QUOTE(deathbringer @ Dec 29 2010, 07:02 PM)
i'm not really brand-specific. i just feel that the 17-70mm lens suits my needs and should compliment my 18-55 kit lens. i was aiming for the SAL18250 telephoto lens instead but i foresee that i'll just under-utilize it. if tamron offers a similar 17-70mm f2.8 lens, then i do not mind.

zstan: it states that it's "new" on Sigma's website. i think it's the non-OS, non-HSM model that was discontinued.
Pros and cons of the Sigma 17-70mm OS HSM
Pros:
1.HSM - silent focus, really useful in capturing video as AF noise will not be recorded as it is not present.
2.Very short MFD (Minimum focus distance) - 22cm. So you could practically take close-ups of pics and be creative. (p.s. Its a really good camwhore lens LOL!) Tamron 17-50mm has a MFD of 27mm and the Carl Zeiss 1680z has MFD of 35cm.
Albnok also refered to it as Sigma 17-70mm OS HSM "Macro" due to the short MFD and the long zoom which enables amazing close ups!
3.Built in OS - According to some reviews by people, the built in OS in the lens offers 1-2 stop extra image stabilization compared to the SSS in the Alpha bodies. It also offers stabilization in the view finder
Cons:
1.No constant aperature
2.Price (if compared to the Tamron 17-50mm)
Added on December 30, 2010, 10:32 amQUOTE(hiansitt @ Dec 30 2010, 11:55 AM)
if quality of photo is not a concern, 18250 giv great travel lens, no need change lens often..

if quality is important, don't consider buy lens with zoom factor greater than 3x
The CZ 1680z is a great lens which offers a 5x zoom factor. But its pricey
This post has been edited by yuhi: Dec 30 2010, 10:32 AM