QUOTE(killdavid @ Mar 26 2012, 04:08 PM)
I guess watching Battle Royale first kinda stole the thunder away from The Hunger Games.
i think you got the wrong idea of the
thunder killdavid meant
QUOTE(Eisenmeteor @ Mar 26 2012, 06:03 PM)
Not exactly, though set in the future the story behind the games is different.
Battle Royale: Social problems rise among youth,resulted in the government allow the Battle Royale thing to happen
Hunger Games: 13 Districts tried to rebel, they failed then Panem have the games annually to remind the districts of their rebellion would cause two kids from each of their area to die each year. For Panem, its entertainment, for the 12 districts its not.
both based on dictatorship, survival death games and what the audience gets or feel from watching both movie.
QUOTE(n00b13 @ Mar 27 2012, 02:21 AM)
There's something people seem to have missed in this movie, especially those who wondered why Katniss fell for Peeta so fast.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
She didn't. She never did. She only cares for him when there's a chance they could both survive the Games. But her "romance" with him was faked all along, just to make them popular with the viewers and get help from sponsors. It all boils down to the end when Haymitch tells her to say "I just couldn't imagine living without him", and she dutifully does just that in front of the cameras.
Early on, Peeta says he wants to prove that they don't own him, that he is still himself - and Katniss replies, "I can't afford to think like that." And by the end, when she says what she's been told to say, her smile is utterly fake. She won the Hunger Games and survived, but she is no longer herself.
the movie doesn't have a nice ending i mentioned earlier because it leaves the audiences that didn't read the books nor expecting a trilogy with