Jan 17 2011, 11:02 PM
QUOTE(matD @ Jan 16 2011, 06:04 PM)
Wah, got a call from "TM Customer Service Billing" - i paid half only this month, plan to pay later next week.
Operator: Selamat Petang Encik, saya dari TM bla bla bla mendapati account bill encik ada tertunggak bayaran sebanyak....
Aku: Wah, cepat TM. Aku punye streamyx slow nak mampus bulan lepas ade ko orang telipon. Aku lewat bayar seminggu pun cepat ko orang ambil tindakan!
Operator: Terima Kasih Encik. HANGUP!!!!!!
Very good customer service. Fast service.
Malaysia BOLEH......BLAH!!!!!
i came across....my dad hav settle the bill....but duno what happen to pos malaysia...lambat paid TM or wad....my service terus got terminate Operator: Selamat Petang Encik, saya dari TM bla bla bla mendapati account bill encik ada tertunggak bayaran sebanyak....
Aku: Wah, cepat TM. Aku punye streamyx slow nak mampus bulan lepas ade ko orang telipon. Aku lewat bayar seminggu pun cepat ko orang ambil tindakan!
Operator: Terima Kasih Encik. HANGUP!!!!!!
Very good customer service. Fast service.
Malaysia BOLEH......BLAH!!!!!
QUOTE(Flaming_lion @ Jan 17 2011, 09:26 PM)
Pathetic attempt by a GLC... They intent to make little investments but want to make as much cash as they can as a monopoly... Its a real disgusting piece of business... If they could, they'd charge everyone RM 88 a month for not using the internet...
The capping TM has been suggesting shows how poor they have been in planning and strategizing plus how little they care about their subscribers... 60GB for 5Mbps for UniFi and 25GB for 4Mbps and 10GB for 1Mbps is a joke... We are already paying an extremely high price for outdated technology... Its not the public's fault if TM is incompetent in providing proper service...
TM is going on the assumption that if minus piracy, internet users are only going to use the internet for YouTube and Facebook... Goes to show the people in TM are dumb idiots who just refuse to do any market research, or is it perhaps they just don't care since they are a full time monopoly...
Internet evolution is not something you can predict... Just look at how the internet has evolved from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 and any moment now, we could going to Web 3.0... People now can Skype with HD webcams and people can now stream all sorts of internet podcast and download interactive LEGAL contents... Next stage of the internet development is going to see the growth of Cloud Computing...
Do TM actually take these things into consideration or do they intent to ignore all these things and only do something about it when these things become a norm??? Typical GLC always planning for short-term profits... On what bloody research did TM base on when they came up with these caps??? How do they which is the right amount for each customer??? Why do they go on the assumption that there's a chance that every customer in an area is going to be online at the same to download something???
Just because they failed to plan in providing ports and bandwidth simply because they weren't intelligent enough to plan, doesn't mean they have a right to bluff consumers... I'm leaving TM if they ever implement this cap... They can't even provide 4Mbps in my area despite numerous inquiries but they want me not use the internet while still paying RM 88??? I don't think so!!!
dont have to said TM ini itu already.....The capping TM has been suggesting shows how poor they have been in planning and strategizing plus how little they care about their subscribers... 60GB for 5Mbps for UniFi and 25GB for 4Mbps and 10GB for 1Mbps is a joke... We are already paying an extremely high price for outdated technology... Its not the public's fault if TM is incompetent in providing proper service...
TM is going on the assumption that if minus piracy, internet users are only going to use the internet for YouTube and Facebook... Goes to show the people in TM are dumb idiots who just refuse to do any market research, or is it perhaps they just don't care since they are a full time monopoly...
Internet evolution is not something you can predict... Just look at how the internet has evolved from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0 and any moment now, we could going to Web 3.0... People now can Skype with HD webcams and people can now stream all sorts of internet podcast and download interactive LEGAL contents... Next stage of the internet development is going to see the growth of Cloud Computing...
Do TM actually take these things into consideration or do they intent to ignore all these things and only do something about it when these things become a norm??? Typical GLC always planning for short-term profits... On what bloody research did TM base on when they came up with these caps??? How do they which is the right amount for each customer??? Why do they go on the assumption that there's a chance that every customer in an area is going to be online at the same to download something???
Just because they failed to plan in providing ports and bandwidth simply because they weren't intelligent enough to plan, doesn't mean they have a right to bluff consumers... I'm leaving TM if they ever implement this cap... They can't even provide 4Mbps in my area despite numerous inquiries but they want me not use the internet while still paying RM 88??? I don't think so!!!
they just want make more money from US
btw...at those apa gathering gathering are useless no ppl dare to voice out the real problem. all they know its sit and listen to TM crap
This post has been edited by herojack41: Jan 17 2011, 11:03 PM
Quote
0.3573sec
0.55
7 queries
GZIP Disabled