Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Plasma or LCD
|
SUSMatrix
|
Dec 7 2010, 10:17 PM
|
|
QUOTE(j_h0059 @ Nov 30 2010, 06:52 PM) LG 42" 200 hz only rm2899...Sharp n LG 100hz only around rm2400-2600. Yes, it's LCD Those 200Hz and 100Hz does nothing. Absolute no difference. Only those like Philips HD NaturalMotion, new Sharp LED with 100Hz(not the old 2k plus LCD) and SONY motionflow shows real improvement. Samsung and LG 100/200/xxx Hz does nothing. Added on December 7, 2010, 10:19 pmQUOTE(maryjane9996 @ Dec 4 2010, 06:55 PM) i read somewhere ppl said Hz is just marketing stuff.. Nope. Depends on which brand and model. Those that works, really superb...better than watching at Cinema!!! This post has been edited by Matrix: Dec 7 2010, 10:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Dec 8 2010, 07:31 AM
|
|
QUOTE(liez @ Dec 8 2010, 12:51 AM) I thought plasma is better than LCD and there is no more argument bout that??? Ppl told me LCD runs by liquid thus it moves slower than plasma which act as a normal TV but just crystal clear.... in terms of quality, resolution, clarity....plasma wins everything rite? Individual preference. I dun like plasma. If got money, i buy full array LED like those new Sharps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Dec 17 2010, 09:41 AM
|
|
QUOTE(jacktan1888 @ Dec 17 2010, 03:41 AM) watch astro on lcd , picture not nice. Why until this day and age, still got people expect SD transmission to look nice on a FullHD LCD panel??
|
|
|
|
|