Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Streamyx Streamyx Is Planning Revising Fair Usage Policy, Do you agree or not ? Please Vote Now ?

views
     
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 02:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(vapeace @ Dec 18 2010, 02:10 PM)
tipu lah.. 750TB even server hosting give 500TB bandwidth  laugh.gif  750TB for entire nation is ridiculous
*
Correction I miscalculated. It supposed to be 7500K TB for 3 000 000 streamyx users. Correct me if I am wrong but each streamyx users can download 2.5TB.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 18 2010, 02:22 PM
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 03:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(vapeace @ Dec 18 2010, 03:13 PM)
I think there a few confusion here

Volume based (VB) is TM give you 150GB per-month, once you exceed. For Example, for every 1Gb you exceed the 150GB limit, you have to pay RM2. Speed still maintain and not throttled to 10%

Limited bandwidth ( LB) is also almost the same, TM give you 150GB per-month, but once you exceed the 150GB, your speed drop to 10% or 20% of your package speed. You dont pay extra for every data you download after exceed the limit. Currently applied to UNIFI

MX150, i hope you can update this at main page..

i definitely go for Limited Bandwidth (LB) no matter what.. at 10% speed ( for example i 4mbps, 10% = 0.4Mbps) 0.4Mbps is good enough for browsing but not heavy download..

VL force me to pay extra for the same speed for every data i download.. This is sucking money out of my wallet
*
Yes, this is more appropriate. I don't think TM by its nature can magically create the bandwidth for user even though they can spend their profit to upgrade our infrastructure.
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 04:00 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
So much this law, rule are created in order to save and feed cronies, with expenses of voter & consumer. Our taxes go to HSBB unless most of us here run from tax. Because I feel that some of people here try to defend how TM do business. We as the consumer were choked and were forced to accept their way of doing. 1mbps is considered low enough and to get capped is very unfair.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 18 2010, 04:01 PM
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 04:11 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(maranello55 @ Dec 18 2010, 04:10 PM)
i signed for unlimited. If they change this, i will sue them. I do not agree to this.

But then they will play with the clause 'we have the rights to change the policy without prior notice'

so i say fakit. I just save my fukken breath n take wuteva shit they give since wut we say never matters.
*
Please sue them. I have neither resources nor courage to do that.
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 04:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(biatche @ Dec 18 2010, 04:31 PM)
Do not compromise with them for they will only compromise you. Everything that is planned for will benefit them in every way. They have nothing to lose.

I repeat, if they are going to take something away from the users, they also need to return something. Wanna do 25GB / month cap? They can also bill RM25 / month. We'll dl 75GB more to make it RM100 / month and they have their profits there.

In any case, to whatever they are doing. Say no.
*
How to say no. If we can say that easily, we never get into this mess at first place.
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 07:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(iipohbee @ Dec 18 2010, 07:16 PM)
Actually for a normal user 60Gb is very much to spare already.How can those wireless isp users live with only 3-10GB quota every month if this is not true?
To download a few DVDs every day is not a normal habit. It's wastage because you don't get to watch all of it unless you're those jobless lowlifes.
Then again you would want subscribers to fell happy by allowing them to download some when they have the spare time as a hobby.
The key here is to avoid wastage and abnormal usage.

It is actually not complicating. Tiered pay as you use(PAYU) with minimum monthly commitments.

To simplify things enough no speed limitations or different speeds with different packages.
Only 1 package type to take care about.So the only thing you need to take care about is the volume meter.

Those how use more of course pay more la. Use 1TB with RM2 per GB, then pay RM2k lor for the month.Get punished lor.
*
If you got skill like most IT specialist, mostly you only have to sit at home and connect through VPN doing your job while downloading HD pRon. And we are not using broadband alone, we are using it with other member inside home.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 18 2010, 07:33 PM
takercena
post Dec 18 2010, 07:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(iipohbee @ Dec 18 2010, 07:33 PM)
Then the home package should not be the right package for such people.
Probably they should opt for SOHO or something..

Sitting at home and work through VPN with offshore companies?
Wait till the lembaga hsail comes after you when your offshore company banks in your salary directly into your personal account escaping tax.
*
They do not have to that. They are just employee. Why applying for SOHO? And why bring lembaga hasil in this discussion?
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 12:19 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(iipohbee @ Dec 19 2010, 12:07 AM)
50GB is plenty to go for most people.

