Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Wanna buy New Camera? Undecided which to choose?V4, ASK HERE! Dont create a thread elsewher

views
     
geekster129
post Dec 7 2010, 12:25 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(-kytz- @ Dec 7 2010, 12:18 PM)
If still can't decide... see your photography kakis . If mostly Sony, then you choose Sony la.

If your friends all play with Canon, and you pulak go and buy a Sony. Then you'll be lonely la

"Birds of the same feather, flock together"
*
Wow! Peer pressure wei. tongue.gif
geekster129
post Dec 17 2010, 01:34 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(hikari @ Dec 17 2010, 02:42 AM)
Hi All, I'm trying to venture into photography using DSLR and I'm looking at the following options.

Type of camera/lens/accesories :  DSLR
Budget: Max RM3.3-3.4k? (max for me is nikon D90)
Your Location:   KL
Preferable brand : Nikon
Type of photography u want to do : Anything as of now, no specific ones.
Any specific models in mind? :  D90 or D5000
Any specific features u want? :  no specific ones

Looking at the specs, both D90 and D5000 look similar. D5000 is more beginner friendly and D90 is more forward looking (i.e. can offer more controls when I get used to it etc?). I have hold both of my friends' D90 and D5000, I find the weight okay for D90 and D5000 is probably just a bit too small but unnoticable for me. I really dont know which to pick and if there are any differences that I should know but I dont yet.

So should I spend more on D90 or buy D5000+lens/extra battery etc? Is the picture quality the same (if used by the same person)?

Additional info: I have been playing with my P&S camera for 2 years which has manual controls on iso, aperture and shutter. So I'm a little exposed to what are these about.

Thanks guys!
*
One of the difference is that the D5000 does not have a built in AF motor within the body but D90 has it. So, some cheaper primes like 50mm f/1.8D if used with D5000 you won't be able to use Autofocus thus manually focusing it, so you need to get a more expensive 50mm (which usually costs 2x more) like a 50mm G lens which has a built in AF motor within the lens itself to have autofocus in D5000.

It again, boils down to how you plan to upgrade your glasses in the future. If you don't mind spending more for G-type lenses and then later on upgrade to a more high end body, there's no harm doing it, because it is still compatible with higher end bodies, anyway.

This post has been edited by geekster129: Dec 17 2010, 02:52 PM
geekster129
post Dec 17 2010, 05:46 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(hikari @ Dec 17 2010, 05:09 PM)
thanks. but i'm more concerned bout picture quality. does it differ?
if manual focus, d90 is better right since it has pentaprism and higher magnification of viewfinder?
thanks. but i dont have any lens in mind that i want to get except for 35mm f1.8 nikkor, which also comes with AF motor in the lens itself. any future lens that will be produced will also include AF motor right?

I'm actually contemplating, because I can get a D5000 with 18-55mm kit lens + a 35mm f1.8 + extra battery compared to only D90 with 18-105mm kits lens. however, is the extra battery necessary in D90? i'm so confused nowwww  sad.gif
*
I still find the viewfinder small. It's APS-C, anyway. Can't expect much.

This post has been edited by geekster129: Dec 17 2010, 05:46 PM
geekster129
post Mar 18 2011, 03:54 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(maranello55 @ Mar 18 2011, 03:31 PM)
O yes...its a nightmare with build in flash....no flash, everything got motion blur lol


Added on March 18, 2011, 3:32 pm
Ah ok....will look into that as well...thanks!  notworthy.gif
*
Just make sure you don't shoot anything pitch black, like this pic by a "paid professional photographer" with "7 years of experience"

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by geekster129: Mar 18 2011, 03:55 PM
geekster129
post Mar 18 2011, 04:14 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(heinlein @ Mar 18 2011, 03:59 PM)
Could you share with us how to take photo under that situation whereby all the lights are off and only lit up with a few candles? I mean capture that moment, the mood whereby dun want the flashgun spoil the whole thing?
*
Well, this is the worst case scenario that any photographers will face - No lights. The candles generally won't be bright enough to lit the couples in a creative way, the bride and the bridegroom will still look severely underexposed, because there is just insufficient light illuminating them.

Any experienced photographers will tell you - No light = No Photography.

That is where we are left with 2 options to create light.

1. Either you have to negotiate with the hotel/restaurant manager to use at least some sort of a spotlight to create a romantic/grand feel. Let's face it. It's not just about your photographs. It just doesn't make sense if the guests couldn't be able to see the lovely bride where she would have already spent more than 2 hours with make-up to make herself look pretty during the wedding march itself. You can still go without flash.

2. Yes. Use a flashgun. I'm not joking. I'm serious. That's the last resort you have to take when all else fails.

Flashgun, contrary to many beliefs, makes a photo look harsh and unnatural, very cave-like. However, if flash is used correctly, could yield very interesting results. Think studio lighting. If you position your flash in such a way it illuminates your subject in a directional way (maybe from sides, etc), it can yield artistic results. Also if the flashgun is used correctly, it can dramatically create the mood of the shot while not ruining it.

This post has been edited by geekster129: Mar 18 2011, 04:15 PM
geekster129
post Mar 18 2011, 05:52 PM

Janitor
******
Senior Member
1,180 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: *awaiting GPS accuracy*



QUOTE(heinlein @ Mar 18 2011, 05:32 PM)
It's really hard for me to capture this kind of photo (btw, Im not the photographer of tat photo). Tripod is out of the question since the subject is constant moving. Need to find out what are the usable ISO with acceptable noise. I would use fastest lens at disposal for exposing enough lights and use a continuous focus and burst mode. I can't think of better dslr for the job except D3S. Correct me if I'm wrong.
*
That's why you hire professional photographers to do the job. icon_idea.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0489sec    0.20    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 03:49 AM