Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies My Movies Review Thread V2, Got a movie to review ? post it here !

views
     
shootkk
post Nov 12 2014, 04:45 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


John Wick (2014)

Keanu Reeves. What can I say? He plays a certain type of character rather well and he fits quite snugly into the character of John Wick.

A badass that gives zero f**ks unless you cross him and when you do cross him, you'd wish that you'd never been born. That's John Wick review in one line. This movie plays like a video game. Plenty of bad guys. Plenty of weapons. Plenty of bullets flying around.

Don't have to give your brain a workout to enjoy this one. Just sit back and enjoy the ride. Oh, and don't forget the popcorn. John Wick is a retired hit man and was the best one around it seems. Things are all fine and dandy until someone decides to to steal his car and kill his dog. You DO NOT kill John Wick's dog. Period.

Entertaining but you'll not remember this movie 2 weeks from now.


Rating : 2.5 stars out of 5


P.S. : I'll rate this one better than Interstellar. A least it did not disappoint and bore me and I went into both shows with no research apart from watching the trailers.
shootkk
post Nov 13 2014, 04:15 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Big Hero 6 (2014)

This is another Disney 3D animated offering after Frozen. Says on the billboard and ads that the same team is responsible. Seems like Pixar is leaving its mark on Disney's animation arm.

Big Hero 6 is actually a kid-friendly version of the Avengers. If you've seen the Avengers and The Incredibles, you would have just about seen this movie. It's almost the same but with different set of characters and a very toned down villian and family friendly action scenes. No blood, nobody dies and lots of debris.

The action takes place in a fictional city of San Fransokyo. I must say they did a great job melding San Francisco and Tokyo together for it. The city looks great and has signature looks from both real life cities. They have even melded the cultures from the two cities.

As with any Disney / Pixar offerings, this movie has a lot of heart. Mixing it up with the action is some humour which is done nicely. Nice plot and nice pacing. I think this is as close as Disney can get before someone calls them out for copying anime and/or Japanese tokusatsu.

Great distraction for a couple of hours and great for the whole family with something for the kids and adults alike. Extra bonus is that Big Hero 6 DOES NOT come with an annoying song that kids will want to play over and over again.


Rating : 3 stars out of 5
shootkk
post Dec 5 2014, 07:27 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Transcendence (2014)

Many of you might have missed this movie starring Johnny Depp. I know I missed it at the theaters and caught it only on DVD.

Transcendence is like a horror movie for the internet generation. Those of you that can't peel yourself away from your smartphones or tablets and have social networks firmly entrenched into your daily routine will understand the horror scenario that I am referring to.

The movie is quite decent and entertaining. It does not have much actions and big explosions but it does have some nifty special effects and a fairly good plot. Johnny Depp, playing Will Caster, a brilliant scientist, is good but you won't see any of his flamboyant acts here. He's really understated and does not do much apart from standing there and talking but that's what the role required. Rebecca Hall plays Evelyn, Will's wife and fellow researcher. She also turns in a good performance.

Completing the supporting roles are Paul Bettany, Kate Mara and Morgan Freeman. Apart from Kate Mara who did not give her role the weight it needed, the rest are decent.

The story deals with Will Caster on the verge of a breakthrough in the latest in AI computing. He's about to create a sentient AI supercomputer but an organization known as R.I.F.T (Revolutionary Independence From Technology) is against him and his ideas. They plan to kill Will. This forces Will's hands and he uploads his own consciousness into the computer.


Rating : 2.5 out of 5 stars


Below are my thoughts and comments on the movie. Spoilers abound. You have been warned!

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

shootkk
post Feb 13 2015, 05:20 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Jupiter Ascending (2015)

Starring Mila Kunis and Channing Tatum is the Wachowski siblings' latest effort. I did not deliberately wanted to catch this movie. It was because I had some time to kill waiting for my car to be serviced in the workshop that I decided to give it a try.