You're already getting 10X of what the mobile broadband users are getting or even more when they can live with a 3GB or less quota.

Now the question is can TM maintain a good quality service once this is implemented?

Those who are currently on 4mbps plan you should stay and not downgrade/upgrade your packages because your previous contract did not have this VL clauses.
*
Can you just cut out this mobile broadband bullshit discussion? This is fixed line with broadband issue. Mobile broadband is another things. I got one also and obviously most people that opt for this don't care about downloading at all.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 19 2010, 12:22 AM
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 12:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(iipohbee @ Dec 19 2010, 12:24 AM)
What bullshit? Whether it's mobile broadband or fixed line both rely on the same undersea cables at the IG.
*
Then I believe I am correct. You are full of crap.
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 12:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(vearn29 @ Dec 19 2010, 12:52 AM)
personally i prefer Uncapped Volume Based. No throttle after exceed predefined monthly bandwidth. Hopefully it will educate user to control their usage
dun worry, zam will out of picture soon, Bijan already show hand in TM. Be prepared to fucuk upside down
each user? are you kidding me. that will cost more. what do you expect from TM a.k.a Tahu Membazir
*
Well unless you guys not realize, I think most of us that replied to impact@tm were screwed. Check back previous message and you will notice they stated that "we already optimize their profile".
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 01:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(kaiserreich @ Dec 19 2010, 01:07 AM)
While we are here arguing about the merits of internet capping,

we have this happening in canada
source
*
Yes of course, this kind of service will force me to leave Malaysia because there is no initiative from government to help consumer innovating.
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 09:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
Ok now there is no more privacy using VPN. Nice nice.
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 09:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
It's funny if this bullshit is going to be implemented. I guess most of us are nerd here and scare to riot.
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 10:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(MX510 @ Dec 19 2010, 09:53 AM)
So if we are setting up an online petition would it help ?

This does happened to m2u when they want to charge their m2u online banking few years ago and they back it off :-)
*
Yea I think so, but first we need to know the best solutions to be chose from.
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 10:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
I choose we revert back what ever is done last month to before last month.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 19 2010, 10:19 AM
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 10:24 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
Slowing down p2p will generate more money for VPN admins. However TM also want to see what is inside the tunnel. So how about no more p2p in Malaysia?

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 19 2010, 10:25 AM
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 10:32 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(herojack41 @ Dec 19 2010, 10:28 AM)
P2P were the main factor causing slowdown,congestion and hogging the LINE.

also...p2p were illegal due to MOST 99.99% people are using it to get pirated things and p2p have no benefit AT ALL. *i mean in comercial ways,imagine your hardwork been dist as free....like movie,songs and software*
*
In commercial way? You mean getting patch or update for games up to 2-3 GB? Ok now I know why it is illegal.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 19 2010, 10:32 AM
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 12:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(vapeace @ Dec 19 2010, 12:43 PM)


c) At least guarantee 80 - 90% of speed obtained <- this will fail from beginning as TM cant do that for ADSL user. Copper problem, distance etc etc, anyway i just include it

*
Where all TM profits being flushed to?

takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 07:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(Oga @ Dec 19 2010, 06:23 PM)
- Let the speeds be fast as it was before the mess began.
- 30-40GB monthly limit for 1Mbps streamyx users (Price= RM88 or less nationwide + STANDARDIZED)

That's all I care about. Deal with it TM.
*
OGA that's unreasonable, even Youtube also provide us HD contents which is sometime more than 1GB.

This post has been edited by takercena: Dec 19 2010, 07:23 PM
takercena
post Dec 19 2010, 07:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
327 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
QUOTE(mylinear @ Dec 19 2010, 07:50 PM)
I do not think we should accept that 25GB figure from TM.  If you use 30GB, do you consider yourself as a heavy user if you are doing normal surfing activities?

I hope you read my post #414. I think we are on the wrong track of trying to decide what is fair for everyone when there should be no need to do so.
*
The thing we should do is riot!!!

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0629sec    0.16    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 02:42 PM