Dolby vs DTS
|
|
 Dec 2 2010, 04:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Perak  
|
QUOTE(sooieweng @ Dec 2 2010, 01:56 AM) Dolby True-HD best, DTS-HD too noise.. For audio format, I prefer DTS-HD MA than Dolby TrueHD For matrix upmixing, I prefer Dolby Prologic than DTS Neo For Headphone, I prefer Dolby headphone For virtual speaker/surround, I dont like virtual surround |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 10:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Perak
|
PCM is almost uncompressed audio format.
DTS HDMA and True HD is loss-less compress format. DD+ and DTS is lossy compress format. Technically, PCM should be more superior (bit rate can reach up to 6Mbps). This post has been edited by ariff_tech: Dec 2 2010, 10:33 PM |
|
|
Dec 3 2010, 12:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Perak
|
QUOTE(lee_lnh @ Dec 3 2010, 01:58 AM) reason: trend for comin 2011 dolby getting less and less is because of royalty issue~ yeah,dolby do not charge application & licensing fee.. but charges royalty per unit item sold to market.. remember that the encoding is lossless~ but in the end the decoder and its hardware play the most vital role to accurately reproduce. Nothing is fixed, everything has tolerance~ there are many difference: major ones are such as THD+N vs freq, THD+N vs level, SNR, dynamic range compression, frequency response with/without emphasis, dialogue normalization, downmixing coefficient, speaker remapping. only those possess high quality audio system and a keen hearing can discern until the very detail~ dont forget the speaker. |
|
|
Dec 6 2010, 02:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
183 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Perak
|
QUOTE(choontoy @ Dec 4 2010, 06:22 PM) Analog Stereo Untouch Audio signal, superior than any audio codec.  |
| Change to: |  0.0170sec
 0.59
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:26 PM |
Quote