Overall I must say that Jupiter Ascending is a decent movie though it barely passed the decent threshold. The action sequences are great. The movie is beautiful to look at and production values are very good. The story however falls short in a few areas. I liked the premise it was based on but I feel that the Wachowskis failed to capitalise on it. The characters were a little on the thin side and many things do not really gel so well. If you just take it as an action sci-fi flick, you're fine.

Would I recommend it? Not really. Would I warn people to stay away? Not really either.

Ratings : 2.5 out of 5 stars

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by shootkk: Feb 13 2015, 05:21 PM
shootkk
post Feb 27 2015, 11:17 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Kingsman : The Secret Service (2015)


After Daniel Craig took over the role of James Bond, the spy movie genre has been missing a suave, witty and gentlemanly agent. Kingsman could be a replacement for that franchise. Let's see now; the agent is British, dresses well, kicks ass and has cool gadgets. Yup. Perfect match.

The movie has a good plot and nice pacing. The actors are fine for their roles and Samuel L. Jackson surprises as a blood fearing megalomaniac villain. What is a little unsettling though is the over-the-top amount of graphic violence depicted in this movie (church scene and the 'fireworks' towards the end). I would not recommend anyone under the age of 16 for this movie. It's not really a surprise seeing that the team behind it was the one responsible for 'Kick Ass' but they could have toned it down. Another note that I find jarring is the liberal use of the 'F' word.

Aren't they supposed to be classy, well mannered agents? Why the need to drop the 'F' bomb so much? Wouldn't it be more classy to show that they more words in their vocabulary to use?

There are some loose ends in the story that I feel were not tied up towards the end and the ending seemed a bit of a stretch. Apart from that, a nice addition to the spy action movie genre.

Rating : 3 stars out of 5
shootkk
post Mar 7 2015, 09:04 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Chappie (2015)

The latest from Neil Blomkamp is Chappie. So far District 9 is the only movie that I thought was above average from Neil and Chappie does not change that opinion, sadly. I had wanted to like Chappie better but the movie just reminds me too much of some other movie. This made it kinda look like a rip off.

The storyline is fine. The acting is so so. Hugh Jackman and Sigourney Weaver are merely going through their paces here. Nothing outstanding. The setting, well, Neil seems to like the slums of South Africa so there's really nothing to shout about.

Just minutes into the movie you will say, "Hey! Isn't this similar to Robocop? And isn't that Moose an ED-209 rip off?" The scouts are like Robocops and the Moose.. you get the idea. Here's a list of other movies that Chappie reminded me a little too much about:

1. Short Circuit
2. Transcendence
3. Avatar (the James Cameron one)

In a nutshell, Chappie is a story that tells you that being human is not the true measure of humanity.


Rating : 2.5 out of 5 stars.




From Vegas to Macau II (2015)

One of this year's CNY flicks. Going by CNY flick's standards, this one is just another face in the crowd. Nothing to shout about. Storyline is like an afterthought. Action scenes; well let's just say there's nothing you haven't seen before. It's more about Chow Yun Fatt playing off Nick Cheung with those comedic dialogue. At least it did not stink like some CNY flicks.


Rating : 2 stars out of 5
shootkk
post Apr 6 2015, 02:56 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Fast and Furious 7 (2015)

I guess any fan of the franchise will not miss this one and anyone who's a little familiar with the series will want to know how this one goes. Yes, I'm talking about Paul Walker and his untimely departure from the series. The good news is that FF7 will draw in the big bucks at the box office. The bad news is that the series will never be the same again if they decide to continue it.

With the above out of the way, let's get into the main topic : how is this movie, really? Well, as the latest entree to the Fast and Furious series, it does not really disappoint. The cars are here. The cast are here... well, mostly. Even those unbelievable stunts from the last movie made it here intact. I dare say that the stunts this time around were even more outrageous. Action packed it is but story's a little thin.

It's obvious that Paul's demise left quite a hole in the story. The movie started with Brain trying to fit into the role of a loving father and husband but finding it hard. He 'misses the bullets' as we were told. However, in the end, Brain apparently did a 360 turn about his decision. It felt kind of contrived but knowing that Paul left us with the film unfinished, it can't be helped.

