QUOTE(toronzrockkapak @ Jan 31 2011, 10:06 AM)
thanks
Optiplex330 for replying my post..
1.Main purpose is watching the movies/tv channel..home teater also...
For movies, Plasma PQ beats LCD anytime. Also beat LED at far far cheaper price but some people don't agree so you best compare Plasma vs LED PQ yourself.
QUOTE(toronzrockkapak @ Jan 31 2011, 10:06 AM)
3.I think most of the time i'm watching are in the night time....normal room...
For dim to normal room, Plasma works best. For brightly lighted room, LCD/LED works best and that's the reason why in brightly lighted showroom, LCD/LED attracts more customer.
QUOTE(toronzrockkapak @ Jan 31 2011, 10:06 AM)
4.The age range is between 4 yo to 36 y0...
You do not have old people so either can do. For very old people, Plasma is more gentle to aged eyes.
QUOTE(toronzrockkapak @ Jan 31 2011, 10:06 AM)
5.I really need it so bad....my mouth is watering....lol...Currently i'm using normal astro but going to change to b-yond..and if enough money...i will find for hd digital home teater also...
People say Plasma better for normal Astro but I don't know for sure because I have not done side by side comparison myself. For sport with fast moving object, Plasma generally better.
The 2 main drawback of Plasma are:
1. Minor drawback. Cost about maximum 50 sen extra electricity per night viewing.
2. Major drawback. Like you said, it has reflective screen but some LED also have same amount of reflectiveness. LCD has the least but lousy PQ compared to Plasma/LED. Better Plasma model like Panasonic 50V has significantly less reflectiveness but cost more.
Since some people like Oranges and others Apple, you best go check them out yourself. And oh...whatever you do, don't believe the No.1 rubbish perpetuated by people about Plasma are old technology and you will not find spare parts in future. I call them the No.1 idiot.