads the front screen shows an Indian photo album!

user posted image

While Android development community is more Chinese oriented. Google Android Lab is based in Taipei.
Google establishes Android team in Taiwan
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10194652-94.html


SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:46 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(iipohbee @ Feb 11 2011, 09:44 PM)
Nokia is definitely going downhill.

It makes sense that their next route would be MS WP7 which centers around the Indian software community and Nokia users are mostly Indians.

If you look at Windows Phone Ads the front screen shows an Indian photo album!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

While Android development community is more Chinese oriented. Google Android Lab is based in Taipei.
Google establishes Android team in Taiwan
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10194652-94.html
*
racist people detected. this is not kopitiam bro.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 11 2011, 09:47 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 09:47 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:41 PM)
not really bro. XBox success because the multiplayer experience is great.

Not interestingness because got WP7 get bad treatment from manufacturer of phone such as HTC.
HTC allowed to customise but cannot use their sense UI. HTC Hub was added as differentiation product.
Not sure what's the "yay" for though.
What I'm saying is the HTC Hub is the most HTC can 'customise' their version of WP7. You also said HTC was apparently allowed to 'customise' and all they get to do was add HTC Hub. The 'yay' was an awkward celebration for the existence of an apparent ability to customise WP7 by manufacturers.

In case my overuse of the word "apparent" confused you, apparent means "something that does not exist". Apparently means "thought to be so but wasn't".

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 11 2011, 09:50 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:51 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:47 PM)
What I'm saying is the HTC Hub is the most HTC can 'customise' their version of WP7. You also said HTC was apparently allowed to 'customise' and all they get to do was add HTC Hub. The 'yay' was an awkward celebration for the existence of an apparent ability to customise WP7 by manufacturers.
*
I did not say that HTC can customise. Please point out where ???
So its kinda weird you put yay too. Apparently in the link I give you, it say HTC cannot customise.

You start to talk weird now. sweat.gif
stimix
post Feb 11 2011, 09:53 PM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



One bad things on Symbian currently & in the past is slow boot-up time, Not so good multi-touch comparing wth ifon, and also the worst Internet browser compare wth others..

Hopefully wth WP7, they can posper more and solve those mysteries..Their superb ovimaps covering almsot everywhere in the world, superb GPS chipset & the superb camera are Nokia good point during Symbian era...
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 09:55 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



Read the bolded part. You said it yourself.

QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:41 PM)
not really bro. XBox success because the multiplayer experience is great.

Not interestingness because got WP7 get bad treatment from manufacturer of phone such as HTC.
HTC allowed to customise but cannot use their sense UI. HTC Hub was added as differentiation product.
Not sure what's the "yay" for though.
In July 2010 HTC said the same about them being given the green light to 'customise'. HTC Hub was all they can do.

http://www.biggtech.com/mobile/htc-will-cu...sense_2308.html

What link are you talking about?

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 11 2011, 09:57 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 09:56 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 09:53 PM)
One bad things on Symbian currently & in the past is slow boot-up time, Not so good multi-touch comparing wth ifon, and also the worst Internet browser  compare wth others..

Hopefully wth WP7, they can posper more and solve those mysteries..Their superb ovimaps covering almsot everywhere in the world, superb GPS chipset & the superb camera are Nokia good point during Symbian era...
*
thats why in the new alliance, Ovi Map is ported in to WP7.
GPS and camera no need to say is from Nokia.

While Microsoft provide the OS for multi touch, fast boot, and great internet browser experience...

All I can say is ....


THIS IS FULL OF WIN!!!!


Added on February 11, 2011, 9:59 pm
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 09:55 PM)
Read the bolded part
In July 2010 HTC said the same about them being given the green light to 'customise'. HTC Hub was all they can do.

http://www.biggtech.com/mobile/htc-will-cu...sense_2308.html

What link are you talking about?
*
This means that HTC cakap besar saying they can customize.

But Nokia is different. This is alliance. Integrating software between two manufacturer.

This is gang up bro. Different with HTC putting in WP7 into HD2 to become HD7 and tweak a bit of the hardware.

That's why Microsoft hate all the WP7 manufacturer. They need a partner. And Nokia came along....

ITS JUST SO FULL OF WIN

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 11 2011, 09:59 PM
SUSCELCOM.AXIATA
post Feb 11 2011, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
151 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


at the moment & long term future, joining forces of 2 titans nokia and windows mobile represent de greatest threat to android.
in a few years once their partnership is established, high-end smartphone market will be dominated by apple wt IOS and nokia with Windows phone.

android is like a headless chicken, initially going fast & everywhere but very soon will die easily.
simply bcoz de android marketplace is too lousy.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 10:04 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(CELCOM.AXIATA @ Feb 11 2011, 10:01 PM)
at the moment & long term future, joining forces of 2 titans nokia and windows mobile represent de greatest threat to android.
in a few years once their partnership is established, high-end smartphone market will be dominated by apple wt IOS and nokia with Windows phone.

android is like a headless chicken, initially going fast & everywhere but very soon will die easily.
simply bcoz de android marketplace is too lousy.
*
true true...

Also, if you read this http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/11/did_google..._own_enemi.html

Google probably will not earn money in the future... lol
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 10:10 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



Google made so much money from else where they can buy companies and put their products up for free, and in the process make even more money.

What my previous post was saying is Nokia probably made the same slip of tongue about customisability. And in what article did you read that Microsoft hated the other WP7 manufacturers? Do you know what consequence that would lead to in terms of partnership opportunity? Or you just made that up?
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 10:17 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 10:10 PM)
Google made so much money from else where they can buy companies and put their products up for free, and in the process make even more money.

What my previous post was saying is Nokia probably made the same slip of tongue about customisability. And in what article did you read that Microsoft hated the other WP7 manufacturers? Do you know what consequence that would lead to in terms of partnership opportunity? Or you just made that up?
*
Slip tongue? Nope.. this is different bro... you dunno how this partnership is???? its so huge...and deep

Apple dun need partnership opportunity. So microsoft and Nokia dun need others too.

Microsoft + Nokia will just come out with 1 device to pawn all Android device like what Apple is doing.
DJFoo000
post Feb 11 2011, 10:26 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



lol you're putting your hopes too much in the future, while the a lot of us are looking at the track record. I have presented what I came to present. Have fun hoping for that copy and paste feature on the Nokia WP7.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 11 2011, 10:28 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 11 2011, 10:26 PM)
lol you're putting your hopes too much in the future, while the a lot of us are looking at the track record. I have presented what I came to present. Have fun hoping for that copy and paste feature on the Nokia WP7.
*
Its not hoping bro. Its coming out in March.

Of course we hope for the future.

Looking at track record is only for fanboy bro.... we look at what the manufacturer come out and buy accordingly...

you're not buying business bro... u just buy gadget.. track record is not determine what you buy in the future... icon_rolleyes.gif
SUSCELCOM.AXIATA
post Feb 11 2011, 10:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
151 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


it is like this.
nokia possess capability to produce phones wt great design and hardware, but their weakness is software eco-systyem.
while windows 7 mobile possess great potential in software.
this is best partnership especially considering the resources of both companies.
Andrew Lim
post Feb 11 2011, 11:24 PM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


I'll believe a WP7 Nokia phone will be a success only when it happens. I have too many doubts about that coming true now.
Reasons:
- WP7 is still immature, missing a lot of features (e.g. copy and paste, multi-tasking) that exist in iOS and Android.
- Nokia has said they'll need time to make a WP7 phone. I expect earliest you can see one at the end of this year. But that time Android would be entrenched even further with more high end phones and Ice Cream Sandwich released.
41LY45
post Feb 12 2011, 12:29 AM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Feb 11 2011, 11:24 PM)
I'll believe a WP7 Nokia phone will be a success only when it happens. I have too many doubts about that coming true now.
Reasons:
- WP7 is still immature, missing a lot of features (e.g. copy and paste, multi-tasking) that exist in iOS and Android.
- Nokia has said they'll need time to make a WP7 phone. I expect earliest you can see one at the end of this year. But that time Android would be entrenched even further with more high end phones and Ice Cream Sandwich released.
*
QFT.


lch78
post Feb 12 2011, 12:41 AM

b.e.y.o.n.d.r.e.a.l.m.s
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Edge Of D. World


Now is still too early to argue about the impact of Nokia WP7 in the future. Let Nokia comes out a WP7 phone first.

IMO, Vic Gundotra might be wrong about "two turkeys do not make an eagle". If Nokia WP7 is successful, Nokia will be the turkey, and MS is the eagle dining the turkey.

SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 12:47 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Feb 11 2011, 11:24 PM)
I'll believe a WP7 Nokia phone will be a success only when it happens. I have too many doubts about that coming true now.
Reasons:
- WP7 is still immature, missing a lot of features (e.g. copy and paste, multi-tasking) that exist in iOS and Android.
- Nokia has said they'll need time to make a WP7 phone. I expect earliest you can see one at the end of this year. But that time Android would be entrenched even further with more high end phones and Ice Cream Sandwich released.
*
It depends. Nothing last forever. Last time we also dun think Nokia will fall like this.
Now you dun think Android will die. But believe me. Next year, Nokia WP7 will conquer the
word. That time you'll eat back your own word.

QUOTE(lch78 @ Feb 12 2011, 12:41 AM)
Now is still too early to argue about the impact of Nokia WP7 in the future. Let Nokia comes out a WP7 phone first.

IMO, Vic Gundotra might be wrong about "two turkeys do not make an eagle". If Nokia WP7 is successful, Nokia will be the turkey, and MS is the eagle dining the turkey.
*
I believe Nokia and MS become eagle while Android is turkey.
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 12 2011, 03:55 AM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 11 2011, 09:53 PM)
One bad things on Symbian currently & in the past is slow boot-up time, Not so good multi-touch comparing wth ifon, and also the worst Internet browser  compare wth others..

Hopefully wth WP7, they can posper more and solve those mysteries..Their superb ovimaps covering almsot everywhere in the world, superb GPS chipset & the superb camera are Nokia good point during Symbian era...
*
+1.

Now, Nokia is taking a very big gamble to turn around the tables. While i am still quite skeptical about the decision, but only god knows what Nokia and Microsoft can roll out.

The issue bugging me about migrating to Android is because of the hardware manufacturer. Each of them have the cons that i am not yet ready to accept it fully and they are expensive.
cy97
post Feb 12 2011, 09:54 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,140 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
As the CEO mentioned in his speech, Nokia discount Android due to the fact that Nokia is too late to adopt Android n the difficulty in term of differentiation ! To me it is all bullshit why would u dump something good because due to ur own mistake in getting it earlier! When it is good, you should embrace it no matter how late. As Indians still dominate Microsoft, you would never see great thing come out of it. I m sure the CEO will lose his job come next year! Let's wait n see!

I still believe Nokia should do it themselves like Apple did! Put more effort to develop Meego n not hide below the shadow of another loser, Microsoft! Put two losers together u get what?

Sony Erricsson is a good example!
iipohbee
post Feb 12 2011, 11:16 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
This alliance is nothing without the support of the East Asian countries - China, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan.
Nokia has never gain much entry there and Android is always their preferred mobile OS platform.

While with the console market Microsoft can pump in enough money to overtake the Playstation, the Android is another story,

Behind the Android is giant Google, Samsung, Sony, HTC, China Inc.

This post has been edited by iipohbee: Feb 12 2011, 11:17 AM
SUSCELCOM.AXIATA
post Feb 12 2011, 11:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
151 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


android alliance will not survive long. very soon nobody will develop games or apps for it bcos no control & lack profits.
Andrew Lim
post Feb 12 2011, 11:36 AM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 12:47 AM)
But believe me. Next year, Nokia WP7 will conquer the
word. That time you'll eat back your own word.
I believe Nokia and MS become eagle while Android is turkey.
*
I'll bookmark this page so that next year I can eat my words. smile.gif

Or laugh and laugh at your post. biggrin.gif thumbup.gif
gstoh
post Feb 12 2011, 11:49 AM

INTJ
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: penang
I will not say Nokia&M$ will beat down Google.
Since google's strength is its FREE services offered. Besides that a lot of apps in google market are free too.
But one thing I don't like about the android is that android has too many different customized versions by manufacturers. That's why we cannot get the new update instantly when google annouces new version of android.

So perhaps Nokia and M$ can learn from the weakness of android and avoid it in their own products. Do it like Apple. when announce the new version, all devices with same platform are allowed to update immediately.
Perhaps Nokia can also integrate its Ovi map to WP7 to offer FREE Offline GPS in their products. This is a great advantage over the other WP7 phones =)

I believe NokiaM$ will create competitive products/services in future to fight with iOS and Android.
SUSMatrix
post Feb 12 2011, 11:56 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Feb 12 2011, 11:36 AM)
I'll bookmark this page so that next year I can eat my words.  smile.gif

Or laugh and laugh at your post.  biggrin.gif  thumbup.gif
*
I'll join you to laugh. thumbup.gif
iipohbee
post Feb 12 2011, 12:13 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(CELCOM.AXIATA @ Feb 12 2011, 11:26 AM)
android alliance will not survive long. very soon nobody will develop games or apps for it bcos no control & lack profits.
*
Android apps/games is only 2nd to Apple iOS and fast catching on.

Older Nokia phones will also not be able to work with NoWin phones until the next batches are out.
They are way behind Android development community

Did you know that WinMo phones are useless? Many of my friends say their WinMo phones frequently drop calls and apps are just crap.
No one wants to pay royalty to M$soft without given the freedom.

My guess is many will buy the NoWin phones and hack them to install other Unix platforms such as Android/Meego/Linux eventually.


Added on February 12, 2011, 12:16 pm
QUOTE(gstoh @ Feb 12 2011, 11:49 AM)
I believe NokiaM$ will create competitive products/services in future to fight with iOS and Android.
*
How can you call it competitive when M$ refuses to lower their Windows software prices when Linux is free?
M$soft has never stepped back when it comes to charging for their Win apps. NoWin phones won't be priced competitively because their phones will include WP7 OS pricing added as well.

This post has been edited by iipohbee: Feb 12 2011, 12:16 PM
cy97
post Feb 12 2011, 12:17 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,140 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
These some views to ponder.....
user posted image


Nokia share drops 14% since announcement made!


user posted image


Finns' reaction to this!


user posted image

This decision is not fully endorsed by Nokia Board of Directors yet! flex.gif

This post has been edited by cy97: Feb 12 2011, 12:23 PM
gstoh
post Feb 12 2011, 12:43 PM

INTJ
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: penang
QUOTE(iipohbee @ Feb 12 2011, 12:13 PM)
Android apps/games is only 2nd to Apple iOS and fast catching on.

Older Nokia phones will also not be able to work with NoWin phones until the next batches are out.
They are way behind Android development community

Did you know that WinMo phones are useless? Many of my friends say their WinMo phones frequently drop calls and apps are just crap.
No one wants to pay royalty to M$soft without given the freedom.

My guess is many will buy the NoWin phones and hack them to install other Unix platforms such as Android/Meego/Linux eventually.


Added on February 12, 2011, 12:16 pm

How can you call it competitive when M$ refuses to lower their Windows software prices when Linux is free?
M$soft has never stepped back when it comes to charging for their Win apps. NoWin phones won't be priced competitively because their phones will include WP7 OS pricing added as well.
*
lets be more realistic
alliance implied that m$ will offer some privileges to Nokia perhaps cheaper license ?
apart from that, let's see how much the similar spec of WP7 phone and android phone cost? they are not much different.
for instance, HTC Desire and HTC 7 Mozart, both of their retail price are not much different(HTC Desire is slightly cheaper). However, 7 Mozart is little bit better in term of spec.
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPho...0&idPhone2=3077

apart from that, WP7 is very smooth, is able to match with iOS. biggrin.gif
one thing is lack in WP7 is openness.