If you have watched the entire series before this one, then you will find that there are lots of callback to the previous movies. They also tried to tie up all the loose ends and let it end on a high note. The plot is a bit 'out there' but if you are a fan, you'll forgive the plot holes and outrageous, physics defying stunts. You'll sit back and enjoy this 'one last ride' and you may find the last scene a bit emotional. After that I would suggest that you accept that FF7 will be the last of the series and treat any sequels that might come to be a spin off.

For me personally, this one is an OK movie. Not too bad but not too good either. So far, my personal favourite is still Fast and Furious 5. Since I'm a fan, I admit that I have let a lot of grievances slide on this one. Final note : I think it's fair that the let Brain's character retire from the gang at the end. There's no other way to do it and make it seems right IMHO. As with the last scene in the film, this one is for Paul.



Rating of this movie as a fan of the series: 3 out of 5 stars

Rating of this movie taken in general: 2 out of 5 stars
shootkk
post May 11 2015, 01:41 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Avengers : Age of Ultron

Joss Whedon has done it again. He has once again took the Marvel superheroes team Avengers and crafted a good story around it. To borrow a line from the movie itself, "It feels terribly balanced", and I could not have said it better.

The movie starts off some time after the events of Capt. America: The Winter Soldier. SHEILD is officially no more and Tony Stark now houses the team and they are officially known as the Avengers to the world. We are introduced to two new characters in the Maximoff twins, Peter and Wanda. Working for Hydra in the beginning, Wanda who has the ability to manipulate people's thoughts, literally got into the minds of the Avengers. Using her unique ability, she brings forth each of the member's worst fears. This in effect brings about the birth of Ultron, the movie's main antagonist.

Good guys versus bad guy. Typical storyline but what makes Age of Ultron interesting is the details that Whedon injects into each of the heroes that we see on screen. We get to know Clint Barton better instead of Hawkeye, the crack shot with a bow and arrow. He tells the tale of Natasha Romanov before she joins SHIELD. He brings forth Bruce Banner, the man rather than emphasizing on the Hulk. It makes for a very different angle in a movie that is clearly action oriented.

Speaking of action, there are enough action scenes in this one to satisfy any action movie fans. The special effects are top notch but I find that sometimes the actions get too fast. Whedon also has a knack to do away with lengthy exposition in the movie with a few well placed dialogue or shots and plenty of foreshadowing as the movie progresses. This helps in getting the pacing of the movie right. Coming in at 2 hours and 20 minutes, Age of Ultron cannot be labelled a short movie but you don't feel it. That's saying plenty especially when compared to recent over-hyped science fiction flick that can lull you to sleep.

In order to get the full impact of this movie, you will need to have seen all the other Marvel super hero movies namely both the Capt. America movies, all the Iron Man sequels, both Thor movies and to a lesser extent, Guardians of the Galaxy, apart from the first Avengers movie. I would recommend that one at least go through the Capt. America movies and the first Avengers.

Will this Avengers movie win any Oscars? I doubt it but I would highly recommend it and doubly so if you are a fan of Marvel super heroes flicks.

Rating : 3.5 out of 5 stars
shootkk
post Jun 23 2015, 09:15 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Jurassic World (2015)

After more than 2 decades, the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park returns to the big screen. This movie is raking in the profits at the box office but is it really that good? For me it was just a rehash of the original with a little bit of touch ups. Special effects are a bit more spiffy. Scenes look more realistic and we have pleasant looking leads.

It was a fun movie nonetheless but only fun if you are a kid or of you are willing to let the kid inside you out and pretend not to see the ridiculous logic presented in the movie. Worth the admission price but like what Claire said in the movie, every so often you need a new attraction in the park and it gets harder and harder to please the visitors - especially if you keep on rehashing the plot.

Ratings : 2.5 of 5 stars

shootkk
post Jul 7 2015, 12:57 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Terminator : Genisys (2015)


This is a reboot plus. What that means is this movie serves to reboot the franchise to get rid of the bad parts, remind viewers of the better parts in hope that they can get the sequels into production. That about sums up this movie.

Arnold Schwarzenegger reprises his role as the T-800 in Terminator 2 but in this one the timeline is a bit skewed but you'd still be able to follow the story if you pay attention. Basically Genisys takes place after the timeline of the first Terminator and Terminator 2. Terminator 3 and Terminator Slavation never happened. You can put this down to the timestream being changed as the events in Terminator 1 and 2 happens thus altering the original timeline into the timeline that you now see in Genisys.

Terminator : Genisys is a collection of the more memorable parts in Terminator 1 and 2 being remade with a little bit of change to the story. We see Kyle Reese and the original T-101 arrive in LA in 1984. We see the battle between the T-800 with T-1000, we see a gas tanker blowing up, we see the T-1000 being melted and so on.

Story wise it's nothing to shout about. Acting wise, the cast's effort is passable. Special effects wise, it's ok. All in all it's an okay action movie that brings with it a lot of nostalgia for those who have seen the previous movies. Lots and lots of plot holes but when it comes to time travel and whatever paradox that it can cause, what happens in Genisys can still be passable.

Ratings : 2.5 out of 5 stars
shootkk
post Sep 17 2015, 03:44 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Little Big Master [Cantonese] (2015)


It has been a long time since I've seen a good movie coming from Hong Kong. The last one that I watched in the cinemas was From Vegas to Macau 2 around February this year and that was because I had a couple of hours to kill and no other movies to choose from. I am a bit late for this review as the movie is long gone from the theaters but a good movie deserves a review nonetheless.

Little Big Master is based on a true story about a woman who makes it her mission to attempt to save a kindergarten from closing down. Miriam Yeung (looking older and wiser here) plays Madam Lui, a disillusioned principal who quits her job in an elite school due to differences with the adminstrative people. She then chances upon a kindergarten in a remote village in Hong Kong that is about to close down due to lack of students. Only 5 kids are still there. The pay is peanuts and she will be the only teacher/worker there but she accepts the job. Her initial plan is to get them relocated to other schools but life has other plans.

The story is a touching one and the movie is paced perfectly. The cast, including supporting characters, all give wonderful performances that makes it all the more touching. One of the best Hong Kong production to come out so far this year. Honest, poignant and full of heart. If you want a good reason to shed some tears watching a movie, this is one.

Rating : 3 out of 5 stars.
shootkk
post Sep 18 2015, 03:47 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


The Maze Runner : The Scorch Trials (2015)

This is the middle installment of a trilogy. I have not seen the first movie so this may explain my indifference towards the events shown in the movie. I have also not read the book. With that out of the way, let's get on with the review.

Post apocalyptic settings. A group of teenagers or young adults finds themselves in an outpost of sorts after being rescued from the events in the first movie. We soon learn that the bad guys are called WICKED and that the world outside the outpost is hostile. The leader of the outpost, Janson (Aidan Gillen) offers them sanctuary. Things start going south soon as the group, led by Thomas (Dylan O'Brien) finds that they are essentially prisoners and things are not as they seem.

Lots of running-away-from-things-that-wants-to-kill-you scenes are featured in the movie. What is lacking is the progress of the overall story. The audience knows that the boys are trying to stay alive and that WICKED somehow has made them into lab rats. What is unclear though is why they are subjected to these experiments. Also the number of coincidences that works in favor of the protagonist in this movie is way too high, making it hard for a viewer like me to suspend disbelief.

Production values are high. The settings are suitably post apocalyptic and acting from the cast is fine overall but the story seems to drag on without wanting to reveal too much. This makes the movie a bit dull despite the many action sequences. This movie did not make me root for anyone. It did not make me hate the bad guys. It did not make me clamour for the last installment. So like I said : I am indifferent about the whole thing after leaving the cinema.


