Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Plasma or LCD

views
     
SUSMatrix
post Dec 7 2010, 10:17 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(j_h0059 @ Nov 30 2010, 06:52 PM)
LG 42" 200 hz only rm2899...Sharp n LG 100hz only around rm2400-2600. Yes, it's LCD
*
Those 200Hz and 100Hz does nothing. Absolute no difference. Only those like Philips HD NaturalMotion, new Sharp LED with 100Hz(not the old 2k plus LCD) and SONY motionflow shows real improvement.

Samsung and LG 100/200/xxx Hz does nothing.


Added on December 7, 2010, 10:19 pm
QUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Dec 4 2010, 06:55 PM)
i read somewhere ppl said Hz is just marketing stuff..
*
Nope. Depends on which brand and model. Those that works, really superb...better than watching at Cinema!!!

This post has been edited by Matrix: Dec 7 2010, 10:19 PM
SUSMatrix
post Dec 8 2010, 07:31 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(liez @ Dec 8 2010, 12:51 AM)
I thought plasma is better than LCD and there is no more argument bout that??? Ppl told me LCD runs by liquid thus it moves slower than plasma which act as a normal TV but just crystal clear.... in terms of quality, resolution, clarity....plasma wins everything rite?
*
Individual preference. I dun like plasma. If got money, i buy full array LED like those new Sharps.
SUSMatrix
post Dec 17 2010, 09:41 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(jacktan1888 @ Dec 17 2010, 03:41 AM)
watch astro on lcd , picture not nice.
*
Why until this day and age, still got people expect SD transmission to look nice on a FullHD LCD panel?? doh.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0425sec    0.89    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 06:24 AM