This post has been edited by gstoh: Feb 12 2011, 12:45 PM
lch78
post Feb 12 2011, 12:53 PM

b.e.y.o.n.d.r.e.a.l.m.s
*******
Senior Member
2,114 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
From: Edge Of D. World


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 01:47 AM)
It depends. Nothing last forever. Last time we also dun think Nokia will fall like this.
Now you dun think Android will die. But believe me. Next year, Nokia WP7 will conquer the
world
. That time you'll eat back your own word.
I believe Nokia and MS become eagle while Android is turkey.
*
Nokia CEO has his reasons to enter into such arrangement with MS. But if he is smarter, he should instead use all WP7, Android & Symbian concurrently and let the software developers fight for Nokia attention. Then Nokia will be the winner.

By entering into exclusivity deal with MS will limit Nokia options to expand. Most likely, it is Nokia who helps MS to expand in the early years rather than the other way round. MS intention is to make money through software updates like in the PC market. I still remember last time when I want to upgrade my pda WinMo6.1 to WinMo6.5, they wanted to charge me RM126 for WinMo6.5 OS licence!!

And if the scenario (GREEN texts) you put up is true in the future, the real turkey will be you and other WP7 users, and MS will be the one dining turkey out of your wallet. tongue.gif
wuwah
post Feb 12 2011, 03:06 PM

ai ai ai~
******
Senior Member
1,153 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Malaysia, Perlis



user posted image
looking good? actually, after I did saw myself how really is w7 phones in youtube, they are quite interested to be tested hmm.gif
source of picture http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/exclusi...ncept-revealed/
Getz
post Feb 12 2011, 03:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
390 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



It kinda look cool but we'll see
cy97
post Feb 12 2011, 04:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,140 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
Microsoft is really suck ! Want to make my mic working on my pc also so difficult ! Apple is really cool ! And not fragmented at all!

randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 04:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(CELCOM.AXIATA @ Feb 12 2011, 11:26 AM)
android alliance will not survive long. very soon nobody will develop games or apps for it bcos no control & lack profits.
*
What about Xperia Play? And Playstation Suite? Are they running on WP7?
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 12 2011, 05:07 PM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(gstoh @ Feb 12 2011, 11:49 AM)
I will not say Nokia&M$ will beat down Google.
Since google's strength is its FREE services offered. Besides that a lot of apps in google market are free too.
But one thing I don't like about the android is that android has too many different customized versions by manufacturers. That's why we cannot get the new update instantly when google annouces new version of android.

So perhaps Nokia and M$ can learn from the weakness of android and avoid it in their own products. Do it like Apple. when announce the new version, all devices with same platform are allowed to update immediately.
Perhaps Nokia can also integrate its Ovi map to WP7 to offer FREE Offline GPS in their products. This is a great advantage over the other WP7 phones =)

I believe NokiaM$ will create competitive products/services in future to fight with iOS and Android.
*
If Nokia did not integrate the Ovi maps into their mobile phones, it would be a big waste for them since they acquire the company that is specialize in navigating and mapping services.

For Android, I am still surveying for the suitable hardware manufacturer for me to invest in.

Hopefully the alliance will boost back the Nokia position.

QUOTE(lch78 @ Feb 12 2011, 12:53 PM)
Nokia CEO has his reasons to enter into such arrangement with MS. But if he is smarter, he should instead use all WP7, Android & Symbian concurrently and let the software developers fight for Nokia attention. Then Nokia will be the winner.

By entering into exclusivity deal with MS will limit Nokia options to expand. Most likely, it is Nokia who helps MS to expand in the early years rather than the other way round. MS intention is to make money through software updates like in the PC market. I still remember last time when I want to upgrade my pda WinMo6.1 to WinMo6.5, they wanted to charge me RM126 for WinMo6.5 OS licence!!

And if the scenario (GREEN texts) you put up is true in the future, the real turkey will be you and other WP7 users, and MS will be the one dining turkey out of your wallet.  tongue.gif
*
+100.

QUOTE(cy97 @ Feb 12 2011, 04:03 PM)
Microsoft is really suck ! Want to make my mic working on my pc also so difficult ! Apple is really cool ! And not fragmented at all!
*
Are you sure that it is the Windows fault? It might be hardware issues as well.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 06:18 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


Latest news:

With Nokia and Microsoft alliance, WP7 will be changed to have this feature by end of 2011 with Nokia
will be the phone come out with the latest build of WP7:
QUOTE
multitask
system-wide file manager
Bluetooth file transfers
USB mass storage mode
Running apps switcher
Custom ringtones
No copy/paste
GPS + Turn By Turn + Integration with ovi maps
HTML5
Flash and Silverlight support in the web browser
Record calls & sounds
Video Calling
VoIP Calling
music player equalisers
multi sensor
search in contact
Also, Microsoft and Nokia confirm that fragmentation will not happen because Nokia will set the minimum
hardware standard that all other manufacturer need to follow.

I believe Microsoft and Nokia will become future of mobile phone.... yahooo
DJFoo000
post Feb 12 2011, 06:28 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



'by end of 2011'. When that time comes, I doubt if Nokia's shares are still worth any money. And Android phones will be breathing fire by that time.

Fragmentation will not be a problem for WP7 (lol I dun remember anyone saying WP7 has that issue). The problem with WP7 is VARIETY. Making one device is not what Nokia needed to bounce back. Nokia will lose it's budget range smartphone sector.

Seeing as how Nokia failed to enter the netbook market with its Booklet 3G (remember this guy?), Nokia cannot afford another failed venture.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 06:57 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 06:28 PM)
'by end of 2011'. When that time comes, I doubt if Nokia's shares are still worth any money. And Android phones will be breathing fire by that time.

Fragmentation will not be a problem for WP7 (lol I dun remember anyone saying WP7 has that issue). The problem with WP7 is VARIETY. Making one device is not what Nokia needed to bounce back. Nokia will lose it's budget range smartphone sector.

Seeing as how Nokia failed to enter the netbook market with its Booklet 3G (remember this guy?), Nokia cannot afford another failed venture.
*
Don't worry. Be happy.

FYI, Nokia and Microsoft combine have a lot of cash. laugh.gif
gstoh
post Feb 12 2011, 07:09 PM

INTJ
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: penang
QUOTE(lch78 @ Feb 12 2011, 12:53 PM)
Nokia CEO has his reasons to enter into such arrangement with MS. But if he is smarter, he should instead use all WP7, Android & Symbian concurrently and let the software developers fight for Nokia attention. Then Nokia will be the winner.

By entering into exclusivity deal with MS will limit Nokia options to expand. Most likely, it is Nokia who helps MS to expand in the early years rather than the other way round. MS intention is to make money through software updates like in the PC market. I still remember last time when I want to upgrade my pda WinMo6.1 to WinMo6.5, they wanted to charge me RM126 for WinMo6.5 OS licence!!

And if the scenario (GREEN texts) you put up is true in the future, the real turkey will be you and other WP7 users, and MS will be the one dining turkey out of your wallet.  tongue.gif
*
Nokia is not going to do that, symbian is weak, and Android is too common from different manufacturers. Since Nokia is left behind from other manufacturers in term of RnD and experience in Android. Furthermore, even in the same platform Android, Nokia is very hard to compete with its competitors, they can only compete in term of hardware features. This will cost Nokia a lot $$$ in order to gain the crown.
Besides that, I think Nokia is focusing on quality rather than quantity. if too many platforms for nokia to develop, it will cost Nokia a lot $ and the quality is still unknown. But I believe Nokia will still continue Symbian for mid and low end market.

WP7 is good choice for nokia.
why?
it is rare, motorola and SE don't even have a wp7 concept device. HTC LG and Samsung have it but the number of models is still limited. It means that there is still a chance for Nokia to compete with others in this platform.
the new wp7 provides smoother interface than Android. The limited features we knows such as copy and paste soon will be released too.
The update is controlled by M$ and hence you can get update directly from M$. I can see that M$ is also focusing on the wp7 quality. They are slowly releasing good quality features through update rather than throwing you a bunch of buggy features.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 07:16 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(gstoh @ Feb 12 2011, 07:09 PM)
Nokia is not going to do that, symbian is weak, and Android is too common from different manufacturers. Since Nokia is left behind from other manufacturers in term of RnD and experience in Android. Furthermore, even in the same platform Android, Nokia is very hard to compete with its competitors, they can only compete in term of hardware features. This will cost Nokia a lot $$$ in order to gain the crown.
Besides that, I think Nokia is focusing on quality rather than quantity. if too many platforms for nokia to develop, it will cost Nokia a lot $ and the quality is still unknown. But I believe Nokia will still continue Symbian for mid and low end market.

WP7 is good choice for nokia.
why?
it is rare, motorola and SE don't even have a wp7 concept device. HTC LG and Samsung have it but the number of models is still limited. It means that there is still a chance for Nokia to compete with others in this platform.
the new wp7 provides smoother interface than Android. The limited features we knows such as copy and paste soon will be released too.
The update is controlled by M$ and hence you can get update directly from M$. I can see that M$ is also focusing on the wp7 quality. They are slowly releasing good quality features through update rather than throwing you a bunch of buggy features.
*
Actually those that bash Nokia and Microsoft marriage are only 3 types:
a) user of other OS such as Android and iOS. We call them Androidfag and iFag
b) user of original Nokia Symbian/Meego/Maemo OS. We called them butthurtfag laugh.gif
c) haters of Microsoft

I believe they are combination of a) and b) or b) and c). icon_rolleyes.gif


Added on February 12, 2011, 7:18 pmby the way, Androidfag and iFag raging now because deep inside their heart:
a) Androidfag failed to get Nokia hardware which is acknowledged to be the best in the world to use Android. So they are really really butthurt yo coz they are stuck with lousy handphone maker
b) iFag actually think that WP7 UI is quite good. They feel threaten yo.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 12 2011, 07:18 PM
randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 07:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 07:16 PM)
Actually those that bash Nokia and Microsoft marriage are only 3 types:
a) user of other OS such as Android and iOS. We call them Androidfag and iFag
b) user of original Nokia Symbian/Meego/Maemo OS. We called them butthurtfag  laugh.gif
c) haters of Microsoft

I believe they are combination of a) and b) or b) and c).  icon_rolleyes.gif
a) really? even those aunties and uncles who know nothing about the OS they're using? XD my gf's dad is using Xperia X10 mini pro...and he knows nothing about the OS...he just said, "WOW it's SOOO FAST!!! COMPARED TO SO MANY PHONES I'VE USED IN MY LIFE in 20 years!!!"

b) this i agree with you, symbian is usable, but it's outdated, especially its interface, they shud get on with it...

c) i'm a Microsoft hater but a Nokia lover, so errr......i hate Microsoft for their dirty business tactics, how they say Linux is inferior to M$ software when their software itself is flawed, and how they treat Linux users...i love Linux but I did not hate Microsoft, until i got deeper into the Linux world and learned about how Microsoft treated Linux...but funny, when it comes to hardware, i don't mind at all...i'm using a M$ mouse, and i dream of getting an Arc Mouse...so err?

and what do you mean lousy handphone maker?

- Samsung makes lousy handphones?
- Sony Ericsson makes lousy handphones?
- LG makes lousy handphones?
- Motorola makes lousy handphones?
- HTC makes lousy handphones?

so everybody makes lousy handphones except Nokia?

or you're saying that lousy handphone makers use android in their phones too? like those cheap shanzai phones from china, which many are utilizing android as their main OS instead of MTK because android is free and can be customized easily to their needs?

Just so that you know, the number of these shanzai handphone makers don't represent the majority of handphone makers....they don't represent quality handphone makers...

So what do you call people who love Microsoft and refuse to know and learn the truth behind things? Microfag? Smallfag? Picofag? Femtofag?

soon, somebody might just say, Microkiafag butthurt coz even after Microkia marriage happened and rolled out their awesome product running WP7 and hardware from Nokia they still fail to get even a significant % of market share.



This post has been edited by randytsx: Feb 12 2011, 07:52 PM
arezz
post Feb 12 2011, 07:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
569 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Kuching Miow...



no more nokia after this. their reign is over
ViRaViRa
post Feb 12 2011, 08:02 PM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(arezz @ Feb 12 2011, 07:48 PM)
no more nokia after this. their reign is over
*
Too early to predict.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 08:08 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 07:39 PM)
a) really? even those aunties and uncles who know nothing about the OS they're using? XD my gf's dad is using Xperia X10 mini pro...and he knows nothing about the OS...he just said, "WOW it's SOOO FAST!!! COMPARED TO SO MANY PHONES I'VE USED IN MY LIFE in 20 years!!!"

b) this i agree with you, symbian is usable, but it's outdated, especially its interface, they shud get on with it...

c) i'm a Microsoft hater but a Nokia lover, so errr......i hate Microsoft for their dirty business tactics, how they say Linux is inferior to M$ software when their software itself is flawed, and how they treat Linux users...i love Linux but I did not hate Microsoft, until i got deeper into the Linux world and learned about how Microsoft treated Linux...but funny, when it comes to hardware, i don't mind at all...i'm using a M$ mouse, and i dream of getting an Arc Mouse...so err?

and what do you mean lousy handphone maker?

- Samsung makes lousy handphones?
- Sony Ericsson makes lousy handphones?
- LG makes lousy handphones?
- Motorola makes lousy handphones?
- HTC makes lousy handphones?

so everybody makes lousy handphones except Nokia?

or you're saying that lousy handphone makers use android in their phones too? like those cheap shanzai phones from china, which many are utilizing android as their main OS instead of MTK because android is free and can be customized easily to their needs?

Just so that you know, the number of these shanzai handphone makers don't represent the majority of handphone makers....they don't represent quality handphone makers...

So what do you call people who love Microsoft and refuse to know and learn the truth behind things? Microfag? Smallfag? Picofag? Femtofag?

soon, somebody might just say, Microkiafag butthurt coz even after Microkia marriage happened and rolled out their awesome product running WP7 and hardware from Nokia they still fail to get even a significant % of market share.
*
Example is HTC really make lousy handphones. Just look at the camera and GPS. Lousy compare to Nokia.
Just accept the fact that only Nokia can make gooding hardware yo. smile.gif

Well, soon is future. Let's see how it work out. But I have good feeling in this.

Also, you hate M$ because of their business tactic? hahahahahahahahahaha ... tat's really ... laughable yo
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 12 2011, 08:17 PM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 07:39 PM)
a) really? even those aunties and uncles who know nothing about the OS they're using? XD my gf's dad is using Xperia X10 mini pro...and he knows nothing about the OS...he just said, "WOW it's SOOO FAST!!! COMPARED TO SO MANY PHONES I'VE USED IN MY LIFE in 20 years!!!"

b) this i agree with you, symbian is usable, but it's outdated, especially its interface, they shud get on with it...

c) i'm a Microsoft hater but a Nokia lover, so errr......i hate Microsoft for their dirty business tactics, how they say Linux is inferior to M$ software when their software itself is flawed, and how they treat Linux users...i love Linux but I did not hate Microsoft, until i got deeper into the Linux world and learned about how Microsoft treated Linux...but funny, when it comes to hardware, i don't mind at all...i'm using a M$ mouse, and i dream of getting an Arc Mouse...so err?

and what do you mean lousy handphone maker?

- Samsung makes lousy handphones?
- Sony Ericsson makes lousy handphones?
- LG makes lousy handphones?
- Motorola makes lousy handphones?
- HTC makes lousy handphones?

so everybody makes lousy handphones except Nokia?

or you're saying that lousy handphone makers use android in their phones too? like those cheap shanzai phones from china, which many are utilizing android as their main OS instead of MTK because android is free and can be customized easily to their needs?

Just so that you know, the number of these shanzai handphone makers don't represent the majority of handphone makers....they don't represent quality handphone makers...

So what do you call people who love Microsoft and refuse to know and learn the truth behind things? Microfag? Smallfag? Picofag? Femtofag?

soon, somebody might just say, Microkiafag butthurt coz even after Microkia marriage happened and rolled out their awesome product running WP7 and hardware from Nokia they still fail to get even a significant % of market share.
*
Symbian is an established OS for me. Apple and Android offers something better.

At the same time, Nokia have to look out for their product quality. Cheap phone with unattractive specification is reasonable, but high end phone that suffer a lot of issues after released? That is something Nokia have to look out. Users are not guinea pigs. N97 and N8 are the proof.

