Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx Is Planning Revising Fair Usage Policy, Do you agree or not ? Please Vote Now ?

views
     
Huntsman
post Apr 17 2011, 01:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Penang


they should improve their available bandwidth instead of capping everyone using FUP as an pathetic excuse. they charge us with ridiculously high fees yet unable to give us the service they promised. and when we started to complain, they use FUP as a shield to cover their butts.... wat a shame
Huntsman
post Apr 20 2011, 08:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Penang


QUOTE(biatche @ Apr 20 2011, 12:19 PM)
dear conference users.

so users give in
and how exactly does tm give in?

malaysian internet is already behind other countries. do you not agree?
*
they sure have to. by removing the caps and improve on their available bandwidth.
Huntsman
post Apr 21 2011, 06:45 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Penang


QUOTE(biatche @ Apr 21 2011, 12:56 AM)
its logical they set caps because of "abusive" users. actually, can't quite say its abusive because of the way they advertised their products in the beginning and now.

so now, they wanna cut bandwidth of abusive users.. and....... give the bandwidth to....... other users? do other users need this bandwidth?

are we going to see reduced pricing? or higher burst rates?

no use ranting.. if bn continues to rule, internet will just continue to suck.
*
they shouldnt cap others for watever reason. since they promised us a bandwidth, they should keep their promise instead. if they cant supply the bandwidth which leads to bad internet experience for others, well that is streamyx's fault.

plus, if they really need to cap our bandwidth, charge us at a lower rate then...

n totally agree bout the BN thing
Huntsman
post Apr 26 2011, 09:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Penang


srsly i would love to switch over to another ISP, but there aint any choice for my area... streamyx is the only landline based ISP here.. wireless solutions wont do since im a gamer and latency matters alot.

lol its obvious tat streamyx sucks but so many of us are still using it. so wat do we do next?
Huntsman
post May 14 2011, 11:17 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
38 posts

Joined: Dec 2010
From: Penang


TM should NOT cap anyone with watever reason. we sign up for a stated speed at (maybe) a stated quota. so its TM's job to ensure we get wat we signed up for. n lets say if we hv maxed out our quota then do wat maxis broadband do, lower our speed. now TAT's acceptable. wat TM is now doing is capping EVERYONE so that they can cater more people with their mediocre bandwidth.

the correct way to solve all these problems is actually to UPGRADE their equipments or watever technical stuff they have to increase the available bandwidth and improve connectivity instead of crying about users being abusive n bla bla bla nonsense. they charge us with so high a fee yet cutting corners all these years, surely they hv stashes of cash lying around that would be ENOUGH to upgrade their stuff.

conclusion, STOP accusing users to be abusive and IMPROVE available bandwidth instead

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0690sec    1.00    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:14 PM