Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V6, Selamat Hari Raya dan Kemerdekaan ke-54

views
     
corad
post Jan 28 2011, 01:43 PM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(empire23 @ Jan 27 2011, 10:02 PM)
^ Hearing problems are a regular occurrence with regular gunfire. Actually I was looking at Malaysian SF photos and realize that most of them never use hearing protection.

Hearing protection all the time, everytime. Probably best to invest in stuff like communications and protection headsets, which kill 4 birds with one stone. They allow for communications via NC boom mic, increased alertness with ambient sound amplification + reduced sound disorientation, physical head protection and of course hearing protection.
*
science still falls short of being able to differentiate sound. these headsets filter the highest decibel and nothing more, ie: ear muffs that only work with loud noises.

also, head protection only works with small arms fire. No use when up against assault / sniper rifles
corad
post Aug 14 2011, 10:52 PM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(James831 @ Aug 14 2011, 02:52 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I usually embrace all ideas , but this one is definitely worth shooting down ! A "defence writer" who does not even bother to get his facts right ? MAS has received 4 of their new 738 and a further dry lease of 5 b738 (no sky interior) as of August 2011. 2 A330's have been delivered since March (9M-MTA , MTB) not none as the writer stated.

If he can't even be bothered to find out basic and much touted facts (in Khazanah's bulletin, MAS Going Places, NST , The Star, Maybank Finanicals, etc etc ) how dare he even try and estimate the amount it would cost to convert these planes into AWACS ? And what's with taking MH's planes ?? Why not AirAsia's ?

MH does not have too many planes . It's AirAsia with their multi billion dollar order of 200++ A320's that will face this problem as their delivery dates get nearer and nearer. I speculate that Tony bought these planes now ala Ryanair with their B738 order, when he can afford them (or seems to anyway) jamming up the order list and forcing other airlines to lease these planes to them with a good margin.

The MAS BBJ was given to the Federal Gov as a cost saving measure (MAS didn't have to pay and Khazanah got a gigantic tax relief) , and also because no one but our Sultans could have used it anyway. I remember an article where if you are not royalty, you will have to take off your shoes upon entering ... And this plane , DiRaja 1 did not have to go through any modification since it was already a VVIP transport .. so no $$ wasted.

Why does the writer not cite Singapore as an example instead ? They are using 2 converted Fokker 50 for maritime patrols and it seems to be doing them well. But since their maintenance is getting more and more expensive let's not take that route. There are 5 of Berjaya's Q-400 STOL just waiting for buyers, Transmile MD11, B732 and B722 also sitting around Subang doing nothing. If TUDM had really wanted a AWACS badly I'm sure these aircraft would have been worthy for the task.

A more realistic scenario is that TUDM does not actually need an AWACS. What would it do in peacetime anyway ? IMHO they are going the route of drones or aircraft big enough just to monitor a small hotspot, eg: human traffickers (land /sea), pirates, SAR etc. So a Gulfstream would be more than adequate
corad
post Aug 15 2011, 05:03 PM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(verex @ Aug 15 2011, 01:44 AM)
Lets say, the situation at Spratly escalade very very quickly where SEA countries is at the brink of war with PRC...Do you think that if we order that time can dapat in 24 hours ?

another way to think about military procurement, as a kind of insurance. let me give you an anology..

Do you have a car?
If u have a car do you insured it?
why do you insured it ? Are you sure that one day u will need it ?
If u are not sure, the why insured you car as u are just wasting your money for something that you are not sure of..

the same applies to the military forces. No we don't know if the equipment is going to be used or not. But when the time arrive where we need it..We sure want it in our hands
*
An accurate perception but this "insurance" has to be much more tactical than just arming ourselves up. No war in history has ever been won without allies. And this is the route I see M'sia taking. We don't need these big fancy machines now or for the next 30-50 years. I'm not saying we don't need an Airbone Platform, but certainly no need for a full scale AWACS. After all, how many of our fighters are required to be on CAP 24/7 ?? = 0 .

So even if we did have an E3 or M-2075 Phalcon , it would probably be sitting in its hanger waiting for the next photoshoot.

QUOTE(sleep_snore @ Aug 15 2011, 08:28 AM)
u think u can bargain military equipment during wartime?

u think we are in economic position to bargain during war time?
*
Allies. Lots of them smile.gif
corad
post Aug 15 2011, 07:07 PM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(sleep_snore @ Aug 15 2011, 06:57 PM)
allies? name one who are not in deep shit right now?
*
thanks for the one liner. I reckon Singapore is good enough.

Humor me by stating who would gain by launching a full scale assault on us ?
corad
post Sep 24 2011, 09:07 AM

Hard to see, the dark side is.
*******
Senior Member
2,403 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak / United Kingdom

QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Sep 19 2011, 05:29 PM)
Type 26 frigate is probably naval equivalent of the F35 project. where if got many partners, then cost will go down. But UK defence contractors has the habit of production delays..
*
as what others have said before, it is because the requirements of the vessels changes over time. Almost all UK military projects have come in cheaper & faster than any other nations

Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0551sec    0.32    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 05:39 AM