Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Volkswagen 1.4 Twincharger engine maybe cancelled, too complex & expensive to produce

views
     
TSalpha0201
post Jan 17 2011, 11:36 AM, updated 15y ago

¡¡¡llǝ� ǝuoƃ �ou s,�ɐɥ�
*****
Senior Member
911 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Eboladrome


VW twincharger could be axed

user posted image

QUOTE
Volkswagen’s twincharger petrol engine could be on its way out, according to well placed insiders.

The company’s 1.4-litre engine, which mixes turbocharging and supercharging, is said to be too complex and expensive to produce.
Instead, VW engineers now believe that new turbocharging technology can achieve similar results at a much-reduced cost.



The popular twincharger engine, found in numerous VW Group models, won the coveted Engine of the Year award in 2009 and 2010 and was described as “a masterstroke of downsizing technology and a real engineering showcase".


SoS
pedanglaut
post Jan 17 2011, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


Thats mean they will not continue to produce TSI engine anymore? hmm.gif
Lucky if can buy the latest MK6 golf or scirocco equiped with TSI quickly nod.gif
ferio94eg9
post Jan 17 2011, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
love the quote....

“a masterstroke of downsizing technology and a real engineering showcase"

TSalpha0201
post Jan 17 2011, 11:59 AM

¡¡¡llǝ� ǝuoƃ �ou s,�ɐɥ�
*****
Senior Member
911 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Eboladrome


QUOTE(pedanglaut @ Jan 17 2011, 11:51 AM)
Thats mean they will not continue to produce TSI engine anymore? hmm.gif
Lucky if can buy the latest MK6 golf or scirocco equiped with TSI quickly nod.gif
*
They'll keep the TSI acronym as it generally represents forced induction engine. Currently only the 1.4 TSI comes with twincharging.
pedanglaut
post Jan 17 2011, 12:11 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


I suspect this is a marketing strategy...they introduced mind blowing hightech engine for one bacth of their car to obtain brand recognition (award after award) and start downgrading the engine when customer start to put faith on them..so they can earn back their investment on that with more realistic economic scale.. hmm.gif
CooShyRee
post Jan 17 2011, 12:35 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



thats a shame though, i didnt even had a chance 2 sample the twincharge engine til now, n its gonna be phased out..

but then again, considerin its vw, the new turbo is gonna be a masterpiece as well..
stormlcc
post Jan 17 2011, 01:58 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
who needs supercharging when the turbo technology is so advanced nowadays? and why add more weight and complexity with a supercharger when u can make do with just a turbo?

good decision to make this happen!
tiganasfx
post Jan 17 2011, 02:14 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
QUOTE(stormlcc @ Jan 17 2011, 01:58 PM)
who needs supercharging when the turbo technology is so advanced nowadays?  and why add more weight and complexity with a supercharger when u can make do with just a turbo?

good decision to make this happen!
*
Doubt it though. Article never quote any source.... Who is the "well placed insiders". This engine is in almost all their lower end models now.
feelfree
post Jan 17 2011, 02:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
174 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(stormlcc @ Jan 17 2011, 01:58 PM)
who needs supercharging when the turbo technology is so advanced nowadays?  and why add more weight and complexity with a supercharger when u can make do with just a turbo?

good decision to make this happen!
*
The supercharging actually is working at low RPM and we all know that most of the Turbo will not get good result at low RPM or we call it turbo lag, so VW thinking to get good power from low to high rpm, so they mixed the supercharge and turbocharge together, low rpm the supercharge will kick in to give full torque until certain rpm, the supercharge will stop working and turbo charge will then start working until redline.
tishaban
post Jan 17 2011, 02:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,615 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
QUOTE(feelfree @ Jan 17 2011, 02:22 PM)
The supercharging actually is working at low RPM and we all know that most of the Turbo will not get good result at low RPM or we call it turbo lag, so VW thinking to get good power from low to high rpm, so they mixed the supercharge and turbocharge together, low rpm the supercharge will kick in to give full torque until certain rpm, the supercharge will stop working and turbo charge will then start working until redline.
*
There are twin turbos and twin scroll turbos today which has a smaller turbo for low RPM and bigger ones for higher RPM. This can already overcome turbo lag and reduce the complexity of both a supercharger and turbo in the same engine. If the end result ie flat torque curve and lower emissions while reducing complexity can be achieved with one twin scroll turbo charger why make it more complex?

The VW TSI engine is a great engine but technology moves on.

hanifw
post Jan 17 2011, 03:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(tishaban @ Jan 17 2011, 02:56 PM)
There are twin turbos and twin scroll turbos today which has a smaller turbo for low RPM and bigger ones for higher RPM. This can already overcome turbo lag and reduce the complexity of both a supercharger and turbo in the same engine. If the end result ie flat torque curve and lower emissions while reducing complexity can be achieved with one twin scroll turbo charger why make it more complex?

