QUOTE(+3kk! @ Dec 14 2010, 03:55 PM)
the over reliance on ramps as a strategy is weak. its old and as old as the days of sparta, its common sense to fight at choke points with a smaller force but to rely that as a common gameplay tactic is just sad. i mean really CHOKE POINTS?
dont you guys feel cheated that after the much hype of strategy ramp playing seems to take center stage? to me its lazy cause really, thats the oldest gameplay trick in the book.
heres the gig, you put 200 bucks into a game that was in development for a decade that got divided into 3 installments and each installment costs probably 200 bucks. thus for the trilogy you need to pay 600 bucks, which i doubt the later installments would have any different multi player systems. for the above market price im sorry im not sold with "the same game but better graphics", im expecting more a LOT more for that premium price and im not giving a hoot that its SC thus blizzard can bank on it
however, this line is where i get even more frust. games are a form of entertainment, by far its a toy, its never ment to be competitive cause that spoils the fun of it. to say starcraft is worth its value in money cause its "competitive" and its a "sport" just blows my mind, it is both NOT a competition and a sport. the only nation that treats SC that seriously is Korea and even then they dont treat SC2 that seriously.
asking me to pay 200 quid for a game pretending to be a competitive sport is fallacy. go tell anyone "hey, i am an e-athlete cause i play SC2" and youd get
.
a game that costs 200 bucks need its good value of money, i dont see any value of it
SC2 an esport? SRSLY? dont you guys feel cheated that after the much hype of strategy ramp playing seems to take center stage? to me its lazy cause really, thats the oldest gameplay trick in the book.
heres the gig, you put 200 bucks into a game that was in development for a decade that got divided into 3 installments and each installment costs probably 200 bucks. thus for the trilogy you need to pay 600 bucks, which i doubt the later installments would have any different multi player systems. for the above market price im sorry im not sold with "the same game but better graphics", im expecting more a LOT more for that premium price and im not giving a hoot that its SC thus blizzard can bank on it
however, this line is where i get even more frust. games are a form of entertainment, by far its a toy, its never ment to be competitive cause that spoils the fun of it. to say starcraft is worth its value in money cause its "competitive" and its a "sport" just blows my mind, it is both NOT a competition and a sport. the only nation that treats SC that seriously is Korea and even then they dont treat SC2 that seriously.
asking me to pay 200 quid for a game pretending to be a competitive sport is fallacy. go tell anyone "hey, i am an e-athlete cause i play SC2" and youd get
a game that costs 200 bucks need its good value of money, i dont see any value of it
Go play the custom games, they are more fun in some ways, gives you the worth of your money
This post has been edited by MYNAMEISJASON: Dec 14 2010, 04:53 PM
Dec 14 2010, 04:52 PM

Quote
0.0174sec
1.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled