QUOTE(02286 @ Dec 27 2010, 10:47 PM)
http://www.lelong.com.my/m-sia-warranty-ni...1-12-Sale-P.htmPhotography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong
|
|
Dec 28 2010, 05:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 28 2010, 10:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
QUOTE(iilidan @ Dec 28 2010, 09:26 AM) since i never tried the d3100 then i cant say much..but a quick search from google (http://www.google.com.my/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=nikon+d3100+vs+d5000+comparison) reveals this: http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon_D3100-vs-Nikon_D5000 QUOTE Reasons to consider the Nikon D3100 vs d5000 Significantly larger screen . . . . . . 3,0" vs 2,7" = More than 10% larger screen Higher resolution movies ... 1080p @ 24fps vs 720p @ 24fps = Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video Continuously focuses recording movies ... Yes vs No = Record movies without worrying about focus Slightly lower noise at high ISO . . . . . 919 ISO vs 868 ISO = The D3100 has a slight edge (0,1 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance Smaller . . . 124x96x73 mm vs 127x104x80 mm = Around 20% smaller Significantly cheaper . . . 1 090 kr vs 4 965 kr = The best price we've seen is 3 875 kr cheaper (more than 4.5x less) Higher resolution . . . 14.2 MP vs 12.3 MP = Around 20% higher resolution Better boost ISO . . .12,800 ISO vs 6,400 ISO = The D3100's boost ISO is 1 f-stop better Lighter . . . 505 g vs 590 g = Around 20% lighter Thinner . . . 2,9" vs 3,1" = Around 10% thinner This post has been edited by freddy manson: Dec 28 2010, 10:18 AM |
|
|
Dec 30 2010, 11:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
QUOTE(fisherman10 @ Dec 30 2010, 11:04 AM) of course u do loose some detail. what i mean is, softwares like lightroom n photoshop nowadays are better at retaining details when removing noise compared to the older versions of the software. if they dont sell, then they wont have much resources to pull off all the juice.. QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 30 2010, 11:28 AM) QUOTE(KTCY @ Dec 30 2010, 11:34 AM) |
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 06:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
|
|
|
Jan 2 2011, 10:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 2 2011, 10:13 AM) Depends, not usually without flash on the D700 No la -.- its just a pair of small arms. Once you get used to it, no issues. after that, remove the VG and couple it with sb700.. aaahhh more comfortable.. |
|
|
Jan 11 2011, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,858 posts Joined: Jun 2006 From: Tawau, Sabah |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0203sec
0.93
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 10:05 AM |