QUOTE(lltee @ Feb 22 2011, 07:57 PM)
Hi, I need some advices from seniors here.
Im fresh graduate, is it good to start work in a small or medium audit firm for about 1 year first before applying a job in big 4s or straight away apply a job in big 4s? This is because I want to get some exposures on how the audit works actually like since I dont hav intern program in my degree course. Through this, I think the experience will help me to mentally n physically prepared for the works in big 4s.
Thanks in advance for the advices.
As an intern you will not be subject to the same pressures and responsibility as a full time staff. If your intention is to "mentally and physically" prepare yourself, then it won't work. Bite the bullet and do it. If you are dead-set on doing an internship then do it during your semester break. You don't need an internship course to do internship. I did a 3-yr local degree with no internship course and I did my own internship every year-end semester break.
Added on February 23, 2011, 9:28 amQUOTE(Jannie87 @ Feb 22 2011, 07:55 PM)
Thanks for the input,Jenatic & CKJMark..noted

was thinking of audit associate in EY though..but do we have to take up the professional paper right after we start working or do they give a time frame?what if i'm not interested in taking the professional paper?LOL..will i have lower chance of getting into big4?
If you are doing audit, you MAY be required to take up professional papers. It was compulsory during my time, but policies may have changed in the audit dept. Can't really say for sure.
It is advisable to start the paper as soon as possible to save time. If you think you don't have time now as a staff, you will have less time as a senior. In some firms, having a professional paper is contingent to your promotion as well. The practice differs from firm-to-firm.
My question to you is why are you not keen on taking a professional paper if its fully paid for? Are you not interested in improving yourself in terms of your profession of choice? Do you think it will be too difficult for you to manage?
Whether this will be detrimental to your chances in getting in, my point of view is yes, definitely. If, as a hirer, I had the choice between a candidate that wants to improve their own knowledge and qualifications vs someone who didn't, which candidate do you think I would hire?
This post has been edited by CKJMark: Feb 23 2011, 10:26 AM