Nokia is famous, so any problem that is related with them also being trumpet loudly.

randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 08:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 08:08 PM)
Example is HTC really make lousy handphones. Just look at the camera and GPS. Lousy compare to Nokia.
Just accept the fact that only Nokia can make gooding hardware yo. smile.gif

Well, soon is future. Let's see how it work out. But I have good feeling in this.

Also, you hate M$ because of their business tactic? hahahahahahahahahaha ... tat's really ... laughable yo
*
So, you buy phones only for GPS and camera? Then why get a phone at all?

Yes as the future unfolds we will all see.

Seems like you don't know anything, as though your knowledge is built upon advertisements and other marketing ads. That's why you can so casually laugh at the matter
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 08:48 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 08:39 PM)
So, you buy phones only for GPS and camera? Then why get a phone at all?

Yes as the future unfolds we will all see.

Seems like you don't know anything, as though your knowledge is built upon advertisements and other marketing ads. That's why you can so casually laugh at the matter
*
Nokia made 100% good phone. So having a good GPS and camera means Nokia is great camera maker and HTC is lousy camera make
which I have said earlier. I just reply a question. I don't mean to say phone is for GPS and camera. Don't put words into my mouth.

I laugh at the matters because I buy phone that is good. Not based on how M$ do their business last time. That's why I'm laughing
at him and now I'm laughing at you now. You guys are like those idiot tat boycott Jews product but their computar CPU is made
by Jews. Hahahahahaha

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 12 2011, 08:52 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 12 2011, 08:52 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



@randytsx, no point entertaining him. You've done your best to present your points. Better save your energy for better cause. gogo2 is an obvious fanboy who doesn't understand the severity of a failed venture to Nokia at this moment. When he sees the light he will understand.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 08:54 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 08:52 PM)
@randytsx, no point entertaining him. You've done your best to present your points. Better save your energy for better cause. gogo2 is an obvious fanboy who doesn't understand the severity of a failed venture to Nokia at this moment. When he sees the light he will understand.
*
Wow, who are you? How you know the venture is failed? You're some clairvoyant from the future? But unfortunately you're not.
You're just some fanboys butthurt because Nokia dun wan to make phone for lousy OS such as Android. icon_idea.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 12 2011, 08:54 PM
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 12 2011, 08:57 PM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 08:52 PM)
@randytsx, no point entertaining him. You've done your best to present your points. Better save your energy for better cause. gogo2 is an obvious fanboy who doesn't understand the severity of a failed venture to Nokia at this moment. When he sees the light he will understand.
*
While i am a Nokia user as well and i like it, i also think gogo2 is a little bit too 'far" about it.

gogo2,

I also like Nokia as well and reluctant to toss it for any brand yet, but try keep this to yourself. Hardly anyone is appreciating your effort as well. Just spend your time in more meaningful post if you are addicted to LYN like me, especially in the cupid corner or kopitiam. tongue.gif
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 09:03 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Quantum_thinking @ Feb 12 2011, 08:57 PM)
While i am a Nokia user as well and i like it, i also think gogo2 is a little bit too 'far" about it.

gogo2,

  I also like Nokia as well and reluctant to toss it for any brand yet, but try keep this to yourself. Hardly anyone is appreciating your effort as well. Just spend your time in more meaningful post if you are addicted to LYN like me, especially in the cupid corner or kopitiam.  tongue.gif
*
How can it be too far when Nokia is making great hardware couple with great OS like WP7?

I'm posting meaningful post here by tell people why Nokia and Microsoft will win. Else, they won't married if they won't succeed.

I believe those that bash this glory alliance that have problem. They simply can't stomach the fact that Microsoft and Nokia will
be the greatest mobile manufacturer in the future.

As we know, Nokia sure die if they do anything soon. Symbian? haha.. Meego? I believe they know Meego is a problematic OS
for now since its probably not full fledge yet.

If you think people need to appreciate my effort, then you're wrong. They are just fanboys. They are the one who should rethink
why they hate M$ in the first place. Don't be like kid ok. Hatred is not welcome here in phone thread.
randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 09:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 08:48 PM)
Nokia made 100% good phone. So having a good GPS and camera means Nokia is great camera maker and HTC is lousy camera make
which I have said earlier. I just reply a question. I don't mean to say phone is for GPS and camera. Don't put words into my mouth.

I laugh at the matters because I buy phone that is good. Not based on how M$ do their business last time. That's why I'm laughing
at him and now I'm laughing at you now. You guys are like those idiot tat boycott Jews product but their computar CPU is made
by Jews. Hahahahahaha
*
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 08:54 PM)
Wow, who are you? How you know the venture is failed? You're some clairvoyant from the future? But unfortunately you're not.
You're just some fanboys butthurt because Nokia dun wan to make phone for lousy OS such as Android.  icon_idea.gif
*
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:03 PM)
How can it be too far when Nokia is making great hardware couple with great OS like WP7?

I'm posting meaningful post here by tell people why Nokia and Microsoft will win. Else, they won't married if they won't succeed.

I believe those that bash this glory alliance that have problem. They simply can't stomach the fact that Microsoft and Nokia will
be the greatest mobile manufacturer in the future.

As we know, Nokia sure die if they do anything soon. Symbian? haha.. Meego? I believe they know Meego is a problematic OS
for now since its probably not full fledge yet.

If you think people need to appreciate my effort, then you're wrong. They are just fanboys. They are the one who should rethink
why they hate M$ in the first place. Don't be like kid ok. Hatred is not welcome here in phone thread.
*
It's tiresome trying to explain facts to somebody who refuse to understand....First, are you even tech-savvy? Do you even know anything about what you're talking about? How much knowledge of computers and IT that you know? Why don't you go into the Android and Linux world and learn more about them first. No offense, but you're making yourself look more and more dumb and irrelevant with every post here... and also in the other threads that you posted your replies... I think it's best that you stop. If you are urged to reply, Google for more info first, and learn not only about WP7 / iOS or anything that only you are in favour of, but also things that you don't like because of ignorance, like Android, or even Linux.

You look like you're getting paid by Microsoft or Nokia to post here. Well, maybe you're doing this for the money...but if that's the case... ah well... sigh...

SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 09:24 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 09:19 PM)
It's tiresome trying to explain facts to somebody who refuse to understand....First, are you even tech-savvy? Do you even know anything about what you're talking about? How much knowledge of computers and IT that you know? Why don't you go into the Android and Linux world and learn more about them first. No offense, but you're making yourself look more and more dumb and irrelevant with every post here... and also in the other threads that you posted your replies... I think it's best that you stop. If you are urged to reply, Google for more info first, and learn not only about WP7 / iOS or anything that only you are in favour of, but also things that you don't like because of ignorance, like Android, or even Linux.

You look like you're getting paid by Microsoft or Nokia to post here. Well, maybe you're doing this for the money...but if that's the case... ah well... sigh...
*
huh? after u failed in your argument, you said people dunno about IT and computer? haha.. ok la. what ever rock your boat.
also, after lost argument, some of the fanboy will say other is troll la. This la.

also, in your post above, you don't have anything better to say, pls dun reply. You're wasting bandwidth. sweat.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 12 2011, 09:26 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 12 2011, 09:37 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



gogo2, I said the 'severity of a failed venture'. I did not say that the venture is a failed one.

Most of us who voiced our disappointment over Nokia choosing WP7 is because we see the adoption level of WP7 by USERS, which is disappointing to say the least. If this trend continues, the venture will fail to yield, which means Nokia going down.

Yes I butthurt coz Nokia did not choose android, or else Android will have good hardware. But even without Nokia, Android as a whole has been creeping up Nokia's @$$.

We're talking about brand survival here, and Android obviously offers a much better expansion and survival package. HTC will survive w/o WP7, so does Samsung, LG or Dell, because they all have Android.

But Nokia WILL, since they are all into this venture (like gamble 'Sai Lang'. Go watch God of Gamble if you dunno wat it means). If it fails, Nokia will be off the smartphone world. I don't even know what the other possibility is because the chances of Nokia going #1 with WP7 is very very bleak. Stock prices don't stay there constant to wait for the release of Nokia WP7.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 12 2011, 09:41 PM
randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 09:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
If I continue to argue, the thread will get more and more irrelevant. Because you don't understand, and you refuse to understand, I need to go through a very complicated process, but even that doesn't guarantee that you'll learn.

First, I need to Google for links to all the websites that talk about Free & Open Source software, the concept of software freedom, then Linux, itself has many many different distros serving many many purposes, each distro with countless documents, tutorials and guides, before that you need to learn programming and scripting, which, consist of many many different languages, then talk about the various processors a particular Linux distro could run on, then before you could understand everything, you need to learn about mobile processors, then mobile platforms, what a mobile OS should be like, before you come to specific mobile OSes like WP7, iOS and Android.

And that's not all yet. *gasp*

So, you still insist that I continue to debate with you? That's why I told you, go learn before you say anything. Don't talk so much but all are pointless and makes you look like you don't know anything (which is, true?).
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 09:41 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:37 PM)
gogo2, I said the 'severity of a failed venture'. I did not say that the venture is a failed one.

Most of us who voiced our disappointment over Nokia choosing WP7 is because we see the adoption level of WP7 by USERS, which is disappointing to say the least. If this trend continues, the venture will fail to yield, which means Nokia going down.

Yes I butthurt coz Nokia did not choose android, or else Android will have good hardware. But even without Nokia, Android as a whole has been creeping up Nokia's @$$.

We're talking about brand survival here, and Android obviously offers a much better expansion and survival package. HTC will survive w/o WP7, so does Samsung, LG or Dell, because they all have Android.

But Nokia WILL, since they are all into this venture (like gamble 'Sai Lang'. Go watch God of Gamble if you dunno wat it means). If it fails, Nokia will be off the smartphone world. I don't even know the other possibility is because the chances of Nokia going #1 with WP7 is very very bleak.
*
I love your post. Finally you talk straight instead of bashing me left and right. smile.gif icon_rolleyes.gif thumbup.gif

QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 09:39 PM)
If I continue to argue, the thread will get more and more irrelevant. Because you don't understand, and you refuse to understand, I need to go through a very complicated process, but even that doesn't guarantee that you'll learn.

First, I need to Google for links to all the websites that talk about Free & Open Source software, the concept of software freedom, then Linux, itself has many many different distros serving many many purposes, each distro with countless documents, tutorials and guides, before that you need to learn programming and scripting, which, consist of many many different languages, then talk about the various processors a particular Linux distro could run on, then before you could understand everything, you need to learn about mobile processors, then mobile platforms, what a mobile OS should be like, before you come to specific mobile OSes like WP7, iOS and Android.

And that's not all yet. *gasp*

So, you still insist that I continue to debate with you? That's why I told you, go learn before you say anything. Don't talk so much but all are pointless and makes you look like you don't know anything (which is, true?).
*
I'm not sure why we talking about open source now. Are you saying that open source is the best? sweat.gif
DJFoo000
post Feb 12 2011, 09:43 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



^WTH? You only started to read after I posted that? Or I did not make my point about 'brand survival' much more clearer in my previous posts?

I've been talking about brand survival since the start of the discussion. I would appreciate it more if you have understood everything me and randy said in earlier posts.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 12 2011, 09:45 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 09:45 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:43 PM)
^WTH? You only started to read after I posted that? Or I did not make my point about 'brand survival' much more clearer in my previous posts?

I've been talking about brand survival since the start of the discussion. I would appreciate it more if you would've understood everything me and randy said in earlier posts.
*
anyway, I have not reply your post yet. wait ya...

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 12 2011, 09:51 PM
randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 09:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:41 PM)
I'm not sure why we talking about open source now. Are you saying that open source is the best?  sweat.gif
*
Because you're insulting Android without knowing anything. Do you know Android uses a modified Linux kernel? Do you know what's Linux? sweat.gif

PLEASE MOTHERf***ING LEARN ABOUT THINGS THAT YOU DON'T KNOW BEFORE POSTING.

Yes, open source is the best. Do you know what OSes or platforms most websites are hosted on?

EDIT: I feel bad for TS, sorry. gogo2 if you want to continue the debate, open a new thread and we can play there.

This post has been edited by randytsx: Feb 12 2011, 09:53 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 12 2011, 09:55 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 09:45 PM)
Because you're insulting Android without knowing anything. Do you know Android uses a modified Linux kernel? Do you know what's Linux? sweat.gif

PLEASE MOTHERf***ING LEARN ABOUT THINGS THAT YOU DON'T KNOW BEFORE POSTING.

Yes, open source is the best. Do you know what OSes or platforms most websites are hosted on?

EDIT: I feel bad for TS, sorry.  gogo2 if you want to continue the debate, open a new thread and we can play there.
*
how the fffffffffffffuuuuuuuuu i dunno about that... i'm linux user also... waffak..

also oracle suing stuff also i know...

we debate later.. i got something to do.
WhatMan
post Feb 12 2011, 10:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,623 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(hypermount @ Feb 11 2011, 04:13 PM)
Symbian and Meego will stay...they can't afford to alienate current symbian's huge user base of course.

http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/nokia-a...windows-phone-b
*
Well of course it will stay. Even MS won't drop support for Windows XP after Vista and Windows 7.


Getz
post Feb 12 2011, 10:09 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
390 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



Nice argument here, like you guys are Stephen Elop +Steve Ballmer + Steve Jobs that trying to argue on forum in disguise. I don't know lowyat forum made it to America. Nicee
ViRaViRa
post Feb 12 2011, 10:09 PM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(WhatMan @ Feb 12 2011, 10:02 PM)
Well of course it will stay. Even MS won't drop support for Windows XP after Vista and Windows 7.
*
Link was "old news" tongue.gif

Later after that, Nokia has indicated on how will the support be, which is almost no support, especially for Symbian.
randytsx
post Feb 12 2011, 10:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
275 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:55 PM)
how the fffffffffffffuuuuuuuuu i dunno about that... i'm linux user also... waffak..

also oracle suing stuff also i know...

we debate later.. i got something to do.
*
I bet, you supported oracle...but that has nothing to do with Linux....-.-

This post has been edited by randytsx: Feb 12 2011, 10:11 PM
WhatMan
post Feb 12 2011, 10:14 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,623 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Feb 12 2011, 10:09 PM)
Link was "old news" tongue.gif

Later after that, Nokia has indicated on how will the support be, which is almost no support, especially for Symbian.
*
Maybe the recent event will make Symbian programmers step up their game (to save their neck) and actually give us more updates.


Quantum_thinking
post Feb 12 2011, 11:59 PM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(Getz @ Feb 12 2011, 10:09 PM)
Nice argument here, like you guys are Stephen Elop +Steve Ballmer + Steve Jobs that trying to argue on forum in disguise. I don't know lowyat forum made it to America. Nicee
*
sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif

QUOTE(WhatMan @ Feb 12 2011, 10:14 PM)
Maybe the recent event will make Symbian programmers step up their game (to save their neck) and actually give us more updates.
*
For the OS? hmm.gif
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 12:13 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(randytsx @ Feb 12 2011, 10:10 PM)
I bet, you supported oracle...but that has nothing to do with Linux....-.-
*
no la. I no support anyone. Some more, Androidfag are starting to rewriting that part of code already
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 01:26 AM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:55 PM)
how the fffffffffffffuuuuuuuuu i dunno about that... i'm linux user also... waffak..

also oracle suing stuff also i know...

we debate later.. i got something to do.
*
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

gogo2, my advice go learn about the thing you want to bash about first. Experience it first hand IMO.

But still due to the lack of WP7 adoption. it's probably a NoWin (pun intended) for Nokia and Microsoft.


ViRaViRa
post Feb 13 2011, 09:17 AM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



Nokia + WP7 is a good combination. It is a good move. Whether it will succeed or not is another story. I am unable to predict the future.

But I have a simple logic on why Nokia + WP7 is better compared to Nokia + Android.

Scenario : Burger stall (Android) and Pizza outlet (WP7) in town A

There are about 50 burger stalls in town A and no Pizza outlet at all. And if I am Nokia, does it make sense for me to open the 51st burger stall? Well, my burger will taste good because I have my secret recipe (good camera etc). It will definitely sell well but I still share my profit pie with other burger stall.

