QUOTE(wanfaris @ Nov 28 2010, 10:59 PM)
I'm Stay In iTune Playback iTunes Vs Winamp ..?, Which is Better In Perfomance...???
Playback iTunes Vs Winamp ..?, Which is Better In Perfomance...???
|
|
Nov 28 2010, 11:55 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
68 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 03:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,697 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: A Place Where God And Master Of TroubleMaker Exist |
|
|
|
Nov 29 2010, 04:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,242 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Cheras |
if you have nothing to do with Apple (ALAC, aac, Ipod, Ipad, QuickTime, MacBook etc.) stay away from ITunes, it is not worth all the hassle and time. Furthermore, ITunes now is stray too far from it original goal as media player. It is now more like a shopping catalog.
|
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 01:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
115 posts Joined: May 2010 |
|
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 01:57 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,500 posts Joined: Apr 2010 From: Bintulu, Sarawak |
foobar2000!!
|
|
|
Dec 1 2010, 02:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 12:33 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
228 posts Joined: May 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2010, 02:03 PM
|
|
VIP
16,825 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Siberia |
QUOTE(inspiron 14 @ Nov 25 2010, 10:43 AM) Hye, 1by1As Per Topic, Which Is The Best Between "iTune" And "Winamp" Which Is The Best In speed (Use Lower Ram and Cpu) Kindly Please Reply Here...Thx! http://mpesch3.de1.cc/1by1.html |
|
|
Dec 8 2010, 02:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Jun 2010 |
i prefer itunes >> winnamp
|
|
|
Dec 10 2010, 02:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Heritage Waterfront City |
so far never try i-tunes yet..
downloading now.. btw, for now winamp still owned im using it for many years now.. jet audio also not bad. vlc IMHO only good for mkv movies and got volume 50% boost from normal. thw control suck thou~. |
|
|
Dec 11 2010, 03:58 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
4 posts Joined: Dec 2010 From: A320 Cockpit |
foobar2000
|
|
|
Dec 11 2010, 04:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,789 posts Joined: Jul 2010 From: Silicon Valley |
Using ITunes now XD Dropped my Windows Media Player
|
|
|
Dec 11 2010, 10:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Heritage Waterfront City |
so far using i-tune feel nothing difference from winamp?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 06:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,439 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
another lightweight mp3 player..
http://www.vuplayer.com/vuplayer.php or refer this link... just give it try... This post has been edited by wanfaris: Dec 13 2010, 06:15 AM |
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 02:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
944 posts Joined: Oct 2010 |
Some has suggested fb2k, and I, am suggesting it again.
Fb2k. It's by far the best player I've ever used. |
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 08:23 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,735 posts Joined: Mar 2006 From: Malaysia - Swindon Town |
QUOTE(Angel of Deth @ Nov 29 2010, 04:27 PM) if you have nothing to do with Apple (ALAC, aac, Ipod, Ipad, QuickTime, MacBook etc.) stay away from ITunes, it is not worth all the hassle and time. Furthermore, ITunes now is stray too far from it original goal as media player. It is now more like a shopping catalog. i believe this is the best answer.. ya iTunes doesnt look like a media player to me, more like poisoning u to buy songs from them but hell, i know most of u listen to |
|
|
Dec 13 2010, 11:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,372 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Heritage Waterfront City |
no wonder then..lol
|
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 12:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,301 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: android#[me@linuxbox me]$ my_location |
lol, i think itune running slow for normal computer
|
|
|
Dec 14 2010, 02:31 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
180 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(EroS @ Nov 26 2010, 01:07 AM) simple.iTunes have more friendly user interface, and seems to have a pretty good equaliser. but uses more ram. while winamp offers pretty good quality, less ram but looks sucky compared to itunes. so..iTunes for me. |
|
|
Dec 15 2010, 12:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,745 posts Joined: Aug 2010 From: Kuala Lumpur |
winamp for use, friendly user, less resource consume.
|
| Change to: | 0.0256sec
0.41
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 01:32 AM |