QUOTE(andrekua @ Aug 6 2011, 09:37 PM)
I dont know why you keep comparing price. The only thing you can compare is number is it?
The reason why I LOL'ed at Nokia fans because they always complain battery performance for Android phones, in this particular case, a S2, but they did not realized the reason behind it. And as for similarly standard Android, do I need to reiterate what I have view in my N8 review? The only reason why one would still choose them is for the 720P playback and gaming which is not/poorly supported by these lower end Android phone with MSM7227. Other than that, Symbian basically has nothing to compare.
I see that basically you aren't comfortable to compare at sections that Android fails. IF you want TO COMPARE, you should COMPARE ALL ASPECTS including numbers. Otherwise, of course there will be nothing to compare between them, because you are trying to justify the parts where Android fails and boasting at the parts where Android is better.The reason why I LOL'ed at Nokia fans because they always complain battery performance for Android phones, in this particular case, a S2, but they did not realized the reason behind it. And as for similarly standard Android, do I need to reiterate what I have view in my N8 review? The only reason why one would still choose them is for the 720P playback and gaming which is not/poorly supported by these lower end Android phone with MSM7227. Other than that, Symbian basically has nothing to compare.
And what is the point of justifying at parts where Android fails in the 1st place? If it FAILS, then IT FAILS. If it is a DISADVANTAGE, you can't change it the other way round by justifying the disadvantage. By saying that SGS 2's battery life is bad because bla bla bla is not going to convince someone who don't have time or facility to charge their phone every half day. You got it?
Aug 6 2011, 09:53 PM

Quote
0.0276sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled