what i said is about current. that's y i vote for X10. actually it's depends on how u use, for me is studies and working, so i chose X10. For you guys are gamer, wan the apps & wan follow the trend then you go for iphone4. In my mind, X10 lose to iphone4 coz the screen is 65k Color (X10) and 16m  (Iphone4) and X10 dun have multitouch. other than that, X10 rocks

1. "the extra rm600 you pay for iP4 based on specs is for the [attention]"

This is still stupid. As someone mentioned, Iphones are so damn common nowadays and 9 out of 10 screens that are lit up in a cinema before a movie starts are Iphones. What's there to pay attention to if someone is holding phone that's so common? Either way, it's just a phone. So please clarify if you can. Otherwise, it's just a really stupid statement made by you. But perhaps you meant something else, like

First of all, I think I made it pretty clear that I was paraphrasing another poster in this thread on the "9 out of 10" statement. Here, I'll even find the original post for you:

"No offense but in the cinemas, before the show starts, 9 out of 10 lit screens are iPhones.

Too common if you ask me."

Page 2, comment by Vince1991.

And secondly, there is no mention of anything about iphones and cinema goers in the link you provided? Did you post the wrong reference link by mistake? Or were you simply trying to mislead?

As for the name calling part, so it was ok for him to be the first one to throw an insult, but when other people retaliate, they need to "grow up"? What are you? His backside buddy coming to his defense?

Also maybe you didn't notice, but I am not the one making assumptions. The person who said "the extra rm600 you pay for iP4 based on specs is for the social status" is. It was a lousy assumption, I pointed out it, and he seems to have taken offense. And that, is what is going on.

So, lesson for you, at least get your bearings right and know what is going on before you start butting in on other people's discussion, yea?

---

Added on December 21, 2010, 1:17 pm
Just a slight comment, but I'm not sure, I don't think there was ever an Iphone2? It was just the Iphone, and then the Iphone 3G?
This goes a full circle back to your "the extra rm600 you pay for iP4 based on specs is for the social status" statement.

Really, I'm curious. What kind of social status does an Iphone confer on its holder?

And you claim that this is the general perspective. By who? Seems like it's just you who is somehow having this fantasy of the Iphone giving its user some kind of social status.

Like I said, that worker in that Boost Juice kiosk had an Iphone. So she has kind of social status because of her Iphone?

And what about the sales "manager" of my previous company, whose daily job includes going to our client's office and sitting in their pantry and bug them until she could sell some of our product to them. I suppose she has some special social status too, because she holds an Iphone?

Anyhow, you go ahead and choose to go on living with this little Iphone fantasy of yours. I just realized that it's not really anyone's loss.

You, Sir, are in fact the perfect market for the Iphone. Please stick with it, and make sure that you are the first in the line when the Iphone5 comes out. Wouldn't want to miss out of the social status now, would you?

Like I said, get your bearings right. Don't butt in to a discussion with no knowledge of what is going on. You do realize that by posting that flame bait in your previous post, you sound more like a troll than anything, right?

And figures? What figures?

Like I said, the link you supplied is a report on Nokia's market position compared to other phone makers. No mention of "not even half a person (0.4 to be exact) out of 10 people in a cinema uses an iPhone" as claimed by you. A report about a phone makers' market share has no direct relevance to how many people sitting in a cinema uses a certain phone. So you do realize that it looks like you are trying to mislead people, right?

And even if we give you all the benefit of the doubt. Even if assuming that what you said is totally true, there is still the question of why you are addressing this to me. Again, like I said, I was paraphrasing someone else. If you have an issue with the stats, take it up with the original poster, don't waste my bandwidth.

If you care to clarify, by all means go ahead. If you don't, then what is the point of posting this one liner? Further trolling? 

---

Added on December 22, 2010, 11:49 am
No, not really. I'm not the one who needs to post flame baits and meaningless one-liners in an online forum as an outlet for the angst issues in his life. 

You know, several posts back, when I first saw your post, I thought we'd have a good discussion on our hands, since here was someone who looked like he can present his case intelligently, backed up with statistics too.

But several posts later, this is what you are reduced to. Counting the number of lines in my posts. That's so typical, yea? When caught in a corner with nothing to say, start with the one line babbles in an attempt divert attention and trivialize everything. Sad, but very typical. 

If this is the best you can do, then I have no more use for you. At least guys like Aurai and FallenOut tries to make a coherent case for themselves. Have a good life.

---

Added on December 22, 2010, 5:10 pm
Thank you so much for this information?