Ratings : 2.5 stars out of 5
shootkk
post Oct 14 2015, 01:02 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Ex Machina (2015)

This is a sci-fi movie written and directed by Alex Garland (he wrote the screenplays for 28 Days Later, it's sequel 28 Weeks Later and also Dredd). It is a movie without much action. There's lots of dialogue and that's where the meat of the movie is. Ex Machina deals with AI. Nathan (Oscar Isaac) plays an eccentric but genius CEO of a tech company that runs the biggest search engine in the world. Caleb (Domhnall Gleeson) is a programmer in his company that wins a lottery to spend a week with Nathan in his secluded abode. What Caleb does not know is that his task is to actually perform the Turing test on an AI named Ava (Alicia Vikander) that Nathan has created. Is Ava truly self aware or just simulating the responses? As the days pass, it becomes unclear who is actually testing who.

There's not much action but the movie is decently paced and the tension builds up nicely. There's no clear black and white areas in this one. They are all shades of grey and it depends much on the angle you are coming from. The cast, although minimal, does a great job of bringing their respective characters to life. If you are up for something cerebral, this one is worth a watch.

Rating : 3 stars out of 5


shootkk
post Nov 24 2015, 02:55 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Return of The Cuckoo (Sap Yuet Cho Ng Dik Yuet Kwong) (2015)


Do pardon the rather strange title. It happens when they try to put an English title to a Hong Kong movie. It's totally unrelated. The Cantonese title actually says 'the moon on the fifth day of the tenth month'. Anyway, this is a long awaited sequel to a popular Hong Kong TV series of the same name. The original series ran in 2000. Yes, it took 15 years for a follow up but man, I wished that they had not bothered.

The series dealt with the relationship between Man Cho (Julian Cheung Chi Lam) and Kuan Ho (Charmaine Sheh). Man Cho was the adopted son of Aunt Q (Nancy Sit) who is Kuan Ho's actual mother. They lived as brother and sister but later discovered that they loved each other romantically. Of course the idea of them getting together is taboo in Chinese tradition and that's the reason for the whole series. The series ended a little ambiguously and perhaps that's why director Patrick Kong saw it fit to do a follow up. If you have no idea who Patrick Kong is then you are not alone. It seems that he has not really have much success with his films.

Thus the movie picks up where the series left off and things was fine for the first 5 minutes. After that things began to steadily go downhill before finally falling into a chasm from which no rescue is possible. First off the story sucks. Then, there's the problem of the leads. I have no idea why Julian Cheung and Charmaine Sheh agreed to do the movie with a script like that. Julian was still fine as Man Cho. He looks older but could still fit the character quite snugly but the same could not be said of Charmaine. She comes across like a spoiled brat in the beginning of the movie and then turned into somewhat of an uninspired extra for her role of Kwan Ho. She looks way too old for the Kwan Ho that was portrayed in the movie. Perhaps if the scriptwriter had written her as a more matured character, it would have been better.

Taiwanese actress Joe Chen Chiau-En played Kiki, Man Cho's love interest in an attempt to inject more tension but there's little you can do with a script so bad. What happened midway in the movie and the awful ending destroyed all good memories one had for the series. It all feels like one long sick joke.

Be warned. See this only if you are a die hard fan of Julian or Charmaine and disregard everything in the story. Fan of the series should stay clear! One note of consolation though : the theme song 'Chuk Kwan Ho' still sounds great to me and had always been one of my favourites.

Rating : 2 stars out of five.
shootkk
post Dec 21 2015, 07:13 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Star Wars : The Force Awakens (2015)

The movie event of the year as it was advertised. For me it was both a bit disappointing and a bit exciting. Let's get to the good parts first before we go into the spoiler parts.

Good parts:

1. Great special effects.
2. Good action sequence.
3. Hot female lead that we are going to see more of.
4. More dog-fight scenes judging by the Poe character and the way it is going.

Conclusion : This movie is well worth the ticket price.


The not so good parts and of course, spoilers:


The Force Awakens feels more like a reboot than a real continuation of the Star Wars lore. If you are one of the younger viewers and had not really gone around to watching the original Ep. IV, V and VI then this movie should be a good watch. If you are like me, who watched the original way, way, way back in 1977 and grew up with all the lore, then you may find this one a bit disappointing.

It is basically a rehash of Ep. IV plus a bit of Ep. VI. The bad guys are looking for vital info stowed into a droid that's left on a desert planet where it meets the acquaintance of the young protagonist. The bad guys have built a massive super weapon that can blow up entire systems (as opposed to planets) and are hot on the tails of the good guys. The good guys now have to go on the planet/weapon to disable a shield so that a strike force can come in and blow up one vital part of the super weapon that will cause it to self destruct. Familiar? Yes. Too familiar, in fact.

I wished that the writers and the director JJ Abrams, would have taken a riskier path and gave us some new story but too bad they played it safe.

We still had the Jedi vs. Sith overarching theme here. Kylo Ren and his mysterious master, the Supreme Leader Snoke (really? Snoke? You cannot come up with a better name?) are the Sith master and apprentice pair. The light side is a bit messed up at the moment, which not unlike the situation in Ep. IV where there is no clear master and all hopes lay on the shoulders of a young hopeful.

At the end of the day, the good guys win against overwhelming odds and there were a few casualties, most notably the passing of Han Solo who was revealed to be Kylo Ren's/Ben Solo's father. I would have liked it better if they had played up the father/son conflict a bit longer but well, it's not up to me.

What I find to be promising / exciting was the fact that Rey holds a lot of promise as the new lead. Her character is still a bit mysterious at this point and has a good amount of back story to it. It should be interesting to find out more about her.

Kylo Ren/Ben Solo also has a bit of promise. He could finally be the chosen one that would really bring balance to the force and that is the hope that I have for this character. He's conflicted and we have seen that he still has some light inside. Would be great to see it fleshed out.


All in all, a bit of nostalgia, a bit of disappointment and a little bit of hope.

Ratings : 3.5 out of 5 stars as a Star Wars fan, otherwise 3 stars out of 5.


shootkk
post Feb 19 2016, 11:06 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Deadpool (2016)

The most talked about movie so far. There's a lot of buzz about the R rating, the hopes of the fans that it won't suck and lately the rave about how much this movie has made so far. It has been breaking records.

Anyways, how was the movie? Is it as good as it is made out to be? To be frank (yes, it's Frank, not Francis!) the story is pretty straight forward and a little thin. Serviceable.

Ryan Reynolds is fine being Deadpool. Morena Baccarin as Vanessa, Wade's gal, is hot and fine to look at. The rest of the cast are ok but I especially liked Stefan Kapicic as Colossus.

Deadpool has to remind us, the audience, numerous times that he is not a superhero. He is just Deadpool and that's fine. The special effects are cool but sometimes the fast action scenes go by in a blur. Plenty of gore and f-bombs and that's the reason for the R rating and thank the stars that the Malaysian censorship showed some restraint here and did not butcher the film.

So Deadpool is Deadpool. If you're wanting to see Deadpool that this is the movie to catch. If you are not a fan and have limited exposure to the character then this may not be your cup of tea.

And please for heaven's sake DO NOT bring your children to see this movie!! It's rated R! And for the last time, THIS IS NOT A SUPERHERO MOVIE!

Rating : 3 out of 5 stars
shootkk
post Mar 26 2016, 06:27 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Batman v Superman : Dawn of Justice (2016)


This is most anticipated superhero movie of the year, if not the most anticipated movie of the year. Yes, we have all the Marvel stuff but this one is from DC and this one is supposedly going to kick off the Justice League! So yeah, the burden is heavy on this one and boy did the studios and director disappoint!

Right out I am going to say that this movie bombs! It bombs big time! I won't even recommend people to go see it but then people will still go see it.

This is not a Batman movie. This is not a Superman movie. In fact, I don't even know what movie this is. Yes. It is that bad.

