need suggestion about this 2 lens.
Minolta 50mm f1.7 ?
Sony sam 50mm F1.8 ?
please advice
The Sony Alpha Thread V50!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 06:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
not sure which 1 is the better performance,
need suggestion about this 2 lens. Minolta 50mm f1.7 ? Sony sam 50mm F1.8 ? please advice |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(Codyx @ Feb 16 2011, 08:15 AM) Not sure about Minolta. But Sony 1.8 was known to have more focus performance than canon and nikkor models and better build quality...therefore the minolta is believe is used? better get the new Sony thanks for ur 2 cents btw, 0.1 stops is nothing just my 2 cents QUOTE(ieR @ Feb 16 2011, 09:29 AM) popfish: better, surely the sal50 F1.8. the KM50F1.7 is just 'beneficial or smarter' choice if u ever plan to go FF. but the SAL50F1.8 has more beautiful color and get sharps really quick at F2. but even if u ever wanted to go FF, u probably will upgrade to a SAL50F1.4 anyway when the times come. so just get the 50F1.8. ya, ok , ic, KM 50f1.7 can go ff , i heard km50f1.7 is better sharp colour & build quality is better than SAM 50f1.8ahtiven: TQ QUOTE(kopitiam @ Feb 16 2011, 09:56 AM) not sure, This post has been edited by popfish: Feb 16 2011, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 10:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 10:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(8tvt @ Feb 16 2011, 10:10 AM) not yet purchase(going to be)blur in this 50f1.7 or 50f1.8 ( but can't get both QUOTE(kopitiam @ Feb 16 2011, 10:15 AM) This post has been edited by popfish: Feb 16 2011, 10:34 AM |
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(shootkk @ Feb 16 2011, 10:38 AM) It's quite simple really. If you are planning to go FF pretty soon then the 50mm f1.7 can be a very good budget lens that operates fine on both APS-C and FF bodies. It's built like a tank and thus will last until you have saved enough to replace it. If you're not really aiming for FF then the 50mm f1.8 is the choice as it has newer coatings and better bokeh and fits the APS-C bodies. You'll get warranty too if you buy new. Picture quality is about the same if you're not into pixel peeping or too particular in getting 'Minolta' colours. |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 16 2011, 02:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(ieR @ Feb 16 2011, 11:34 AM) popfish, yea, sadly, owner of 50F1.7 will raise their arms and shield to defend that lens thanks a lot.serious, just get that 50F1.8, the lens has nicer bokeh too. anytime u can sell it without much loses, and buy the 50F1.4 when u really really going to FF. the SAM will make huge diff if u upgrade to A55/66/77 in the future. Added on February 16, 2011, 11:35 amkopitiam, cheap primes are way to go if u cant afford a premium F2.8 zoom... but, hey, wlliam is selling his sigma~ get that and u wont bother with any prime for period of time Hi , i' will go 50 f1.7, since the ppl sell around 300+ ( future i will going to ff), since 50f1.8 cannot go ff. This post has been edited by popfish: Feb 17 2011, 10:22 AM |
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 10:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(kopitiam @ Feb 17 2011, 10:34 AM) if only i have extra $$ , sure will get both f1.8 & f1.7 but different f0.1 is nothing right? QUOTE(zstan @ Feb 17 2011, 10:29 AM) one thing you have to note is, for the 50mm f1.8, there will be at least 90% chance you will getting a mint copy. emm. ok, noted, but 50f1.7 around 300++ is expensive ? that can't be said the same for the minolta 50mm f1.7 though............................ |
|
|
Feb 17 2011, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
Minolta Konica = is legend (test gao gao b4 u go on, since it was a old lens, thanks a lot who comment just now.)
Sigma = not yet try , |
|
|
Feb 18 2011, 05:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Feb 24 2011, 06:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2011, 07:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
234 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(viruz019 @ Feb 28 2011, 01:13 AM) wanna ask..anyone goin to the Sony A Convention? Good day!anyway, wanna buy a zoom lens..was browsing through amazon and got 2 tamron lens..Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD Macro Zoom Lens and Tamron AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom Len which one should i get? Is too far from me |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0462sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:25 PM |