Although my burger is the best, if I don't open my stall tomorrow, I lose business. My profit pie will be snatched by others. (this refers to regular updates etc)

If I open a Pizza outlet, I will be the 1st person. Well, my pizza will not outsell burgers as burgers are more popular. But hey, I am the only one selling pizza, and there are enough people who likes it (although not as much as burger lovers). I don't need to share my profit pie. I still make money. I will come up with new recipe and will try my level best to promote my pizza so that more people leave burger for pizza.

Tomorrow if I decide to close shop for a day, I don't need to worry of losing my business (this refers to irregular updates etc)

I know that if my pizza business is good, there will be more people who opens pizza outlet. Before that happens, I can either patent it (get exclusivity) and franchise it or; I can let new players to come in because my pizza business is already established. When pizza is mentioned, everyone will remember my outlet.

Now, to those who feels, "why not both burger and pizza at the same time?" I don't have enough resources. I rather concentrate on one thing and do it well rather than stepping in everywhere and be average everywhere.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 09:19 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 13 2011, 01:26 AM)
doh.gif  doh.gif  doh.gif

gogo2, my advice go learn about the thing you want to bash about first. Experience it first hand IMO.

But still due to the lack of WP7 adoption. it's probably a NoWin (pun intended) for Nokia and Microsoft.
*
Learn what? I think you and another guy got problem with Nokia and Microsoft. Lack of WP7 is because
lackaidasical attitude of other manufacturer towards WP7.

Probably you should learn more about iOS and Android before debating with me. Adui.. you guys are weird.
Already lose argument but keep on asking people to learn.

Which part of my comment you dun understand pls ask la. Dun make yourself look like fool.


Added on February 13, 2011, 9:28 am
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 12 2011, 09:37 PM)
gogo2, I said the 'severity of a failed venture'. I did not say that the venture is a failed one.

Most of us who voiced our disappointment over Nokia choosing WP7 is because we see the adoption level of WP7 by USERS, which is disappointing to say the least. If this trend continues, the venture will fail to yield, which means Nokia going down.

Yes I butthurt coz Nokia did not choose android, or else Android will have good hardware. But even without Nokia, Android as a whole has been creeping up Nokia's @$$.

We're talking about brand survival here, and Android obviously offers a much better expansion and survival package. HTC will survive w/o WP7, so does Samsung, LG or Dell, because they all have Android.

But Nokia WILL, since they are all into this venture (like gamble 'Sai Lang'. Go watch God of Gamble if you dunno wat it means). If it fails, Nokia will be off the smartphone world. I don't even know what the other possibility is because the chances of Nokia going #1 with WP7 is very very bleak. Stock prices don't stay there constant to wait for the release of Nokia WP7.
*
Adoption level of user now does not mean that it will be the same when Nokia come out with WP7. The reason WP7 is low because
current handphone manufacture do their best for Android. Nothing much being done for WP7. That's why when Nokia come out with
WP7 device, it'll be so awesome that WP7 uptake will be like iOS.

Severity of failed venture means failed venture la. You already put past tense in it.

Yeah, I know you guys butthurt. But that does not means you have the right to bash the marriage.

Brand survival? If Nokia went for pasar malam OS like Android, there won't be differentiation. It'll become another Android
phone. Nokia brand will not be associated with Android and thus the brand will not survive.

Nokia know that WP7 offer the best survival smile.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 13 2011, 09:28 AM
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 09:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

plan A:nokia+android plan B:nokia+microsoft what about plan C or even plan D?
plan A is definitely not a smart move coz there are plenty of player in the market.plan B,yeah,nokia probably will dominant the pizza(WP7) market but look at 10 devices launched at past few months ago,total 2million sales.its even lower than a single phone powered by symbian 3,N8.
y not plan C?since symbian is very mature OS,why not continue their investment by modifying it to be more user friendly,fix some bugs and it just need a little bit improvement.symbian major problem is UI.their UI is very not user friendly compared to android,iOS and WP7.second problem,default browser,nokia/symbian have noticed the problem of browser and they promise will launch an update on the future for new browser.
look at symbian pros and cons compared to the other OS.(i point out the major factor only)
Pros
1.bluetooth is easiest to use
2.Ovi Maps and Garmin support which is the best gps software
3.plug and play,connect to pc,laptop,other electronic device is easy,fast and no need any software to sync(i feel annoying when i use sgs,iphone)

Cons
1.lousy UI which is not suitable for finger use.very not user friendly
2.internet browser is problematic,old,not user friendly as well.browser crash always happen
3.a lot of bugs waiting to fix..

so now they are adopting WP7 and abandoning symbian 3?such a giant like Nokia never keep their word?updates?besides that,i don't understand y they burning so much money in investing symbian,meego,qt in the past and now they just abandoned it by switching to another platform.it doesn't make sense.

This post has been edited by nicholasbeh: Feb 13 2011, 09:45 AM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 10:04 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 09:41 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

plan A:nokia+android plan B:nokia+microsoft what about plan C or even plan D?
plan A is definitely not a smart move coz there are plenty of player in the market.plan B,yeah,nokia probably will dominant the pizza(WP7) market but look at 10 devices launched at past few months ago,total 2million sales.its even lower than a single phone powered by symbian 3,N8.
y not plan C?since symbian is very mature OS,why not continue their investment by modifying it to be more user friendly,fix some bugs and it just need a little bit improvement.symbian major problem is UI.their UI is very not user friendly compared to android,iOS and WP7.second problem,default browser,nokia/symbian have noticed the problem of browser and they promise will launch an update on the future for new browser.
look at symbian pros and cons compared to the other OS.(i point out the major factor only)
Pros
1.bluetooth is easiest to use
2.Ovi Maps and Garmin support which is the best gps software
3.plug and play,connect to pc,laptop,other electronic device is easy,fast and no need any software to sync(i feel annoying when i use sgs,iphone)

Cons
1.lousy UI which is not suitable for finger use.very not user friendly
2.internet browser is problematic,old,not user friendly as well.browser crash always happen
3.a lot of bugs waiting to fix..

so now they are adopting WP7 and abandoning symbian 3?such a giant like Nokia never keep their word?updates?besides that,i don't understand y they burning so much money in investing symbian,meego,qt in the past and now they just abandoned it by switching to another platform.it doesn't make sense.
*
The symbian pro will be adopted in WP7. I guess you never read much eh?

They realise they are wrong to burn money. Now they are going to Microsoft and no need to pay for WP7 and they
get engineering support for free.

WP7 and Nokia will be a great phone. It's gonna be a great combination since Iphone.
piscesguy
post Feb 13 2011, 10:10 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Perhaps Nokia can create phones that can triple boot - Symbian,Android and WP7. icon_idea.gif

I know this is impossible sweat.gif , however I think sales going to be good if able to do so. tongue.gif
biggie
post Feb 13 2011, 10:14 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,291 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i'm saving my money to buy an N8, but i like to wait for the update 1st. When PR 1.1 released i'm quite happy but not that satisfied (i'm expecting a potrait qwerty keyboard) and have start slowly preparing my old phone (omnia i900) for the trade in - wishing that the MWC have some announcement on PR 2.0.

Now this reunion issue coming in, and I'm back to square one. Even my 2nd OS choice WP7 is in doubt as the the adoption of many symbian components (ovi maps etc) will require another major update. Even WP7 itself (without this reunion) already has an update late (copy and paste, exchange issues).

Now I'm seriously looking at android which is not something that I in favour of in the 1st place.

For me a smart phone is very much a tool for me to work on and i want it to be solid and I don't have to think about changing them for at least another 2-3 yrs time.

if anyone can suggest then i be happy to investigate.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 10:29 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(piscesguy @ Feb 13 2011, 10:10 AM)
Perhaps Nokia can create phones that can triple boot - Symbian,Android and WP7.  icon_idea.gif

I know this is impossible  sweat.gif , however I think sales going to be good if able to do so. tongue.gif
*
iPhone actually no need to multiboot also can sell.

Not everyone is techy like us....
stimix
post Feb 13 2011, 10:56 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



+1 thumbup.gif Your write-up damn kheng rclxms.gif
QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Feb 13 2011, 09:17 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
DJFoo000
post Feb 13 2011, 11:28 AM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



@ViRaViRa, you forgot to factor in one condition: you're in desperate need to regain market dominance, and your store has shareholders. You have invested too much in sushi (analog for symbian). While you're still formulating the 'perfect' pizza, your investors are not earning any money (you tell them you will stop selling sushi, and WILL BE SELLING pizza, means you in R&D now, not earning any money).

You tell them your pizza will work, but other stores that sell both burger and pizza give feedback that pizzas are not selling well. Shareholders lari. Left you and the pizza distributor. Pizza distributor might be distributing other products too, so they can survive. But you can't, coz your stall is ALL IN in the pizza business.
cy97
post Feb 13 2011, 11:31 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,140 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
QUOTE(stimix @ Feb 13 2011, 10:56 AM)
+1  thumbup.gif  Your write-up damn kheng  rclxms.gif
*
It is not really a good analogy!

Anyway hope NoWin dun end up like Shakey Pizza! Anyway I hardly eat pizza!
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 13 2011, 11:47 AM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 09:41 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

plan A:nokia+android plan B:nokia+microsoft what about plan C or even plan D?
plan A is definitely not a smart move coz there are plenty of player in the market.plan B,yeah,nokia probably will dominant the pizza(WP7) market but look at 10 devices launched at past few months ago,total 2million sales.its even lower than a single phone powered by symbian 3,N8.
y not plan C?since symbian is very mature OS,why not continue their investment by modifying it to be more user friendly,fix some bugs and it just need a little bit improvement.symbian major problem is UI.their UI is very not user friendly compared to android,iOS and WP7.second problem,default browser,nokia/symbian have noticed the problem of browser and they promise will launch an update on the future for new browser.
look at symbian pros and cons compared to the other OS.(i point out the major factor only)
Pros
1.bluetooth is easiest to use
2.Ovi Maps and Garmin support which is the best gps software
3.plug and play,connect to pc,laptop,other electronic device is easy,fast and no need any software to sync(i feel annoying when i use sgs,iphone)

Cons
1.lousy UI which is not suitable for finger use.very not user friendly
2.internet browser is problematic,old,not user friendly as well.browser crash always happen
3.a lot of bugs waiting to fix..

so now they are adopting WP7 and abandoning symbian 3?such a giant like Nokia never keep their word?updates?besides that,i don't understand y they burning so much money in investing symbian,meego,qt in the past and now they just abandoned it by switching to another platform.it doesn't make sense.
*
+5.

QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:28 AM)
@ViRaViRa, you forgot to factor in one condition: you're in desperate need to regain market dominance, and your store has shareholders. You have invested too much in sushi (analog for symbian). While you're still formulating the 'perfect' pizza, your investors are not earning any money (you tell them you will stop selling sushi, and WILL BE SELLING pizza, means you in R&D now, not earning any money).

You tell them your pizza will work, but other stores that sell both burger and pizza give feedback that pizzas are not selling well. Shareholders lari. Left you and the pizza distributor. Pizza distributor might be distributing other products too, so they can survive. But you can't, coz your stall is ALL IN in the pizza business.
*
+100.

Nokia is taking a huge gamble about this step. New things surely being hammered by critics until they prove that they can bear good fruits, then it will silenced by the success.

I really hope that Microsoft can modify the WP7 radically.
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 11:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 10:04 AM)
The symbian pro will be adopted in WP7. I guess you never read much eh?

They realise they are wrong to burn money. Now they are going to Microsoft and no need to pay for WP7 and they
get engineering support for free.

WP7 and Nokia will be a great phone. It's gonna be a great combination since Iphone.
*
in fact,u never read much.they promise update for all symbian 3 devices including N8,C7,C6-01,E7...now are they keep their words?where is the update?there is no R&D budget for symbian this year,is it possible the update still coming?they keep promise this and that but their promise never come true u know?they promise developer C++,qt platform will be Nokia major ecosystem and it will last for long but now they are switching to Wp7 which is not supporting qt,C++..Rovio Mobile also get angry of Nokia move to WP7 and tons of developer angry as well.
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 12:19 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 09:19 AM)
Learn what? I think you and another guy got problem with Nokia and Microsoft. Lack of WP7 is because
lackaidasical attitude of other manufacturer towards WP7.

Probably you should learn more about iOS and Android before debating with me. Adui.. you guys are weird.
Already lose argument but keep on asking people to learn.

Which part of my comment you dun understand pls ask la. Dun make yourself look like fool.



Added on February 13, 2011, 9:28 am
Adoption level of user now does not mean that it will be the same when Nokia come out with WP7. The reason WP7 is low because
current handphone manufacture do their best for Android. Nothing much being done for WP7. That's why when Nokia come out with
WP7 device, it'll be so awesome that WP7 uptake will be like iOS.

Severity of failed venture means failed venture la. You already put past tense in it.

Yeah, I know you guys butthurt. But that does not means you have the right to bash the marriage.

Brand survival? If Nokia went for pasar malam OS like Android, there won't be differentiation. It'll become another Android
phone. Nokia brand will not be associated with Android and thus the brand will not survive.

Nokia know that WP7 offer the best survival smile.gif
*
sweat.gif
Android i know it personally, iOS, i my dad got 3GS and sis got iPod Touch 4G. So I kinda know how those OS's roll. tongue.gif


I quote myself on this:

QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 13 2011, 02:40 AM)
It's definitely diff, heck better than WinMo 6.5, but they are not marketing the thing good enuf.
Heck, even released the thing half-baked (no copy paste and multitasking).

Unless they innovate, they are as good as dead IMO.
*

Added on February 13, 2011, 12:20 pm
QUOTE(Quantum_thinking @ Feb 13 2011, 11:47 AM)
+5.
+100.

Nokia is taking a huge gamble about this step. New things surely being hammered by critics until they prove that they can bear good fruits, then it will silenced by the success.

I really hope that Microsoft can modify the WP7 radically.
*
Hopefully, or else they are goners.

This post has been edited by 41LY45: Feb 13 2011, 12:25 PM
iipohbee
post Feb 13 2011, 12:21 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Even Americans hate using WinMo phones.
They never gain enough market share over there due to the high call drops and buggy interface.
You don't want to have anything to do with M$soft.

Why bother?

For those hoping to have dual boot, yeah those WP7 phones are good enough to support dual boot and maybe there'll be 3rd party support for it once they're out.


ViRaViRa
post Feb 13 2011, 01:17 PM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 09:41 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

plan A:nokia+android plan B:nokia+microsoft what about plan C or even plan D?
plan A is definitely not a smart move coz there are plenty of player in the market.plan B,yeah,nokia probably will dominant the pizza(WP7) market but look at 10 devices launched at past few months ago,total 2million sales.its even lower than a single phone powered by symbian 3,N8.
y not plan C?since symbian is very mature OS,why not continue their investment by modifying it to be more user friendly,fix some bugs and it just need a little bit improvement.symbian major problem is UI.their UI is very not user friendly compared to android,iOS and WP7.second problem,default browser,nokia/symbian have noticed the problem of browser and they promise will launch an update on the future for new browser.
look at symbian pros and cons compared to the other OS.(i point out the major factor only)
Pros
1.bluetooth is easiest to use
2.Ovi Maps and Garmin support which is the best gps software
3.plug and play,connect to pc,laptop,other electronic device is easy,fast and no need any software to sync(i feel annoying when i use sgs,iphone)

Cons
1.lousy UI which is not suitable for finger use.very not user friendly
2.internet browser is problematic,old,not user friendly as well.browser crash always happen
3.a lot of bugs waiting to fix..

so now they are adopting WP7 and abandoning symbian 3?such a giant like Nokia never keep their word?updates?besides that,i don't understand y they burning so much money in investing symbian,meego,qt in the past and now they just abandoned it by switching to another platform.it doesn't make sense.
*
Plan C is down trending. No business will continue selling something which is not going to sell. No business is going to spend on R&D for something which is not going sell. Things like OVI, plug and play etc will eventually be transferred to WP7. Don't you think so?


Added on February 13, 2011, 1:25 pm
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:28 AM)
@ViRaViRa, you forgot to factor in one condition: you're in desperate need to regain market dominance, and your store has shareholders. You have invested too much in sushi (analog for symbian). While you're still formulating the 'perfect' pizza, your investors are not earning any money (you tell them you will stop selling sushi, and WILL BE SELLING pizza, means you in R&D now, not earning any money).

You tell them your pizza will work, but other stores that sell both burger and pizza give feedback that pizzas are not selling well. Shareholders lari. Left you and the pizza distributor. Pizza distributor might be distributing other products too, so they can survive. But you can't, coz your stall is ALL IN in the pizza business.
*
Pizza is already formulated by Microsoft. Perfection doesn't exist in this business. Recipe is already there, so R&D is minimum. Shareholders will also leave if sushi doesn't do well. The difference is whether now or in next few months.

Other stores concentrate more on burger compared to pizza. People are bored eating the same pizzas in those shops (same old model, all same "recipe"). They don't give feedback that pizzas are NOT SELLING WELL. They are just saying that burgers sell more than pizzas; and they continue selling more burger. Share holders lari or not, it depends on how the pizza sells. Like mentioned above, pizza still sells but just not as many as burgers.


Added on February 13, 2011, 1:29 pm
QUOTE(cy97 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:31 AM)
It is not really a good analogy!

Anyway hope NoWin dun end up like Shakey Pizza! Anyway I hardly eat pizza!
*
Explain why. You don't have a reason to say that Nokia will end up like shakeys pizza unless :
1) you have a good reason which supersedes my reasoning.
2) you can predict future.

p/s : I see that Shakeys pizza is doing good too smile.gif


Added on February 13, 2011, 1:31 pm
QUOTE(Quantum_thinking @ Feb 13 2011, 11:47 AM)
+5.
+100.

Nokia is taking a huge gamble about this step. New things surely being hammered by critics until they prove that they can bear good fruits, then it will silenced by the success.

I really hope that Microsoft can modify the WP7 radically.
*
They have to gamble, for the reasons I've mentioned above in my scenario. Business is all about trying out something new to succeed. It may fail but if it did not? Imagine where will it be then smile.gif

This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Feb 13 2011, 01:44 PM
scoop7
post Feb 13 2011, 02:15 PM

orly? mai pen rai
******
Senior Member
1,154 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Seremban/KL
strategic alliance or strategic microsoft take over?

Nokia USA president is out, replaced by Microsoft vet Chris Weber as Elopocalypse continues
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 02:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
i dont think microsoft will allow nokia modify their os so much to be nokia alike phone..since microsoft so strict to wp7.
shogun_125
post Feb 13 2011, 02:37 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
557 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: PhotoJournalist

pity intel with Meego, which is does'nt go ..
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 02:48 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(shogun_125 @ Feb 13 2011, 02:37 PM)
pity intel with Meego, which is does'nt  go ..
*
AMD also rite? hmm.gif

They also join forces to make MeeGo go iirc.
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 02:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
yes AMD as well.but its too early to conclude everything.lets see tomorrow MWC2011 at Barcelona.
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 03:29 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 02:49 PM)
yes AMD as well.but its too early to conclude everything.lets see tomorrow MWC2011 at Barcelona.
*
True, have to wait for MWC. Hopefully i'll go along just fine.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 03:35 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 02:19 PM)
i dont think microsoft will allow nokia modify their os so much to be nokia alike phone..since microsoft so strict to wp7.
*
You're wrong. Nokia is actually owning half of WP7. And WP7 will include Ovi and Symbian port. So means Nokia can change
anything they want with WP7.

I don't understand why you guys don't understand how big changes WP7 will be made by Nokia. I find it weird.
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 03:45 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 03:35 PM)
You're wrong. Nokia is actually owning half of WP7. And WP7 will include Ovi and Symbian port. So means Nokia can change
anything they want with WP7.

I don't understand why you guys don't understand how big changes WP7 will be made by Nokia. I find it weird.
*
We're just skeptical of the degree of changes that nokia is allowed to make on WP7.

As we all saw on HTC's line of WP7, the did not Sense the thing up. (Like they did with everything else.)

icon_idea.gif

So yeah, that's my concern right there.
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 04:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 03:35 PM)
You're wrong. Nokia is actually owning half of WP7. And WP7 will include Ovi and Symbian port. So means Nokia can change
anything they want with WP7.

I don't understand why you guys don't understand how big changes WP7 will be made by Nokia. I find it weird.
*
ok.final product not yet release and we have no point to argue bout it.
what about their promises to symbian user?such a giant company keep cheating their customer and their promise never come true.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 04:06 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 13 2011, 03:45 PM)
We're just skeptical of the degree of changes that nokia is allowed to make on WP7.

As we all saw on HTC's line of WP7, the did not Sense the thing up. (Like they did with everything else.)

icon_idea.gif

So yeah, that's my concern right there.
*
How can you compare HTC a handphone maker to alliance of Nokia and Microsoft? doh.gif that's so wrong.

U see such announcement between HTC and Microsoft when they come out with WP7? No. Because its just normal deal between software and hardware maker.

This is alliance between Nokia and Microsoft. This is gang up. This is SPPARRTAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Added on February 13, 2011, 4:12 pm
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 04:04 PM)
ok.final product not yet release and we have no point to argue bout it.
what about their promises to symbian user?such a giant company keep cheating their customer and their promise never come true.
*
What to do? After going with Symbian so long and not making an inroad, Nokia need to do something
drastic. You go around ask people what they think of Symbian. Bad impression. N8 symbian might be
good. But unfortunately, it is a dead OS as far as market is concern.

The promise to Symbian developer is during when market still good for Symbian (although both iOS and
Android around). But end of last year until now, the Android gain so much market share that Nokia
need to jump off the burning platform like MeeGo and Symbian.

This is because WP7 is proven OS. Its good OS. Some said better than iOS and defintely better than
Android.

Sometimes, you have to break some promise if you're in dire state. When you're dying, you don't cling
to dying platform. You have to jump. You have to so something drastic.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Feb 13 2011, 04:12 PM
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 04:28 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 04:06 PM)
How can you compare HTC a handphone maker to alliance of Nokia and Microsoft?  doh.gif that's so wrong.

U see such announcement between HTC and Microsoft when they come out with WP7? No. Because its just normal deal between software and hardware maker.

This is alliance between Nokia and Microsoft. This is gang up. This is SPPARRTAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Added on February 13, 2011, 4:12 pm
What to do? After going with Symbian so long and not making an inroad, Nokia need to do something
drastic. You go around ask people what they think of Symbian. Bad impression. N8 symbian might be
good. But unfortunately, it is a dead OS as far as market is concern.

The promise to Symbian developer is during when market still good for Symbian (although both iOS and
Android around). But end of last year until now, the Android gain so much market share that Nokia
need to jump off the burning platform like MeeGo and Symbian.

This is because WP7 is proven OS. Its good OS. Some said better than iOS and defintely better than
Android.

Sometimes, you have to break some promise if you're in dire state. When you're dying, you don't cling
to dying platform. You have to jump. You have to so something drastic.
*
We'll see how that goes. tongue.gif

MeeGo ain't a buring platform mang!!! Symbian is!!! whistling.gif

It's just "slow" as Elop said.

This post has been edited by 41LY45: Feb 13 2011, 04:29 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 13 2011, 04:30 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



@gogo2, lol everything they do now is justifiable to you. Like literally, every action. Even what you call 'androidfags' also got tons of dissatisfaction towards Android and Google, but obviously reasonable ones.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 13 2011, 04:30 PM
nicholasbeh
post Feb 13 2011, 04:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
proven microfag.tongue.gif
RUN!
41LY45
post Feb 13 2011, 04:37 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 04:30 PM)
@gogo2,  lol everything they do now is justifiable to you. Like literally, every action. Even what you call 'androidfags' also got tons of dissatisfaction towards Android and Google, but obviously reasonable ones.
*
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 04:33 PM)
proven microfag.tongue.gif
RUN!
*
ph34r.gif

*ninja out*
SUSgogo2
post Feb 13 2011, 04:45 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 13 2011, 04:28 PM)
We'll see how that goes.  tongue.gif

MeeGo ain't a buring platform mang!!! Symbian is!!!  whistling.gif

It's just "slow" as Elop said.
*
MeeGo haven't come out yet... and iOS and Android keep on grabbing shares... surely MeeGo is part of burning platform...
slow means burning liao...

QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 04:30 PM)
@gogo2,  lol everything they do now is justifiable to you. Like literally, every action. Even what you call 'androidfags' also got tons of dissatisfaction towards Android and Google, but obviously reasonable ones.
*
Of course its justifiable. Its all based on market and timing bro. If Nokia keep on with what they are doing, can die man. Can die.

QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 04:33 PM)
proven microfag.tongue.gif
RUN!
*
Dun run la. I won't eat u all.

QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 13 2011, 04:37 PM)
ph34r.gif

*ninja out*
*
cop out... =.=||
Leo the Lion
post Feb 13 2011, 06:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,358 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Internet World

rest in peace symbian sad.gif
zurggie
post Feb 13 2011, 07:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
299 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Joe Hoe



Although I hate microsoft, maybe its best for the dying Nokia. Most handphone user here in Malaysia didn't know about WP7, android, or iOS. But they do know which is Nokia, Samsung, SE, iPhone or HTC. Nokia still leading in handphone manufacturer, so this is a win for Microsoft to expend their Mobile OS user.

On the other hand... I don't think Google lost anything in this race. Google mission is to get more people connected to the internet and use their service like Search, Youtube, Gmail, Docs, and many more. Nokia+Microsoft help them doing it. So its a big win for Google.

This post has been edited by zurggie: Feb 13 2011, 07:36 PM
WhatMan
post Feb 13 2011, 08:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,623 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 13 2011, 03:35 PM)
You're wrong. Nokia is actually owning half of WP7. And WP7 will include Ovi and Symbian port. So means Nokia can change
anything they want with WP7.

I don't understand why you guys don't understand how big changes WP7 will be made by Nokia. I find it weird.
*
Got proof, bos?


iipohbee
post Feb 13 2011, 09:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Meego is kind of good. I've tried it on my netbook before.

It lacked apps though. So few you can count them with your fingers.Other than that if it picks up with speed, fluidity and had more apps on the same level as Android/iOS it could be a good challenger.

Since when Nokia is owning half of WP7?
It was only Nokia's exclusivity to Symbian with very few other brands using Symbian that made them distinctive.
Going with WP7 doesn't make them this way. LG, HTC, Acer, Dell compete directly with them. In fact there are some other brands such as HTC which makes phone with higher built quality than Nokia when it comes to speaker phone quality, screens & etc.
BBXiong
post Feb 13 2011, 09:53 PM

CFX
*******
Senior Member
6,317 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 13 2011, 02:19 PM)
i dont think microsoft will allow nokia modify their os so much to be nokia alike phone..since microsoft so strict to wp7.
*
WP 7 is strictly metro UI only, they don allow ANY customized UI from manufacturers... why u think HTC's WP7 doesnt have Sens UI in it?
mfitri77
post Feb 13 2011, 10:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Not in the case of Nokia apparently, as Elop has confirmed that the agreement between the two isn't your standard OEM agreement, with technologies going both ways. To be honest too, Microsoft don't really care of Nokia be given leeway to customize the OS, mainly because Nokia has clearly stated that Wp7 is the primary OS, and they won't be dabbling with Android.

From my reading of the releases a few days, Nokia did talk to Google, but there were several things Nokia didn't like.

1. Giving up control - Google allows you to customize everything, but as many have noticed, they want control over the more important bits, like location services (Google Maps, Location Sensing).

2. Opposition from telco companies - right now, it's either android or iOS. They would really like Wp7 to be an alternative (or more of a hammer to make sure Google and Apple understand that they have alternatives and can't be pushed around)

3. Differentiation - Heck, become another faceless android os phone?
DJFoo000
post Feb 13 2011, 11:11 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



Wait. I don't get it. Everyone says variation is a problem in Android. For all I know Android offers the most variation possible to a phone manufacturer. It is WP7 that is faceless. Not one WP7 phone out there is significantly different from the other.

Seriously, someone explain that to me. I genuinely ask for someone to explain how Android is bland and monotonous versus how WP7 is offering more variation possibilities to manufacturers.

Please no fanboy replies. Sensible, reasonable, technical replies are most welcomed.

For all I know, make one good Android and you'll hit gold. Galaxy S selling 10 million units worldwide is a pretty huge statement.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 13 2011, 11:13 PM
ViRaViRa
post Feb 14 2011, 12:00 AM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:11 PM)
Wait. I don't get it. Everyone says variation is a problem in Android. For all I know Android offers the most variation possible to a phone manufacturer. It is WP7 that is faceless. Not one WP7 phone out there is significantly different from the other.

Seriously, someone explain that to me. I genuinely ask for someone to explain how Android is bland and monotonous versus how WP7 is offering more variation possibilities to manufacturers.

Please no fanboy replies. Sensible, reasonable, technical replies are most welcomed.

For all I know, make one good Android and you'll hit gold. Galaxy S selling 10 million units worldwide is a pretty huge statement.
*
Everyone? You sure? Probably you have forgotten the word 'some'....or let's take it as 'most' (to satisfy you). By saying 'everyone' it is obviously a generalisation.

FOR NOW, there is no significant difference between one WP7 phone and another, but HOW MANY WP7 phones are out there for you to compare and conclude?

There is a difference, but it is not significant. I agree, but if you are comparing 15 WP7 phones in total (and mostly from the same maker), you can't expect a significant difference YET. It is still early.

If we take a sample of 15 high end Android phones e.g. from HTC, they too don't have any significant difference (unless you root it, or launcherpro etc). Hardware wise, the difference is NOT SIGNIFICANT.


QUOTE
I genuinely ask for someone to explain how Android is bland and monotonous versus how WP7 is offering more variation possibilities to manufacturers.


I never said anything about it, so I don't have comments. Android is definitely not a dull and monotonous (at least for me).
mfitri77
post Feb 14 2011, 12:06 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:11 PM)
Wait. I don't get it. Everyone says variation is a problem in Android. For all I know Android offers the most variation possible to a phone manufacturer. It is WP7 that is faceless. Not one WP7 phone out there is significantly different from the other.

Seriously, someone explain that to me. I genuinely ask for someone to explain how Android is bland and monotonous versus how WP7 is offering more variation possibilities to manufacturers.

Please no fanboy replies. Sensible, reasonable, technical replies are most welcomed.

For all I know, make one good Android and you'll hit gold. Galaxy S selling 10 million units worldwide is a pretty huge statement.
*
I don't think anyone here is saying Android is bland in monotonous. Well, unless if too much exposure (heck, CSL also now producing android phones) is making a brand monotonous.

Android is a problem because everyone is using it. And differentiation is very important if everyone is using a common platform, you could be lost in a sea of competitors and you could very well end up losing customers, because they have no particular urge to buy your phone, because it is so similar to each other. Motoblur, Timescape, Sense UI? These are the UI customization by Motorola, SE and HTC. They needed to be different to make sure their product stood out.

In the case of WP7, their problem is two fold, mainly because HTC, Samsung and LG, the three comitted to WP7 seems to be producing very boring phone, almost refusing to innovate more that the baseline hardware that Microsoft has specified. In the case of HTC, they shoved WP7 into HD2 and called them HD7, all the while drowning the Wp7 portfolio with successions of Android phones.

And the fact also remains that these three manufacturers were quiet happy to sell the hardware without worrying too much about the software. It's free some more. But the scary part is as long as you use an Android phone, whatever you do with it is being tracked by Google so they can know where, what, who you are. In light of that, free means having your habits go to the internet.

What happens now is because Google said android is free, it gets shoved into every device imaginable, and customized sometimes to its detriment. You now have tons of devices that works using a common platform with all the advantages, and here it is, disadvantages.

Android keeps being a work in progress. Releases after releases that offer incremental updates and improvement. Because of that, compatibility goes out the window, and you have unfortunate ones that are stuck with stale food (aka old versions) that cannot update. If you cannot update, then the marketplace is useless, since now you have to go by platform. This apps works on 1.6, this one 2.1 only. This app works on this device and not that device. Don't believe me? Ask Rovio, the Angry Birds developer who basically admitted that they won't be able to get it working on all android version.

Why do you have so many software developer happy working with Iphone? It's the same as why console games experience is consistent and well executed - the developers know what the capabilities of the target device are, and codes appropriately. Microsoft tried following a mashup of Android and Iphone philosophy by specifying a baseline (a target for all developers to develop apps for) making it easier to develop and test for. That's why, if one were to ask any developers, they would readily admit that the easiest platform to develop for is Wp7.

Why isn't Wp7 gaining traction then? Barring Nokia, no one is actually actively promoting Wp7, or even are promoting it at the same level as their other offering. HTC only has three models, Samsung has what? One? Where's LG?

So, in short..

1. WP7 needed a champion, a company that would only promote Wp7, instead of having affair (or madu) with Android, Bada, etc etc. They got that with Nokia.

2. Android is fragmenting - Simply put, there are too many variations of software and hardware out there that Android Marketplace will never be able to duplicate Apple's App store or Windows Marketplace ability to buy apps and know it definitely will work on your device.

3. That also means you'd have to actually target your coding to spesific device, instead of platform.


nicholasbeh
post Feb 14 2011, 04:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
ok.apart of apps,standardized hardware,software providing better,easier environment for developer,im very much concern about features.compare side by side between WP7,Android and symbian.obviously,wp7,shakehead.gif
practically,i need video call,plug and play OTG(sync with zune,itunes,samsung kies etc is troublesome),gps(obviously symbian owned the crowd,android is not bad)...
wp7 seems like doesnt suit me but it doesnt mean it not suit for the others who concern more in other area.smile.gif

Add on,transfer file via bluetooth is another point which is very important for me.

This post has been edited by nicholasbeh: Feb 14 2011, 04:34 AM
41LY45
post Feb 14 2011, 05:35 AM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 14 2011, 04:31 AM)
ok.apart of apps,standardized hardware,software providing better,easier environment for developer,im very much concern about features.compare side by side between WP7,Android and symbian.obviously,wp7,shakehead.gif
practically,i need video call,plug and play OTG(sync with zune,itunes,samsung kies etc is troublesome),gps(obviously symbian owned the crowd,android is not bad)...
wp7 seems like doesnt suit me but it doesnt mean it not suit for the others who concern more in other area.smile.gif

Add on,transfer file via bluetooth is another point which is very important for me.
*
True that, as a former symbian user, I find that Android cater it's users with the same former functionalities as a Symbian phone does. nod.gif nod.gif
DJFoo000
post Feb 14 2011, 08:55 AM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Feb 14 2011, 12:00 AM)
Everyone? You sure? Probably you have forgotten the word 'some'....or let's take it as 'most' (to satisfy you). By saying 'everyone' it is obviously a generalisation.

FOR NOW, there is no significant difference between one WP7 phone and another, but HOW MANY WP7 phones are out there for you to compare and conclude?

There is a difference, but it is not significant. I agree, but if you are comparing 15 WP7 phones in total (and mostly from the same maker), you can't expect a significant difference YET. It is still early.

If we take a sample of 15 high end Android phones e.g. from HTC, they too don't have any significant difference (unless you root it, or launcherpro etc). Hardware wise, the difference is NOT SIGNIFICANT.
I never said anything about it, so I don't have comments. Android is definitely not a dull and monotonous (at least for me).
*
Regarding your reply. Well there's your problem. While all WP7 phones are considered 'high end' with regards to specs, not all Android phones are 'high end'. My variation meant that a manufacturer can use the same platform for many market segments, and evidently WP7 fails in this department while Android soars. Notice how you only compared 'high end android'? You forgot about lower end.

It's like Lamborghini. They sell only supercars. They are successful coz their product is good. Anyway you do know Lambo by itself cannot survive, right? They are under Audi, and Audi makes what? Yes, cars for different market segments.

Lotus might be a better analogy here, since they were bought by company that only makes non-sports cars.

QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 14 2011, 12:06 AM)
I don't think anyone here is saying Android is bland in monotonous. Well, unless if too much exposure (heck, CSL also now producing android phones) is making a brand monotonous.

Android is a problem because everyone is using it. And differentiation is very important if everyone is using a common platform, you could be lost in a sea of competitors and you could very well end up losing customers, because they have no particular urge to buy your phone, because it is so similar to each other. Motoblur, Timescape, Sense UI? These are the UI customization by Motorola, SE and HTC. They needed to be different to make sure their product stood out.

In the case of WP7, their problem is two fold, mainly because HTC, Samsung and LG, the three comitted to WP7 seems to be producing very boring phone, almost refusing to innovate more that the baseline hardware that Microsoft has specified. In the case of HTC, they shoved WP7 into HD2 and called them HD7, all the while drowning the Wp7 portfolio with successions of Android phones.

And the fact also remains that these three manufacturers were quiet happy to sell the hardware without worrying too much about the software. It's free some more. But the scary part is as long as you use an Android phone, whatever you do with it is being tracked by Google so they can know where, what, who you are. In light of that, free means having your habits go to the internet.

What happens now is because Google said android is free, it gets shoved into every device imaginable, and customized sometimes to its detriment. You now have tons of devices that works using a common platform with all the advantages, and here it is, disadvantages.

Android keeps being a work in progress. Releases after releases that offer incremental updates and improvement. Because of that, compatibility goes out the window, and you have unfortunate ones that are stuck with stale food (aka old versions) that cannot update. If you cannot update, then the marketplace is useless, since now you have to go by platform. This apps works on 1.6, this one 2.1 only. This app works on this device and not that device. Don't believe me? Ask Rovio, the Angry Birds developer who basically admitted that they won't be able to get it working on all android version.

Why do you have so many software developer happy working with Iphone? It's the same as why console games experience is consistent and well executed - the developers know what the capabilities of the target device are, and codes appropriately. Microsoft tried following a mashup of Android and Iphone philosophy by specifying a baseline (a target for all developers to develop apps for) making it easier to develop and test for. That's why, if one were to ask any developers, they would readily admit that the easiest platform to develop for is Wp7.

Why isn't Wp7 gaining traction then? Barring Nokia, no one is actually actively promoting Wp7, or even are promoting it at the same level as their other offering. HTC only has three models, Samsung has what? One? Where's LG?

So, in short..

1. WP7 needed a champion, a company that would only promote Wp7, instead of having affair (or madu) with Android, Bada, etc etc. They got that with Nokia.

2. Android is fragmenting - Simply put, there are too many variations of software and hardware out there that Android Marketplace will never be able to duplicate Apple's App store or Windows Marketplace ability to buy apps and know it definitely will work on your device.

3. That also means you'd have to actually target your coding to spesific device, instead of platform.
*
lol seriously long replies weih. To make myself clear, 'variation' by you two means 'the maximum amount of variation of android devices possible has been achieved, so it'll be harder to innovate', am I right?

State your definition of 'faceless' please.

So, all of a sudden having different custom UIs is not 'variable' enough?

Before this, somebody said manufacturers slow down production of Android to make WP7, so it's gonna be awesome. Now another person is saying these manufacturers are not committed enough, so it's gonna take time. What?

You do realise HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?

And you can choose to sync your data with Google or not in Androids. LOLLLLL got use the phone before?

Sry all I'm rushing for class. I apologise if my replies sound half-baked, coz they are. Hope I made my point.
SUSMatrix
post Feb 14 2011, 09:33 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 13 2011, 10:31 PM)
Not in the case of Nokia apparently, as Elop has confirmed that the agreement between the two isn't your standard OEM agreement, with technologies going both ways. To be honest too, Microsoft don't really care of Nokia be given leeway to customize the OS, mainly because Nokia has clearly stated that Wp7 is the primary OS, and they won't be dabbling with Android.

From my reading of the releases a few days, Nokia did talk to Google, but there were several things Nokia didn't like.

1. Giving up control - Google allows you to customize everything, but as many have noticed, they want control over the more important bits, like location services (Google Maps, Location Sensing).

2. Opposition from telco companies - right now, it's either android or iOS. They would really like Wp7 to be an alternative (or more of a hammer to make sure Google and Apple understand that they have alternatives and can't be pushed around)

3. Differentiation - Heck, become another faceless android os phone?
*
doh.gif You know what you are talking or not? Android is totally customizable....it is the WP7 that looks like clone coming out from the same Shenzen factories!!! But i can understand why Nokia don't want to go with Android....Google has control of whole eco system....they control browser, maps service, location service, satellite service, and everything else you can think of.....in short they control the internet.

MS on the other hand does not have a dominating ecosystem like Google, they only control the OS....their search engine and other services is not up to mark yet and Nokia already have invested lots in a pretty mature OVI maps.


Added on February 14, 2011, 9:41 am
QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 14 2011, 08:55 AM)
Regarding your reply. Well there's your problem. While all WP7 phones are considered 'high end' with regards to specs, not all Android phones are 'high end'. My variation meant that a manufacturer can use the same platform for many market segments, and evidently WP7 fails in this department while Android soars. Notice how you only compared 'high end android'? You forgot about lower end.

It's like Lamborghini. They sell only supercars. They are successful coz their product is good. Anyway you do know Lambo by itself cannot survive, right? They are under Audi, and Audi makes what? Yes, cars for different market segments.

*
Yep, another point which why Android will dominate the market. Do not look down on the low-end market...it is the low-end market that makes Nokia still the No. 1 handphone seller in the world today...while their high-end and mid-end have all been busted by Apple and Android....their emerging market in third world countries that continues to give them the cash. But soon, this will change coz China and India are coming out with cheap hp for these markets...no way Nokia can be cheaper than them.

There are many evidence Android is already do respectively in the mid-end market....and companies in India making cheap Android phones (like the CSL rebadged models). Soon, even the lowest end of the cheap phones will be running on Android with a huge market place with tons of FREE apps, which will attract the low-end market even more. Who cares if half of these apps are crap. As long as it's free, it'll be a strong attractions for emerging markets.


This post has been edited by Matrix: Feb 14 2011, 09:41 AM
nicholasbeh
post Feb 14 2011, 10:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
@Matrix
Nokia is top sales in low and mid end segment.
SUSMatrix
post Feb 14 2011, 10:27 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 14 2011, 10:14 AM)
@Matrix
Nokia is top sales in low and mid end segment.
*
Yes, that what i said isn't it? But not for long. Even their CEO has already admit that in the burning platform internal memo. China/India will grab this market from them very soon.

This post has been edited by Matrix: Feb 14 2011, 10:29 AM
scoop7
post Feb 14 2011, 10:50 AM

orly? mai pen rai
******
Senior Member
1,154 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Seremban/KL

$$ is why Nokia choose WP7 as major reason not controls

Windows Phone 7 Deal Could Net Nokia "Billions"
ViRaViRa
post Feb 14 2011, 11:17 AM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 14 2011, 08:55 AM)
Regarding your reply. Well there's your problem. While all WP7 phones are considered 'high end' with regards to specs, not all Android phones are 'high end'. My variation meant that a manufacturer can use the same platform for many market segments, and evidently WP7 fails in this department while Android soars. Notice how you only compared 'high end android'? You forgot about lower end.

It's like Lamborghini. They sell only supercars. They are successful coz their product is good. Anyway you do know Lambo by itself cannot survive, right? They are under Audi, and Audi makes what? Yes, cars for different market segments.

Lotus might be a better analogy here, since they were bought by company that only makes non-sports cars.

*
The reason for me to compare such way is because the 1st 15 Android phones were neither cheap. They were high end phones too. The lower end phones just came into the market.

Even most of the low end Android phones in the market today are crappy ones which can't fully make use of the OS (mainly due to screen resolution). Android has its minimum requirement too e.g. a min screen resolution but they don't implement a restriction which I don't understand why. Are they going for quantity and not quality? Looks like it.

Most of the low end Android phones that I've used were nightmares after switching from some decent Android models. Even now, the cheapest Android phone with decent screen resolution will be the HTC Aria which is nearly RM1500.

I believe WP7 @ Microsoft don't want to sacrifice the quality for the sake of quantity and that is why they have restriction (and that MAY change too in the near future).

Even if Nokia comes up with low end WP7 phones, it will cause another problem as they will kill their own lower end S30/S40 models. Those OS are less buggy / stable compared to Symbian and having a good sale worldwide too.

QUOTE
You do realise HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?


Time frame from the launch of Desire HD and HTC HD7 was less than a month. Was that way toooooo long for you? And I don't see anyone actively promoting HTC Desire HD either.

This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Feb 14 2011, 11:38 AM
DJFoo000
post Feb 14 2011, 12:56 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



^that's the point. Because more promo was done for HD7. Now someone said HTC was to be faulted for the lack of promotion of WP7. Isn't that contradictory?

And since when ppl started expecting awesomeness from low end phones? You pay what you get (dun talk about 2nd hand and old models). You pay kancil price, you get kancil. You pay Gallardo price, you get Gallardo. But the point made by Android is variation. They can make both Kancil and Gallardo.

WP7, in terms of specs can only make Gallardo. Now someone said Nokia leads in the Kancil segment. Adopting a platform that will limit resources to your lead selling sector, isn't that, for the lack of another word, stupid?

And to reiterate a point, not everyone wants a Gallardo, though however attractive that idea might be.
SUSgogo2
post Feb 14 2011, 01:05 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(iipohbee @ Feb 13 2011, 09:48 PM)
Meego is kind of good. I've tried it on my netbook before.

It lacked apps though. So few you can count them with your fingers.Other than that if it picks up with speed, fluidity and had more apps on the same level as Android/iOS it could be a good challenger.

Since when Nokia is owning half of WP7?
It was only Nokia's exclusivity to Symbian with very few other brands using Symbian that made them distinctive.
Going with WP7 doesn't make them this way. LG, HTC, Acer, Dell compete directly with them. In fact there are some other brands such as HTC which makes phone with higher built quality than Nokia when it comes to speaker phone quality, screens & etc.
*
Nokia owning half of the WP7 in the agreement. OMG, if you never read stuff, pls dun post here lah.

QUOTE(BBXiong @ Feb 13 2011, 09:53 PM)
WP 7 is strictly metro UI only, they don allow ANY customized UI from manufacturers... why u think HTC's WP7 doesnt have Sens UI in it?
*
yeah, but Nokia can do anything they want yo

QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 13 2011, 10:31 PM)
Not in the case of Nokia apparently, as Elop has confirmed that the agreement between the two isn't your standard OEM agreement, with technologies going both ways. To be honest too, Microsoft don't really care of Nokia be given leeway to customize the OS, mainly because Nokia has clearly stated that Wp7 is the primary OS, and they won't be dabbling with Android.

From my reading of the releases a few days, Nokia did talk to Google, but there were several things Nokia didn't like.

1. Giving up control - Google allows you to customize everything, but as many have noticed, they want control over the more important bits, like location services (Google Maps, Location Sensing).

2. Opposition from telco companies - right now, it's either android or iOS. They would really like Wp7 to be an alternative (or more of a hammer to make sure Google and Apple understand that they have alternatives and can't be pushed around)

3. Differentiation - Heck, become another faceless android os phone?
*
yeah, only you is clear minded on this. The other are clouded with hatred for Microsoft. They think its cool to hate Microsoft.

QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 13 2011, 11:11 PM)
Wait. I don't get it. Everyone says variation is a problem in Android. For all I know Android offers the most variation possible to a phone manufacturer. It is WP7 that is faceless. Not one WP7 phone out there is significantly different from the other.

Seriously, someone explain that to me. I genuinely ask for someone to explain how Android is bland and monotonous versus how WP7 is offering more variation possibilities to manufacturers.

Please no fanboy replies. Sensible, reasonable, technical replies are most welcomed.

For all I know, make one good Android and you'll hit gold. Galaxy S selling 10 million units worldwide is a pretty huge statement.
*
What you talking about? Mostly replies are sensible. But because you're fanboy, you can't take different idea from what you can brain.

QUOTE(41LY45 @ Feb 14 2011, 05:35 AM)
True that, as a former symbian user, I find that Android cater it's users with the same former functionalities as a Symbian phone does. nod.gif  nod.gif
*
That's so wrong. After Nokia come out with WP7, you'll realise it looks like Symbian because it has Ovi maps and other feature from Symbian OS.

QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 14 2011, 08:55 AM)
You do realise HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?

And you can choose to sync your data with Google or not in Androids. LOLLLLL got use the phone before?

Sry all I'm rushing for class. I apologise if my replies sound half-baked, coz they are. Hope I made my point.
*
because HTC and other manufacturer busy promoting android... so Microsoft angry and give all to Nokia.

QUOTE(Matrix @ Feb 14 2011, 09:33 AM)
doh.gif You know what you are talking or not? Android is totally customizable....it is the WP7 that looks like clone coming out from the same Shenzen factories!!! But i can understand why Nokia don't want to go with Android....Google has control of whole eco system....they control browser, maps service, location service, satellite service, and everything else you can think of.....in short they control the internet.

MS on the other hand does not have a dominating ecosystem like Google, they only control the OS....their search engine and other services is not up to mark yet and Nokia already have invested lots in a pretty mature OVI maps.


Added on February 14, 2011, 9:41 am

Yep, another point which why Android will dominate the market. Do not look down on the low-end market...it is the low-end market that makes Nokia still the No. 1 handphone seller in the world today...while their high-end and mid-end have all been busted by Apple and Android....their emerging market in third world countries that continues to give them the cash. But soon, this will change coz China and India are coming out with cheap hp for these markets...no way Nokia can be cheaper than them.

There are many evidence Android is already do respectively in the mid-end market....and companies in India making cheap Android phones (like the CSL rebadged models). Soon, even the lowest end of the cheap phones will be running on Android with a huge market place with tons of FREE apps, which will attract the low-end market even more. Who cares if half of these apps are crap. As long as it's free, it'll be a strong attractions for emerging markets.
*
That's so wrong. Android is clone from Senzhen la. You go see around. Those China phone are using Android. Its proven that Android
is pasar malam OS clone...I no support piracy...



DJFoo000
post Feb 14 2011, 01:56 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



^lol it's as if you've seen a working Nokia WP7. You and your high hopes on this 'awesome' Nokia WP7 amuses me.

Wouldn't it be shameful if a ShenZhen small company can make more money from Android fake phone than Nokia can from ori WP7 phones?

Oh yeah, I forgot. You know nothing about neither Android nor WP7.
TShypermount
post Feb 14 2011, 01:56 PM

Patriot!
******
Senior Member
1,636 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



This really sums up what I think.

Nokia needs plastic surgery not a brain transplant

A real leader would seek to fix the problems. Symbian isn't a bad operating system, it just needs a makeover. Definitely the user interface is dated, but the performance is there. The core is solid. Nokia's software and Ovi services platforms do desperately need cosmetic surgery. Instead, Elop proposes a brain transplant, by swapping out Symbian (and Meego) and Ovi for Windows Phone and Live services (except for maps). A brain transplant will kill the patient.

http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/...lant/1297657921
41LY45
post Feb 14 2011, 02:12 PM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 14 2011, 01:05 PM)

That's so wrong. After Nokia come out with WP7, you'll realise it looks like Symbian because it has Ovi maps and other feature from Symbian OS.

*
Hot sauce pls? tongue.gif
What you say cannot be confirmed w/o valid sources.

Anyway, they already too slowpoke. Many already jump ship (me included). tongue.gif
I don't want something to look like a Symbian, i want the features in a better UI with less performance issues.

Thus, i picked Android. whistling.gif

techmostwanted
post Feb 14 2011, 03:35 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
515 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 14 2011, 12:06 AM)
Android keeps being a work in progress. Releases after releases that offer incremental updates and improvement. Because of that, compatibility goes out the window, and you have unfortunate ones that are stuck with stale food (aka old versions) that cannot update. If you cannot update, then the marketplace is useless, since now you have to go by platform. This apps works on 1.6, this one 2.1 only. This app works on this device and not that device. Don't believe me? Ask Rovio, the Angry Birds developer who basically admitted that they won't be able to get it working on all android version.


*
Care to clarify more? If android keep giving compatibility problems, there wont be people buying new devices and let a lone more developers embracing Android SDK for the past 365days.

This is what Rovio said here : http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/angry-...blems-20101119/
-"With our latest update, we worked hard to bring Angry Birds to even more Android devices. Despite our efforts, we were unsuccessful in delivering optimal performance."
-The 17 now-unsupported devices, as well as a general exclaimer regarding custom ROMs and Android 1.5 owners will be unable to use the current official version of Angry Birds.
-Rovio made changes to their game that increased the required resources to an unnecessary level
-this has nothing at all to do with fragmentation, but rather a mistake on Rovio’s part that is being corrected in the form of a lightweight version

You are giving twisted facts.


QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 14 2011, 12:06 AM)
This apps works on 1.6, this one 2.1 only

*
Oic... got any apps which works like that where only 2.1 able to run but 2.2 , 2.3 and all newer iteration will crash?

By the way, if there are apps which works on 2.1 but wont be working on 1.6, i dont think developers even give a damn to this issue. versions older than 2.1 is way lesser and users who still using 1.6 or 1.5 might be those 2years+ budget phone users which i dont think they give a damn much on apps that extend.


Please stop posting twisted facts, this is the last thing we need in tech forum. Steve Jobs made twisted facts on Android to divert buyers away from buying Android phones and he really earns more $ by saying twisted facts, but you didnt. cool2.gif


Added on February 14, 2011, 3:44 pm
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Feb 14 2011, 10:14 AM)
@Matrix
Nokia is top sales in low and mid end segment.
*
Thats true if they just polish up Symbian and continue to use it for low and mid end market. But we all know what will happen once Nokia kick Symbian out from their face. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by techmostwanted: Feb 14 2011, 03:44 PM
Andrew Lim
post Feb 14 2011, 03:58 PM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


Wow. So many strong opinions. Some well-worded and some just 1-sentence trolling.

I suggest just wait and see what happens. smile.gif
Quantum_thinking
post Feb 14 2011, 04:32 PM

Getting Started with LYN
*******
Senior Member
5,289 posts

Joined: Sep 2010

QUOTE(techmostwanted @ Feb 14 2011, 03:35 PM)

Thats true if they just polish up Symbian and continue to use it for low and mid end market. But we all know what will happen once Nokia kick Symbian out from their face.  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif
*
The issue lies with Nokia. Why wanted to dump out so many years of hard work?

Why not do some radical changes to make Symbian more competitive or perhaps change name and edit some of it feature to make it nicer if people are so fascinated with the new names.

It is quite a sad story actually and i really wonder what have those people in Symbian foundation been doing for the past few years.
techmostwanted
post Feb 14 2011, 05:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
515 posts

Joined: May 2009


QUOTE(Quantum_thinking @ Feb 14 2011, 04:32 PM)
The issue lies with Nokia. Why wanted to dump out so many years of hard work?

Why not do some radical changes to make Symbian more competitive or perhaps change name and edit some of it feature to make it nicer if people are so fascinated with the new names. 

It is quite a sad story actually and i really wonder what have those people in Symbian foundation been doing for the past few years.
*
Once Symbian developers and OS developers are out of Nokia, i believe Google is eagerly waiting for them.
nicholasbeh
post Feb 14 2011, 06:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(hypermount @ Feb 14 2011, 01:56 PM)
This really sums up what I think.

Nokia needs plastic surgery not a brain transplant

A real leader would seek to fix the problems. Symbian isn't a bad operating system, it just needs a makeover. Definitely the user interface is dated, but the performance is there. The core is solid. Nokia's software and Ovi services platforms do desperately need cosmetic surgery. Instead, Elop proposes a brain transplant, by swapping out Symbian (and Meego) and Ovi for Windows Phone and Live services (except for maps). A brain transplant will kill the patient.

http://www.betanews.com/joewilcox/article/...lant/1297657921
*
im totally agree from the bottom of my heart.
ViRaViRa
post Feb 14 2011, 09:23 PM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 14 2011, 12:56 PM)
^that's the point. Because more promo was done for HD7. Now someone said HTC was to be faulted for the lack of promotion of WP7. Isn't that contradictory?

And since when ppl started expecting awesomeness from low end phones? You pay what you get (dun talk about 2nd hand and old models). You pay kancil price, you get kancil. You pay Gallardo price, you get Gallardo. But the point made by Android is variation. They can make both Kancil and Gallardo.

WP7, in terms of specs can only make Gallardo. Now someone said Nokia leads in the Kancil segment. Adopting a platform that will limit resources to your lead selling sector, isn't that, for the lack of another word, stupid?

And to reiterate a point, not everyone wants a Gallardo, though however attractive that idea might be.
*
@ DJFoo000. I see that you statements contradict with each other.

Your earlier statement was :
QUOTE
HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?


Your next statement was :
QUOTE
that's the point. Because more promo was done for HD7


Earlier, you are the one who said that HD7 is not being actively promoted. Later, you said that more promo was done for HD7. So whazzup?

You also mentioned the following :

QUOTE
Now someone said HTC was to be faulted for the lack of promotion of WP7. Isn't that contradictory?


So the someone that you said is yourself right? smile.gif So you actually realised that you are contradicting with your very own points.

QUOTE
And since when ppl started expecting awesomeness from low end phones? You pay what you get (dun talk about 2nd hand and old models). You pay kancil price, you get kancil. You pay Gallardo price, you get Gallardo. But the point made by Android is variation. They can make both Kancil and Gallardo.


Well, it is easy to say but unfortunately human nature works this way :-
1) they want Kancil price for Gallardo.
2) they know that they can't buy Gallardo at Kancil price
3) they get settled with Kancil
4) they compare Kancil with Gallardo and then say Kancil sucks

Ok, that was out of topic. Now......Kancil and Gallardo is not the same. Kancil is KANCIL and Gallardo is GALLARDO. Android just doesn't fit into your example.

Let me give an example. Perodua makes Viva Elite EZi and sell for RM45000. It is a full spec Viva.

At the same time Perodua also makes Viva 660 BX which doesn't have air-cond, radio etc. It is being sold for RM25000.

Hey, anyone can do this shit. So what is so special with that? sweat.gif It is not that a company CAN'T do it but it is a matter of whether the company WANTS to do it or not.

QUOTE
WP7, in terms of specs can only make Gallardo. Now someone said Nokia leads in the Kancil segment. Adopting a platform that will limit resources to your lead selling sector, isn't that, for the lack of another word, stupid?


Who is THIS SOMEONE? Also you? Well, I am just curious because that's what happened above.

Anyway, nothing wrong with that statement. Nokia CAN do Gallardo (WP7) and they can also do Kancil (Series 40). Do you know that they can even do bicycle? (Series 20).

Why would Nokia want to take out aircond, radio, music compartment from a Gallardo and sell it at Kancil's price? As mentioned above, they already have Kancil and they don't need to sell their Gallardo at Kancil's price. So............I don't see any stupidity there smile.gif

This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Feb 14 2011, 09:49 PM
DJFoo000
post Feb 14 2011, 10:21 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



A big serious WHAT THE HELL to you. Do you even read the things that you quoted me in the context that I wrote? You left out a lot of bits in the thing that you quoted me. Seriously. Please read back what you quoted me in THE ORIGINAL post that I wrote it in.

The HD7 thing, the ENTIRE sentence was:

QUOTE
You do realise HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?


DO you even know what I said? What I meant? What is the context?

Please no UMNO style rephrasing words here. You want to quote then quote properly.

Shit you Microkia fags should really learn to read, like every word (i respectfully leave out those who do read every word).

Gosh why is it so hard for ppl to just read and reply in an orderly manner? First you ppl came up with contradictory statements, then you misquoted me and said I'm the one who's contradictory. You know in online forums you can't debate without learning how to read.

To answer your part containing kancil and bicycle. Developing S20 and S40 has always been a Nokia proprietary thing. We're talking about smartphones here. S40 and S20 are not smartphone platforms.

And I quote nicholasbeh regarding Nokia being leading seller in low segment phones.

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1750092/+120#

OK maybe I shouldn't bring that quote in in the first place because obviously Nokia's best sellers in that segment are not smartphones in the first place.


I lazy talk to you until you re-read everything I said and fully understand them in the context they are being said in.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 14 2011, 10:40 PM
ViRaViRa
post Feb 14 2011, 10:58 PM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 14 2011, 10:21 PM)
A big serious WHAT THE HELL to you. Do you even read the things that you quoted me in the context that I wrote? You left out a lot of bits in the thing that you quoted me. Seriously. Please read back what you quoted me in THE ORIGINAL post that I wrote it in.

The HD7 thing, the ENTIRE sentence was:
DO you even know what I said? What I meant? What is the context?

Please no UMNO style rephrasing words here. You want to quote then quote properly.

Shit you Microkia fags should really learn to read, like every word (i respectfully leave out those who do read every word).

Gosh why is it so hard for ppl to just read and reply in an orderly manner? First you ppl came up with contradictory statements, then you misquoted me and said I'm the one who's contradictory. You know in online forums you can't debate without learning how to read.

To answer your part containing kancil and bicycle. Developing S20 and S40 has always been a Nokia proprietary thing. We're talking about smartphones here. S40 and S20 are not smartphone platforms.

And I quote nicholasbeh regarding Nokia being leading seller in low segment phones.

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1750092/+120#

OK maybe I shouldn't bring that quote in in the first place because obviously Nokia's best sellers in that segment are not smartphones in the first place.
I lazy talk to you until you re-read everything I said and fully understand them in the context they are being said in.
*
Of course I read. Just because you don't know English (I assume because you deny your own statement now), I can't help much. Probably you can help your self by staying away instead of arguing just for the sake of "jaga muka".

Probably you want to read all YOUR posts again and if you still don't understand what you have said, probably you need a translator smile.gif.

Even now you are not explaining your context and coming up with new things which is nowhere related to phones such as UMNO. I've quoted your statements properly. It is you who don't understand on what are you saying here in the 1st place.

Don't worry. I will not call you a faggot because the word is not enough to describe you. I've SHOWN that you contradict. You are just SAYING that I am contradicting. Those who can't agree with your bullshit are contradicting to you? Come on, get a life.

Alright, S20 and S40 is Nokia proprietary thing and it is not a smartphone which I am not bothered about because I've already explained on why WP7 may not need low end phones at this point of time.

QUOTE
And I quote nicholasbeh regarding Nokia being leading seller in low segment phones.

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/1750092/+120#


Well, I don't remember saying anything AGAINST Nokia being leading seller in low segment phones smile.gif. So why are you mentioning this NOW to me?

QUOTE
lazy talk to you until I (I, me and MYSELF) re-read everything I said and fully understand them in the context they are being said in.


Phrase corrected. Thank you smile.gif

gstoh
post Feb 14 2011, 11:41 PM

INTJ
******
Senior Member
1,282 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: penang
M$ is really returning now
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/live-fr...west&refresh=60

as i said earlier, m$ is being conservative to the design of wp7, it will slowly release useful high-quality features one by one. =)
The update is very promising !
DJFoo000
post Feb 14 2011, 11:44 PM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



FINE. I explain will explain this:

QUOTE
You do realise HTC HD7 was available on the market (ours at least) loong before the Desire HD? What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?


In the English language, this method of presenting a statement is meant to question one's awareness of a situation, which is 'HD7 was available on the market before Desire HD'.

The follow up statement was meant to question one's awareness that WP7 was being actively promoted, by mentioning that 'HD7 was available on the market before Desire HD', implying to one that HD7 was being actively promoted.

At post #133, you said

QUOTE
Time frame from the launch of Desire HD and HTC HD7 was less than a month. Was that way toooooo long for you? And I don't see anyone actively promoting HTC Desire HD either.
Of which I said

QUOTE
^that's the point. Because more promo was done for HD7. Now someone said HTC was to be faulted for the lack of promotion of WP7. Isn't that contradictory?


In post #124, you wrote

QUOTE
There is a difference, but it is not significant. I agree, but if you are comparing 15 WP7 phones in total (and mostly from the same maker), you can't expect a significant difference YET. It is still early


You whining about 'it is still early' implies that you think WP7 was not promoted enough.

Please tell me, at which point did I contradict myself? It is you who twisted my statements.

Gosh I really need to bring myself down to your level to make statements eh?

Anyway, go read gogo2's posts. I might be refering to his posts when I was making my point.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 14 2011, 11:49 PM
ViRaViRa
post Feb 15 2011, 12:14 AM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


QUOTE
In the English language, this method of presenting a statement is meant to question one's awareness of a situation, which is 'HD7 was available on the market before Desire HD'.

The follow up statement was meant to question one's awareness that WP7 was being actively promoted, by mentioning that 'HD7 was available on the market before Desire HD', implying to one that HD7 was being actively promoted.


Erm, who is your English teacher by the way? Which English school ever thought that way TOO LONG is actually JUST before?

QUOTE
What's up with nobody actively promoting WP7?


The quote above did NOT mean the way you are currently explaining, seriously. Is that your fault or mine?


QUOTE
You whining about 'it is still early' implies that you think WP7 was not promoted enough.


Here is where your English fails miserably, AGAIN. I never mention anything about PROMOTION.

YOU SAID that WP7 phones don't have significant difference and I REPLIED with "but if you are comparing 15 WP7 phones in total (and mostly from the same maker), you can't expect a significant difference YET. It is still early."

How the HECK did PROMOTION came into the picture? Brother, you drunk ar? sweat.gif

QUOTE
Please tell me, at which point did I contradict myself? It is you who twisted my statements.


No point telling. You still won't realise because you don't understand English. Otherwise you would have realised by now.

QUOTE
Gosh I really need to bring myself down to your level to make statements eh?


Haha, you are a big joker lar bro. As if now you are a PhD holder from Cambridge University and you have to come "down" to my level doh.gif
tetsu
post Feb 15 2011, 12:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
415 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


lol this thread has fallen way out of topic...

Unfortunately for Android fans, it'll be quite doubtful to see Android on Nokia hardware anytime soon.


SUSgogo2
post Feb 15 2011, 12:24 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Feb 15 2011, 12:14 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Erm, who is your English teacher by the way? Which English school ever thought that way TOO LONG is actually JUST before?
The quote above did NOT mean the way you are currently explaining, seriously. Is that your fault or mine?
Here is where your English fails miserably, AGAIN. I never mention anything about PROMOTION.

YOU SAID that WP7 phones don't have significant difference and I REPLIED with "but if you are comparing 15 WP7 phones in total (and mostly from the same maker), you can't expect a significant difference YET. It is still early."

How the HECK did PROMOTION came into the picture? Brother, you drunk ar?  sweat.gif
No point telling. You still won't realise because you don't understand English. Otherwise you would have realised by now.
Haha, you are a big joker lar bro. As if now you are a PhD holder from Cambridge University and you have to come "down" to my level  doh.gif
*
the problem with this Androidfag is that they think they are good in English, IT, Linux and what shit. But actually they don't know that
we are better than them. And I saw some of their post saying they just finish class. OMG...we're already have >10 years developing
linux product and what's not. And this 2" want to challenge us. What the hell.

QUOTE(tetsu @ Feb 15 2011, 12:20 AM)
lol this thread has fallen way out of topic...

Unfortunately for Android fans, it'll be quite doubtful to see Android on Nokia hardware anytime soon.
*
That's why all the butthurt yo.
41LY45
post Feb 15 2011, 12:39 AM

Flipping out..
******
Senior Member
1,500 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Bintulu, Sarawak


Developed into Flame war ardy doh.gif doh.gif

This post has been edited by 41LY45: Feb 15 2011, 12:40 AM
Andrew Lim
post Feb 15 2011, 02:22 AM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


I stopped reading this thread a few pages ago. Everybody is just speculating about he future and getting their feelings worked up. It's becoming more and more like a 4chan/Kopitiam thread (personal insults, fag this, fag that.).

I suggest everybody just go to this thread and vote for the type of phone you're gonna buy.
nicholasbeh
post Feb 15 2011, 02:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
nokia is top seller in low and mid end segment.in both smartphone and non smartphone.its proven by 38% symbian market share in smartphone.nokia doesnt have any high end smartphone to compete in the high end segment in year 2010.
PS:N8 is mid range only...
btw,discuss peacefully icon_rolleyes.gif dun war.

This post has been edited by nicholasbeh: Feb 15 2011, 02:24 AM
cloud8318
post Feb 15 2011, 02:51 AM

7 stars still not enough lah!!!!
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: a place only selling crap and leftover IT product!

i enjoy reading this thread before flame war start, discuss at peace way better than flaming each other icon_rolleyes.gif
DJFoo000
post Feb 15 2011, 08:38 AM

Really? That's the best reply you can come up with?
*******
Senior Member
3,000 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Puchong, Selangor



lol I give up. You win. MicroKia gonna be a huge success. Yes my english so bad I fail.

Call me whatever you want to call me man.

Remember the android forum welcomes you if the future you predicted did not arrive.

This post has been edited by DJFoo000: Feb 15 2011, 09:22 AM
scoop7
post Feb 15 2011, 10:17 AM

orly? mai pen rai
******
Senior Member
1,154 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: Seremban/KL
i thot i was in kopitiam thread
ViRaViRa
post Feb 15 2011, 11:30 AM

Think GOOD. Live WELL. Be HAPPY.
*******
Senior Member
4,625 posts

Joined: Dec 2005



QUOTE(DJFoo000 @ Feb 15 2011, 08:38 AM)
lol I give up. You win. MicroKia gonna be a huge success. Yes my english so bad I fail.

Call me whatever you want to call me man.

Remember the android forum welcomes you if the future you predicted did not arrive.
*
lol even now you don't understand. When did I ever PREDICTED Nokia+WP7's future? It is you Androidfags who are saying that Nokia will NOT succeed JUST BECAUSE they did not use Android.

When somebody says something good about Nokia + WP7, you Androidfags couldn't accept it and either :
1) start attacking the person or;
2) call the person MicroKia fag and asking for someone else to give a more constructive opinion, which I am sure that you are still not going to accept.

That is when I came in to say why is Nokia + WP7 better than Nokia + Android. Immediately, one bugger said my analogy is wrong and replied that Nokia will not succeed like Shakeys pizza. I asked him the reason and he kept quiet. That is what you call constructive?

Others said my reason was not acceptable but nobody is saying why. All going back to square one, saying that Android is God sent, has the most users, high end and low end, bla bla bla. Was that constructive?

QUOTE
Remember the android forum welcomes you if the future you predicted did not arrive.


I am already very active in Android forum (but I am not an Androidfag). I don't need to be welcomed again. smile.gif

I hope that those who bash Nokia+WP7 stop using your emotions to think. It doesn't work that way. There is something which is called the brain and it does the thinking job much much better than your emotions.

This post has been edited by ViRaViRa: Feb 15 2011, 11:33 AM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 15 2011, 11:43 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(ViRaViRa @ Feb 15 2011, 11:30 AM)
lol even now you don't understand. When did I ever PREDICTED Nokia+WP7's future? It is you Androidfags who are saying that Nokia will NOT succeed JUST BECAUSE they did not use Android.

When somebody says something good about Nokia + WP7, you Androidfags couldn't accept it and either :
1) start attacking the person or;
2) call the person MicroKia fag and asking for someone else to give a more constructive opinion, which I am sure that you are still not going to accept.

That is when I came in to say why is Nokia + WP7 better than Nokia + Android. Immediately, one bugger said my analogy is wrong and replied that Nokia will not succeed like Shakeys pizza. I asked him the reason and he kept quiet. That is what you call constructive?

Others said my reason was not acceptable but nobody is saying why. All going back to square one, saying that Android is God sent, has the most users, high end and low end, bla bla bla. Was that constructive?
I am already very active in Android forum (but I am not an Androidfag). I don't need to be welcomed again. smile.gif

I hope that those who bash Nokia+WP7 stop using your emotions to think. It doesn't work that way. There is something which is called the brain and it does the thinking job much much better than your emotions.
*
I already feel this in the first few post and this makes me feel its my duty to correct what's wrong in this society. Thanks for making it
even clearer.

I hope people don't hate Microsoft anymore. Just because Microsoft old business system is a bully, and some people too cheapo to support closed system like Windows, it does not means that WP7 is bad.


nicholasbeh
post Feb 15 2011, 11:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
peace.stop flaming.
mfitri77
post Feb 15 2011, 12:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,167 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Yes, why all the hurt from Android fans whichever way Nokia goes. The thing that a lot of people missed is the fact that Nokia is doing what Nokia thinks it's best for Nokia. And going android wasn't in their opinion in the best interest of Nokia.

But then again, it's the norm for anyone supporting open source acting like juvenile jerks. I mean, in discussing Nokia, Microsoft, Symbian and WP7, why does the Android contigent need to come here and make noise because Nokia didn't go the Android route. Not just that, hoping the partnership would fail?

Symbian supporters have every right to question the move, because they are the most affected ones concerning this decision. But whatever Nokia chooses doesn't really affect Android as it is right now. Heck, you have HTC, Samsung, LG, a bunch of Chinese OEM, Toshiba, Acer, a bunch of Chinese Tablet OEM, CSL, Spice, a bunch of Indian Operater, Google, etc etc that is producing Android phones. You still want Nokia? Why? So Google can know the exact moment and exact time you pick your nose, and try and sell you a nose picker? What? You didn't know that there's no such thing as free?

Everyone in the open source world hated the fact that Microsoft still rules the OS world, despite all their attempts otherwise. Problem is, they are not coming up with a decent alternative to Windows. They had a chance with all the Vista brouhaha, but they didn't even manage to take advantage of that. Why?

Over sized Ego, and a Self-Serving Ethnocentric view. To them, Nokia not using Android, is an Affront to the Best Operating System for Mobile there is, and should be dealt by putting the other platform down as often and as frequent as they can. Never mind the weaknesses of Android, whoever points that out is a Traitor to the movement.

Take it in that context next time an Android fan comes here and start spouting the Android gospel.

Competition is good.




WhatMan
post Feb 15 2011, 01:26 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,623 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


Why so much want Nokia to go for Android. WP could be a good thing for Nokia.

They made their decision and it is set in stone. No point to whine about not having Android.

This post has been edited by WhatMan: Feb 15 2011, 01:28 PM
SUSgogo2
post Feb 15 2011, 06:10 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 15 2011, 12:11 PM)
Yes, why all the hurt from Android fans whichever way Nokia goes. The thing that a lot of people missed is the fact that Nokia is doing what Nokia thinks it's best for Nokia. And going android wasn't in their opinion in the best interest of Nokia.

But then again, it's the norm for anyone supporting open source acting like juvenile jerks. I mean, in discussing Nokia, Microsoft, Symbian and WP7, why does the Android contigent need to come here and make noise because Nokia didn't go the Android route. Not just that, hoping the partnership would fail?

Symbian supporters have every right to question the move, because they are the most affected ones concerning this decision. But whatever Nokia chooses doesn't really affect Android as it is right now. Heck, you have HTC, Samsung, LG, a bunch of Chinese OEM, Toshiba, Acer, a bunch of Chinese Tablet OEM, CSL, Spice, a bunch of Indian Operater, Google, etc etc that is producing Android phones. You still want Nokia? Why? So Google can know the exact moment and exact time you pick your nose, and try and sell you a nose picker? What? You didn't know that there's no such thing as free?

Everyone in the open source world hated the fact that Microsoft still rules the OS world, despite all their attempts otherwise. Problem is, they are not coming up with a decent alternative to Windows. They had a chance with all the Vista brouhaha, but they didn't even manage to take advantage of that. Why?

Over sized Ego, and a Self-Serving Ethnocentric view. To them, Nokia not using Android, is an Affront to the Best Operating System for Mobile there is, and should be dealt by putting the other platform down as often and as frequent as they can. Never mind the weaknesses of Android, whoever points that out is a Traitor to the movement.

Take it in that context next time an Android fan comes here and start spouting the Android gospel.

Competition is good.
*
You totally hit all the right points regarding open source and hatred towards Microsoft Windows. sweat.gif
Leo the Lion
post Feb 15 2011, 06:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,358 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Internet World

QUOTE(mfitri77 @ Feb 15 2011, 01:11 PM)
Yes, why all the hurt from Android fans whichever way Nokia goes. The thing that a lot of people missed is the fact that Nokia is doing what Nokia thinks it's best for Nokia. And going android wasn't in their opinion in the best interest of Nokia.

But then again, it's the norm for anyone supporting open source acting like juvenile jerks. I mean, in discussing Nokia, Microsoft, Symbian and WP7, why does the Android contigent need to come here and make noise because Nokia didn't go the Android route. Not just that, hoping the partnership would fail?

Symbian supporters have every right to question the move, because they are the most affected ones concerning this decision. But whatever Nokia chooses doesn't really affect Android as it is right now. Heck, you have HTC, Samsung, LG, a bunch of Chinese OEM, Toshiba, Acer, a bunch of Chinese Tablet OEM, CSL, Spice, a bunch of Indian Operater, Google, etc etc that is producing Android phones. You still want Nokia? Why? So Google can know the exact moment and exact time you pick your nose, and try and sell you a nose picker? What? You didn't know that there's no such thing as free?

Everyone in the open source world hated the fact that Microsoft still rules the OS world, despite all their attempts otherwise. Problem is, they are not coming up with a decent alternative to Windows. They had a chance with all the Vista brouhaha, but they didn't even manage to take advantage of that. Why?

Over sized Ego, and a Self-Serving Ethnocentric view. To them, Nokia not using Android, is an Affront to the Best Operating System for Mobile there is, and should be dealt by putting the other platform down as often and as frequent as they can. Never mind the weaknesses of Android, whoever points that out is a Traitor to the movement.

Take it in that context next time an Android fan comes here and start spouting the Android gospel.

Competition is good.
*
Ok, I truely ah-gree with this. Solid point there thumbup.gif

The reason why I agree that Nokia didn't take android OS, is because there are alot OEM, companies from Korea, Japan and bla2 producing android phone (oh gosh, lots of android phone sometimes make me sick). So, instead everyone using android OS (excluding iPhone), we need something different. Let say, I already have Samsung Galaxy S, why do I need another android phone like HTC Desire HD while I can just go for WP7 phone or Symbian phone or BB? I don't like 2 phone with similar OS. Hey, I'm a gadget geeks, I like something NEW. I haven't try WP7 yet but I criticize it for being NOOB, no copy-paste and multitasking, but a while ago, Microsoft (the one people hate most here), say there will be copy-paste and multitasking. It's a good thing, and I think WP7 would improved with the help of Nokia. As you can see, HTC and LG can't deliver good WP7, they only good delivering android phone. So an unseen future aheads for Microsoft-Nokia partnership strategic alliance, we just have to wait and see. biggrin.gif

Competition is good.

Post via SGS biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by Leo the Lion: Feb 15 2011, 06:53 PM
nicholasbeh
post Feb 15 2011, 07:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,518 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
wait and see...nokia didnt ship any wp7 phone yet..dun make any assumption.although wp7 currently STILL lack of many functions which is critical for smartphone user..but updates is coming soon.just wait and see.
Andrew Lim
post Sep 5 2012, 10:36 AM

Just keep on keeping on
*******
Senior Member
2,844 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


Sorry to drag up an old post. But I made a promise over a year ago. And I intend to keep it.
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Feb 12 2011, 12:47 AM)
It depends. Nothing last forever. Last time we also dun think Nokia will fall like this.
Now you dun think Android will die. But believe me. Next year, Nokia WP7 will conquer the
word. That time you'll eat back your own word.

I believe Nokia and MS become eagle while Android is turkey.
*
QUOTE(Andrew Lim @ Feb 12 2011, 11:36 AM)
I'll bookmark this page so that next year I can eat my words.  smile.gif
Or laugh and laugh at your post.  biggrin.gif  thumbup.gif
*
QUOTE(Matrix @ Feb 12 2011, 11:56 AM)
I'll join you to laugh.  thumbup.gif
*
So here goes... AHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA!!! laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

xerox8908
post Sep 5 2012, 11:20 AM

Look at all my stars
*******
Senior Member
2,725 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
hmmm wp7 failed .
Lets see hows 8
miloy2k
post Sep 6 2012, 11:53 AM

[[[[[IMPERIAL ARMY]]]]]
********
All Stars
15,773 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Capital Wasteland



lolwut XD

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0610sec    0.82    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 11:56 AM