This is the end of the non-spoiler review. If you haven't seen the movie and don't want it spoiled, then this is where the review ends. Else continue at your own risk:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Rating : 1.5 stars out of 5. 1 star for Wonder Woman and half star for the special effects. Proof yet again that special effects alone does not make a movie.
shootkk
post May 2 2016, 09:57 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Captain America : Civil War (2016)

When you want 2 heroes to fight each other, this is how you do it. Sorry guys, say what you want but Marvel did it again. DC should really learn how to do it right.

This is how you tell a story without losing the audience. You don't need to know the whole back story of all the characters to enjoy this movie. The pre-requisite is that you should watch the Captain America franchise but this is a Captain America sequel. Watching the Avengers will also give you a leg up but it is not a necessity.

2 heroes that are basically good guys but have differing ideology. Events happens that starts to tear them apart and external pressure pushes them over the edge. They don't enjoy whacking each other but they need to do what they need to do and what they think is the right thing to do.

The pacing here is good. The casting is also good. Actions sequences are sometimes a little hard to follow but overall good. The best thing here is how they present the characters. With each unfolding event, you get a bigger view of the person behind the hero. The become more human and you are more able to relate to them, unlike a certain other movie where you get only a brooding, angry person and a whiny alien.

I especially like how they introduced The Black Panther. Batman should take a hint from this feline themed hero and learn how to separate anger, vengeance and reasoning. Not be blind as a bat.

Oh, as far as bashing the 'other' movie goes, here's a movie with a genius of a villain. Take notes, DC. Lots of 'em.


Rating : 3.5 out of 5 stars.
shootkk
post Jun 9 2016, 11:36 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Warcraft : The Beginning (2016)

The tagline "The Beginning" got it right. This is the origin story for all movie goers, fans or non-fans of the games alike. You do not need to have played the game to enjoy this movie.

The story is fine and most will be able to follow it without any problems. The pacing is a little slow in the beginning but overall, it will run fine.

For fans of the game, I will say that this movie will give you more details of the orc clans that the game may not have delved into.

Go in with no expectations and this movie will do its job of entertaining you. It's not a great movie but it is far from a flop so you can safely buy a ticket and enjoy. I went in and came out expecting the next film.


Rating : 2.5 out of 5 stars.
shootkk
post Jun 16 2016, 02:47 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Finding Dory (2016)

Another sequel from Pixar. This time it is the sequel to one of Pixar's greatest hits, Finding Nemo (2003). All I can say is that I left the theatre with a little bit of apprehension.

Is Finding Dory good? The short answer is yes. It's entertaining enough. It's colourful, like its predecessor, which the kids will like. Dory is back, obviously and so is Marlin and Nemo but they take a back seat and Dory takes the centre stage. Apart from that we get other colourful characters that moves the tale along. Fine and dandy but it starts to feel kinda formulaic after a little while.

This time around, we see Dory going on a journey and from the trailers, we know that it's to find her family and that is what the movie basically is. Finding Dory seems to be missing the emotional core that Finding Nemo had that makes the movie compelling. We don't get or at least, I don't get the sense of urgency from the characters. In Finding Nemo, we rooted for Marlin and Dory every step of the way. In Nemo, we felt each setback and cheered for every success the characters experienced but that's missing in this movie.

Also, there are times when you find that things are a little too convenient to advance the plot in Finding Dory, for example the characters Destiny and Bailey. Luck plays a big part in Finding Nemo but the events never really felt contrived. In Finding Dory, some things seemed a little too easy to solve.

Overall, Finding Dory is still a nice little tale. It's all nice and warm but feels a little too targeted towards the kids. When the credits start rolling, it confirmed one of my fears. Pixar is losing its edge. The acquisition by Disney has given Disney animated feature films a leg up but I'm afraid that the leg came from Pixar's own production pool. Pixar's own features seem to be limping now. Jumping on to the sequel bandwagon has diluted the original spirit in Pixar which is never to make a movie unless you have a strong story.


Rating : 3 out of 5 stars (with 0.5 star awarded due to nostalgia)

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0921sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:50 PM