Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77

views
     
amadzack
post Oct 5 2011, 08:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


i7 2600k 4.4ghz on Hyper TX3 twin fan any idea?
amadzack
post Oct 6 2011, 04:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(FiragaZ @ Oct 6 2011, 11:47 AM)
looks fine, why not cm hyper 212+?
*
coz i already have hyper tx3
but temp scare me

user posted image

i already reseat 3 times
lapping tx3 but still the same..
i have casing sensor and its show me the temp of CPU IHS
does not exceed 50c
so if i wanna to change cooler
which one better cm hyper n620 or cm hyper 212?

amadzack
post Oct 6 2011, 04:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


yep it does not reach 65c without any use of stress tools
amadzack
post Oct 23 2011, 10:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


the lowest voltage i can run with my 2600k 1.296v with 4.5ghz
is it safe to run 24/7?
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2053303

This post has been edited by amadzack: Oct 23 2011, 10:58 PM
amadzack
post Oct 23 2011, 11:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


nomal usage 50c+
70c+ when 100%usage ><

amadzack
post Oct 24 2011, 09:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Oct 23 2011, 11:49 PM)
quite fine for such frequency & vCore.  nod.gif
as for me i would start to worry when the temp goes up to 90C.
avoid stressing the 2600K 5GHz HT @ 1.54v + as this might cause chip degradation.
*
ok thx for the note bro^_^
amadzack
post Oct 24 2011, 01:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Oct 24 2011, 10:54 AM)
I believe that's according to Intel's limit.!
If ppl follow this spec then better dont OC it. But thete must be a reason why Intel releases K series. If not for OC then what is it for?

Like mentioned earlier, degradation MIGHT only occur if u stress the CPU at 5GHz + HT at 1.54v+ for long hour so if u didnt play at this condition i dont see why u should worry.
*
i agreed with you bro..
as i know the difference between 2600 and 2600k
K siries multiplier unlock..
why release unlock siries if not for oc rclxub.gif



amadzack
post Oct 25 2011, 10:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(Dennos @ Oct 24 2011, 03:46 PM)
its for OC, but is limited becoz of 'heat' rclxms.gif
*
haha that the problem..
for me 4.5ghz more than enough.. biggrin.gif

amadzack
post Dec 16 2011, 01:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


anyone try to cool the 2600k with peltier plate?
i saw on youtube 5ghz running prime 45c

This post has been edited by amadzack: Dec 16 2011, 01:29 AM
amadzack
post Dec 18 2011, 05:50 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


what is the max multiplier for 2600k chip
is it diffrence on each chip?
coz i saw ppl got up to x63

This post has been edited by amadzack: Dec 18 2011, 03:39 PM
amadzack
post Dec 18 2011, 03:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


thx for the information
63x i saw it on some link dont know if he lies or not hmm.gif
forgot the link..
my poor chip only can do x59
but my brother chip can do x60
but i will not using it happy.gif

This post has been edited by amadzack: Dec 18 2011, 04:00 PM
amadzack
post Dec 18 2011, 04:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


dont want take risk of it rclxub.gif rclxub.gif
amadzack
post Dec 20 2011, 07:21 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


lolz i mean the max multiplier was x59..
haizz...
i just want to ask
is it all chip will have same max multiplier or depend on chip..
that all....
if i can run on the max multiplier (x59)
no need to ask for a photo
I will upload directly sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif

This post has been edited by amadzack: Dec 20 2011, 07:45 AM
amadzack
post Feb 8 2012, 05:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


mine 4.8Ghz with 1.464v-1.472v costa rica chip 3130B268
one step lower than that,i got random treettttttt lolz..
unlucky ><

amadzack
post Feb 8 2012, 11:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


QUOTE(Boldnut @ Feb 8 2012, 08:50 PM)
Strange still quite new to this OC offset mode as I wanna my SB temp to be low while idle.

CPU = i5, 2500K, P67 Sabertooth

OC by using turbo per core

1 Active core multi = 43(4.3GHz)
2 Active cores multi = 41
3 Active cores multi = 39
4 Active cores multi = 38 

everything else Auto,
Internal PLL = Disabled since I low OC only.
Vcore phase control = Optimized
LLC = Regular <-- if I set medium I cannot boot window at all.

CPU Vcore = Offset (-0.015) because while on load I get higher vcore than stock even in 3.8GHz. So it is logical to set offset -negative. But Using offset voltage seems got both side effect, if u go positive or neutral = u get much HIGH vcore on LOAD which is not necessary, then if u go -negative offset the idle voltage go simply too low,

once I set -0.025 b4, my idle vcore go below like 0.888 @ CPU-Z *I was able to play games for whole day, but during my working time which my cpu idle, it crash. So the problem is still the idle side voltage, but if I set neutral/positive offset my vcore during load when much higher than what is needed than manual. Any idea to tighten the auto voltage range? higher on idle, lower on load?

Anyone here got good example of setting for offset OCing?
*
bro why you dont play with turbo voltage.. 0.888v seem too low on idle..
it can be found in CPU Power Management option
here mine with turbo voltage set manually
user posted image



This post has been edited by amadzack: Feb 8 2012, 11:10 PM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0495sec    0.83    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 03:20 AM