The VW TSI engine is a great engine but technology moves on.
*
Like in VW Polo 1.2 tsi ?
Mavik
post Jan 17 2011, 04:08 PM

Patience is a virtue
Group Icon
Elite
7,826 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



Yes, I totally agree that we should move on with technology! Why complicate things when you can simplify it.
CooShyRee
post Jan 17 2011, 04:25 PM

The mad italian scorpions!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Isle of Man



QUOTE(Mavik @ Jan 17 2011, 04:08 PM)
Yes, I totally agree that we should move on with technology! Why complicate things when you can simplify it.
second that.. i dont think its a marketing gimmick, turbochargers have come a long way in these recent yrs.. n if vw says the new engine will be able 2 achieve similar performance wit juz a turbo, i very much believe em..
hanifw
post Jan 17 2011, 04:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
389 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

This will leads to lower resale value for 1.4 tsi models~
TSalpha0201
post Jan 17 2011, 04:39 PM

¡¡¡llǝ� ǝuoƃ �ou s,�ɐɥ�
*****
Senior Member
911 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Eboladrome


QUOTE(hanifw @ Jan 17 2011, 04:25 PM)
This will leads to lower resale value for 1.4 tsi models~
*
Not so. VW also came out with the single turbo 1.4TSi engine for regular models. It produces 121hp as opposed to 178hp with the twincharger but it's 14kg lighter & water cooled intercooler.
jwrx
post Jan 17 2011, 05:05 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
515 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
i will wait till i see more news on this subject, cos the brand new A1 thats launching soon is using the 1.4 twincharger, so unlikely it will be discontinued anytime soon
phas3r
post Jan 17 2011, 06:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,206 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


saying my car has supercharger and turbocharger is of course cooler than only turbocharger

QUOTE(alpha0201 @ Jan 17 2011, 04:39 PM)
Not so. VW also came out with the single turbo 1.4TSi engine for regular models. It produces 121hp as opposed to 178hp with the twincharger but it's 14kg lighter & water cooled intercooler.
*
the 1.4 turbo produce 122PS 200Nm
1.4twin 160PS 240Nm
the golf in other countries has these 2 engines
but i'm sure VW has no prob to use only turbo and got 160ps 240nm

plus max torque with the turbo arrives at 1700rpm or lower, hence there are no issue of supercharger needing to cover lower revs range
SUSalaskanbunny
post Jan 18 2011, 12:30 AM

Foodie
*******
Senior Member
4,283 posts

Joined: Nov 2009
From: Vietnam

QUOTE(stormlcc @ Jan 17 2011, 01:58 PM)
who needs supercharging when the turbo technology is so advanced nowadays?  and why add more weight and complexity with a supercharger when u can make do with just a turbo?

good decision to make this happen!
*
the reason why that engine uses super is because of the small size... like gti, with 2l the lower rpms is not a prob so the turbo is only needed for higher rpms

QUOTE(feelfree @ Jan 17 2011, 02:22 PM)
The supercharging actually is working at low RPM and we all know that most of the Turbo will not get good result at low RPM or we call it turbo lag, so VW thinking to get good power from low to high rpm, so they mixed the supercharge and turbocharge together, low rpm the supercharge will kick in to give full torque until certain rpm, the supercharge will stop working and turbo charge will then start working until redline.
*
turbo gets good results also lar, if it is made to cater to low rpms... just that if u put a low rpm turbo at the high rpms will run out of juice... usually ppl get high rpm turbos because low end power usually solve with higher cc engine

QUOTE(tishaban @ Jan 17 2011, 02:56 PM)
There are twin turbos and twin scroll turbos today which has a smaller turbo for low RPM and bigger ones for higher RPM. This can already overcome turbo lag and reduce the complexity of both a supercharger and turbo in the same engine. If the end result ie flat torque curve and lower emissions while reducing complexity can be achieved with one twin scroll turbo charger why make it more complex?

The VW TSI engine is a great engine but technology moves on.
*
true, but usually not in small engines.... at least 2 litre and above will benefit from twin turbos... for now twin-charger is still better in the 1.4 block
Yan
post Jan 18 2011, 08:24 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
551 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
the 2.0 GTI is not twin-charged ?
stormlcc
post Jan 18 2011, 05:21 PM

I can't control my G-FORCE addiction!!!
******
Senior Member
1,954 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(feelfree @ Jan 17 2011, 02:22 PM)
The supercharging actually is working at low RPM and we all know that most of the Turbo will not get good result at low RPM or we call it turbo lag, so VW thinking to get good power from low to high rpm, so they mixed the supercharge and turbocharge together, low rpm the supercharge will kick in to give full torque until certain rpm, the supercharge will stop working and turbo charge will then start working until redline.
*
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Jan 18 2011, 12:30 AM)
the reason why that engine uses super is because of the small size... like gti, with 2l the lower rpms is not a prob so the turbo is only needed for higher rpms
turbo gets good results also lar, if it is made to cater to low rpms... just that if u put a low rpm turbo at the high rpms will run out of juice... usually ppl get high rpm turbos because low end power usually solve with higher cc engine
true, but usually not in small engines.... at least 2 litre and above will benefit from twin turbos... for now twin-charger is still better in the 1.4 block
*
current twin scroll turbos can spool up damn fast, u can get at least 50% of the torque at 1500rpm and is used especially for small displacement engines. it's super efficient, lightweight and simple. the supercharger is just not needed anymore (leave this to the big badass large displacements). u guys, go read some articles on the net before giving outdated comments here.

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0201sec    0.70    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 10:28 PM