QUOTE(seantang @ Apr 2 2011, 09:53 AM)
That really depends.
If it's a very technical field, where the masters' coursework or research is directly relevant to the job, then yes... a full time course is better regarded than part time or distance learning. Same for investment banks who want to hire MBA associates. They usually won't go for part timers or distance learners.
For MNCs however, they are really not that concerned about how you obtained that masters. In fact, delaying your entry into the working world or leaving your current job for a couple years to do a full time course - might indicate escapism from work pressure/environment or give the impression that you took a full time course because you were not very successful in your job before that.
And let's say... if a hiring manager compares 2 people who have completed their bachelors' degree for 10 years, where:
(a) has 10 years full time work experience, got promoted 5 times (every 2 years) during that period to Level 5 (managing a $1B business) and has a distance learning MBA that took 4 years,
/vs.
(b) has 8 years full time work experience, got promoted 4 times (every 2 years) during that period to Level 4 (managing a $0.5B business) and has a full time MBA that took 2 years,
If you are the hiring manager who needs to hire someone for a Level 6 job to manage a new $2B business, who would you pick?
I'd immediately pick the guy who has experience managing the larger business, and can handle loads of pressure in a complex situation ie.multi-task (work & study at the same time) and deliver ie. be successful at both.
IB and top tier consulting firms encourage their employees to pursue MBA full-time. Recruitment for associates is primarily done under job placement or career roadshow in campus before graduation.If it's a very technical field, where the masters' coursework or research is directly relevant to the job, then yes... a full time course is better regarded than part time or distance learning. Same for investment banks who want to hire MBA associates. They usually won't go for part timers or distance learners.
For MNCs however, they are really not that concerned about how you obtained that masters. In fact, delaying your entry into the working world or leaving your current job for a couple years to do a full time course - might indicate escapism from work pressure/environment or give the impression that you took a full time course because you were not very successful in your job before that.
And let's say... if a hiring manager compares 2 people who have completed their bachelors' degree for 10 years, where:
(a) has 10 years full time work experience, got promoted 5 times (every 2 years) during that period to Level 5 (managing a $1B business) and has a distance learning MBA that took 4 years,
/vs.
(b) has 8 years full time work experience, got promoted 4 times (every 2 years) during that period to Level 4 (managing a $0.5B business) and has a full time MBA that took 2 years,
If you are the hiring manager who needs to hire someone for a Level 6 job to manage a new $2B business, who would you pick?
I'd immediately pick the guy who has experience managing the larger business, and can handle loads of pressure in a complex situation ie.multi-task (work & study at the same time) and deliver ie. be successful at both.
As MNC recruitment appetite is not part of my forte, I concur either distance/part of full time learning will not dictate your employment chances.
Nicky is trying to match his opportunity and aspiration. I presume the reason he landed himself in such a contradictory situation is because of pursuing Masters w/o having job experience. This is extremely common quagmire for fresh Master grad. Ivy leagues have been trying to prevent such situation by enforcing a certain amount of working experience before enrolling with your GMAT/GRE score.
Added on April 2, 2011, 2:43 pm
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Apr 2 2011, 09:13 AM)
There is absolutely nothing wrong with part-time masters. In fact, they should be favored compared to full timer if both passed with distinction. The market doesn't see it this way (but that is strictly ambiguous and depends on what market you are in). I am coming from the finance industry perspective and equipping oneself with MBA, not technical or specific Masters.It is not about inferiority or superiority. More on market perception and industry unique circumstance.
To substantiate this:- ever wonder why Sg govt agencies will have check boxes on Master/Degree part-time or full-time for any application that will consider your academic background?
This post has been edited by keelim: Apr 2 2011, 02:46 PM
Apr 2 2011, 02:37 PM

Quote
0.7775sec
0.13
6 queries
GZIP Disabled