A580 using which batt? i saw some stated FW..
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V49!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Jan 24 2011, 12:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#201
|
 
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2011, 03:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#202
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
i wonder why most no prefer 30mm and 50mm macro?
is it too wide? |
|
|
Jan 24 2011, 03:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#203
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(hiansitt @ Jan 24 2011, 03:12 PM) @8tvt i thought all macro shot need to be so close..i think the working distance is too close in order to get 1:1  i just use macro with tele+raynox.. so donno much about true macro lens working distance.. coz the lens will go out to scare the bugs..  so 100-150mm is more suitable? |
|
|
Jan 24 2011, 03:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#204
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
maybe manufacturing defect? luckily still under warranty..
|
|
|
Jan 24 2011, 03:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#205
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Jan 24 2011, 03:34 PM) longer focal length means you don't need to go soo damn near to your subjects to shoot macro. for example to shoot that tiny bug on that leaf. if i have a 30mm lens, to get 1:1 i need to go as near as maybe 10-15cm close to the bug before i can get that shot. with a 100mm lens, i can work at a distance of maybe 1 meter away? in this way, i can also not scare the bug away. some bugs are really sensitive towards movement and sound. i checked SP90 can do 1:1 also need 10cm WD.. where got the far away.. don't tell me 30mm/50mm need 1cm only..  This post has been edited by 8tvt: Jan 24 2011, 03:55 PM |
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 08:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#206
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
not hot eh wear that masked costume?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 03:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#207
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
thinking to get that sigma.. how much?
Added on January 25, 2011, 3:35 pm QUOTE(albnok @ Jan 25 2011, 02:45 PM) Sony 30mm F2.8 DT SAM Macro = 13cm MFD Minolta/Sony 50mm F2.8 Macro = 20cm MFD Tamron 90mm F2.8 Macro = 29cm MFD Sigma 105mm F2.8 Macro = 31cm MFD Minolta/Sony 50mm F2.8 Macro = 35cm MFD Sigma 180mm F2.8 Macro = 38cm MFD that MFD for 1:1? This post has been edited by 8tvt: Jan 25 2011, 03:35 PM |
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#208
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(cjlai @ Jan 25 2011, 04:14 PM) not really the cost of the lens... is bcoz the HSM version is 82mm filter size while all my filters are 77mm.... wah 7years warranty.. HSM should a bit faster right?consider HSM doesn't help much in UWA.... tat's y i decided on the cheaper non HSM version  i thought got 10-20mm f/4-5.6 with HSM? |
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#209
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
oho.. no HSM for sony..
err tamron 10-24mm not good? i notice it has f/3.5-4.5.. atleast can stop down to evade the softness? |
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 04:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#210
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
meant new stock la.. no need to worry about DSLT.. huhu
|
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 05:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#211
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(cjlai @ Jan 25 2011, 04:51 PM) check here and decide for urself..... the output from HSM and non-HSM is same?http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-...-review?start=1 http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-...5_nikon?start=1 porkchop, do you notice alot of CA by using tamron? |
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 05:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#212
|
|
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
cjlai
please poison more the uwa result..  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0438sec
 0.88
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 09:58 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.