Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V3, Dark Lord going strong

views
     
stsh90
post Jan 22 2011, 10:53 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
824 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: KL


QUOTE(PureGeek @ Jan 22 2011, 04:36 PM)
i just checked out nikon D3100, omg i was shocked to the quality of the camera... it is made in thailand, the cover for SD memory card is so loose it feels out of place shaky, the zoom was terrible and the salesman wasnt helping... he kept recommending panasonic lumix (a non dslr but it can zoom really really far and the quality is excellent for video and shooting)... wtf... i'm totally disappointed

the lens that come with it 18-55 is really sucks, cant zoom further than a digital cam >.< when the lens rotate out, it was so short like a small 2 inch lil bro -.-

furthermore, the rotate button to live view and viewfinder view is totally unresponsive, either that or the system is so slow to change mode...
*
QUOTE(kevin23 @ Jan 22 2011, 10:45 PM)
Just bot Nikon D3100...feel its a superb camera to use .

So easy to take good pics and very user friendly. rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
wonder why the former found it so crappy. whistling.gif
gnome
post Jan 22 2011, 10:56 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Yay tomorrow will be taking photos of a special star wars paintball game, hopefully wont get shot laugh.gif ...been lucky so far tongue.gif
General_Nic
post Jan 22 2011, 11:06 PM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(stsh90 @ Jan 22 2011, 10:53 PM)
wonder why the former found it so crappy. whistling.gif
*
cos he felt those 20-30x optical zoom superzoom prosumer cams r better? whistling.gif
PureGeek
post Jan 22 2011, 11:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(stsh90 @ Jan 22 2011, 10:53 PM)
wonder why the former found it so crappy. whistling.gif
*
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jan 22 2011, 11:06 PM)
cos he felt those 20-30x optical zoom superzoom prosumer cams r better?  whistling.gif
*
yes, and also the demo unit might have been abused to the extend that the modes take longer time to switch and the cover for memory card is out of place (like a proton car quality)
General_Nic
post Jan 22 2011, 11:31 PM

D5000 fully loaded n ready to shoot~!!
*******
Senior Member
3,508 posts

Joined: Apr 2009


QUOTE(PureGeek @ Jan 22 2011, 11:14 PM)
yes, and also the demo unit might have been abused to the extend that the modes take longer time to switch and the cover for memory card is out of place (like a proton car quality)
*
be my guest n try 1000D whistling.gif

anyway, jokes aside, 55-300 shud cost around rm1k
its possible to get it a bit lesser than 1k
can consider 55-200 too, shorter focal length, but AF faster than 55-300 in low light
celciuz
post Jan 22 2011, 11:55 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,035 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(razuryza @ Jan 22 2011, 04:19 PM)
but today, D3 discontinued ady.. D700 still selling and the oni FF got built in flash!  laugh.gif  thumbup.gif
*
Haha, true. Well guess its because the D700 is a semi pro class.

QUOTE(PureGeek @ Jan 22 2011, 04:36 PM)
i just checked out nikon D3100, omg i was shocked to the quality of the camera... it is made in thailand, the cover for SD memory card is so loose it feels out of place shaky, the zoom was terrible and the salesman wasnt helping... he kept recommending panasonic lumix (a non dslr but it can zoom really really far and the quality is excellent for video and shooting)... wtf... i'm totally disappointed

the lens that come with it 18-55 is really sucks, cant zoom further than a digital cam >.< when the lens rotate out, it was so short like a small 2 inch lil bro -.-

furthermore, the rotate button to live view and viewfinder view is totally unresponsive, either that or the system is so slow to change mode...
*
You just tried a bad copy, or an abused copy.

QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jan 22 2011, 04:44 PM)
a check with LYN's mitmivec D7000 kit is around rm4450
so rm4400 aint reli dirt cheap oso
most entry level camera r made in thailand la, even D5000, D90 n D7000

n wat u expect of 18-55, d number shows it d
on compact cam equivalent its only 3x optical zoom
even d high priced 18-200 is abt 11x optical zoom only
DSLR is not all abt zooms
if u wan long range there is 300mm, 400mm, 500mm, 600mm, but no zoom, n those costs tens of thousand to hundred thousands ringgit

n y u want lens to rotate out long?
expensive zoom lenses such as 24-70 n 70-200 dun even extends when they zoom

switching frm viewfinder to live view nid to wait d mirror to flip up n shutter to open, definitely will have some delays there
*
2470 goes in and out when you zoom.
PureGeek
post Jan 23 2011, 12:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Jan 22 2011, 11:31 PM)
be my guest n try 1000D  whistling.gif

anyway, jokes aside, 55-300 shud cost around rm1k
its possible to get it a bit lesser than 1k
can consider 55-200 too, shorter focal length, but AF faster than 55-300 in low light
*
if i'm getting the 55-300mm then it would be manual focus... the only delay for this lens is when auto mode only right?
elainor
post Jan 23 2011, 12:15 AM

Snap snap snap
******
Senior Member
1,095 posts

Joined: Apr 2010
From: Oggie Oggie Oggie!!!
user posted image
DSC_0897


Added on January 23, 2011, 12:16 ampic spam

This post has been edited by elainor: Jan 23 2011, 12:16 AM
PureGeek
post Jan 23 2011, 12:34 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
anyone here uses the 55-300mm lens?
Everdying
post Jan 23 2011, 12:36 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 22 2011, 08:21 PM)
mine working fine. smile.gif
my low light is something like f/1.8 at iso3200 getting around 1/30, 1/40 speed.
of cos it focuses, but roughly 30-40% will focus short...whereas my 70-300 vr even tho smaller aperture can focus more accurately.

even something like this messing around at 3am...fully extended at 300mm / iso6400...still focuses well enough.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


or another one same as the above also at 3am.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by Everdying: Jan 23 2011, 12:37 AM
blinkblink88
post Jan 23 2011, 01:09 AM

Blink Pets Bakery
****
Senior Member
650 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Kuala Lumpur & Selangor
QUOTE(alvinX @ Jan 22 2011, 05:44 PM)
whats de price for Tokina 12-24mm f4? other than this any other reasonable price wide angle lens? thanks
*
I would like to know it too.... biggrin.gif
bbuser91
post Jan 23 2011, 01:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(PureGeek @ Jan 22 2011, 04:36 PM)
i just checked out nikon D3100, omg i was shocked to the quality of the camera... it is made in thailand, the cover for SD memory card is so loose it feels out of place shaky, the zoom was terrible and the salesman wasnt helping... he kept recommending panasonic lumix (a non dslr but it can zoom really really far and the quality is excellent for video and shooting)... wtf... i'm totally disappointed

the lens that come with it 18-55 is really sucks, cant zoom further than a digital cam >.< when the lens rotate out, it was so short like a small 2 inch lil bro -.-

furthermore, the rotate button to live view and viewfinder view is totally unresponsive, either that or the system is so slow to change mode...
*
shocking.gif shocking.gif

18-55mm

I din find it suck anyway

Other Nikon Entry level camera also made in thailand -.-"

zoom does not matter with a dslr lar , go get telephoto zoom len , then compare to digital cam see which can zoom further

QUOTE(blinkblink88 @ Jan 23 2011, 01:09 AM)
I would like to know it too.... biggrin.gif
*
Tokina 12-24mm

around 2k to 2.2k for official

while 1.7++ for grey

if not mistaken lar , use tokina len will suffer from flare , CMIIW

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Jan 23 2011, 01:18 AM
skycrawler
post Jan 23 2011, 01:13 AM

New World ^^
*******
Senior Member
2,227 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Which has better quality? nikkor lens or Tamron lens?
celciuz
post Jan 23 2011, 01:19 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,035 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(skycrawler @ Jan 23 2011, 01:13 AM)
Which has better quality? nikkor lens or Tamron lens?
*
What lens versus what lens? But then again, Nikkor equivalent always beat the Tamron haha. Price also different already.
bbuser91
post Jan 23 2011, 01:21 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(skycrawler @ Jan 23 2011, 01:13 AM)
Which has better quality? nikkor lens or Tamron lens?
*
IMO, You cannot judge like this

I think you should pick same range len to compare

like 55-200 tamron compare to 55-200 nikkor
Kent3888
post Jan 23 2011, 01:28 AM

:+: ҜễЙΨ ™ © :+:
******
Senior Member
1,333 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 23 2011, 01:19 AM)
What lens versus what lens? But then again, Nikkor equivalent always beat the Tamron haha. Price also different already.
*
I don think there is any Tamron lens better den Nikkor if comparing head to head..... mayb extra function like the VC helps, but sharpness still lack I think.....
skycrawler
post Jan 23 2011, 01:32 AM

New World ^^
*******
Senior Member
2,227 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


Tamron lens is cheaper than nikkor lens?
Kent3888
post Jan 23 2011, 01:33 AM

:+: ҜễЙΨ ™ © :+:
******
Senior Member
1,333 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI


QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Jan 22 2011, 10:24 AM)
Get sigma 50mm.

Kent do you have pic shot by 35mm 1.8g? mind to show me some?
*
user posted image
DSC_0136 by Kent3888, on Flickr
aldosoesilo
post Jan 23 2011, 01:34 AM

I was like LOL :D
******
Senior Member
1,457 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 23 2011, 12:36 AM)
my low light is something like f/1.8 at iso3200 getting around 1/30, 1/40 speed.
of cos it focuses, but roughly 30-40% will focus short...whereas my  70-300 vr even tho smaller aperture can focus more accurately.

even something like this messing around at 3am...fully extended at 300mm / iso6400...still focuses well enough.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


or another one same as the above also at 3am.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Hmm.. I never face situation like that before. I mean never that dark. unless one time I do play stuff in the dark room and my 35mm couldn't focus at all. <- Eventually I use manual focus.


QUOTE(Kent3888 @ Jan 23 2011, 01:28 AM)
I don think there is any Tamron lens better den Nikkor if comparing head to head..... mayb extra function like the VC helps, but sharpness still lack I think.....
*
for me personally tamron 1750 is sharper compared to nikon 1750. what do you think? focus? Of course nikon beat tamron
Kent3888
post Jan 23 2011, 01:35 AM

:+: ҜễЙΨ ™ © :+:
******
Senior Member
1,333 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI


Heard somebody talking bout 55-200, spam old pic by 55-200 =D

user posted image
DSC_2311 by Kent3888, on Flickr


Added on January 23, 2011, 1:38 am
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Jan 23 2011, 01:34 AM)
Hmm.. I never face situation like that before. I mean never that dark. unless one time I do play stuff in the dark room and my 35mm couldn't focus at all. <- Eventually I use manual focus.
for me personally tamron 1750 is sharper compared to nikon 1750. what do you think? focus? Of course nikon beat tamron
*
For me I will choose the 17-50 VC over the nikkor 17-55, 1st is price, 2nd is the vc helps ppl like me alot, lol.... 35mm is quite sucks in bad lighting also ler, I just went out at Curve area, not very dark oso can't focus, cry.gif .....

This post has been edited by Kent3888: Jan 23 2011, 01:38 AM

126 Pages « < 123 124 125 126 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0188sec    0.84    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 02:20 PM