agreed

how old are you?

wow. youhave an eye for details sinc eyou cna tell he's born in 1975 just by his username. Lol..

anyway, rm140k at age 36 aint that awesome.

Whether is rm140k at age of 37 average or not depends on how u define the population. If put int he context of the whole population of Malaysian, it can be said as way off the chart, definitely above average if not rare.

But, if u define the statistical population as those with degrees and above, I would hazard a guess that it's uncommon, though not average.

But, put as this thread is about whetehr should TS choose Bank Negara or KPMG and enter as an officer/exec level, we should define the the context of population as those with the capabilities to enter these and firms of the same level (namely MNC, big 4, GLC), namely those with professional qualifications and/or thos ewith second upper degree and above.

In this context, gaining a total compensation of 140k ringgit at 37, which is after 14 years of working, can be said as average.

P/S: This is in no way meant to degrade anyone. I just wanna point out so as to let TS ppl make a proper choice. There are mor epeople who are in audit than Bank Negara, and since audit is a good career after all, it wont be suprising to see there are more posting here saying audit is a better choice, etc etc and this might clouds other young aspiring graduates' judgement in choosing their career path. Not ot sya one is better than the other, but I just want to point out that compensation given by audit firms are just on par with other firms, not too great, not too lil

This post has been edited by Knight_2008: Jan 9 2012, 10:22 PM

lol. you have no idea how sought after u are if you have experience in bank negara, especially in dept such as the eocnomics dept.