1.) Providing low quality materials
2.) Providing bad workmanship
3.) Promote the use of gangster renovation
4.) Frequent delays in project completion.
5.) Bad management.
6.) Unprofessionalism.
7.) Bad cashflow.
I know Talam fits the above criteria... who else?
Added on November 21, 2010, 12:45 pm
QUOTE(Hansel @ Nov 21 2010, 11:10 AM)
Let's not debate too much on the projects and so on, just be sincere and put down the names of the developers who have made their reputations as such. It's up to people to judge, just like if anybody does not agre with the two names above, they can ignore them and just go ahead to buy their projects. Nobody is stopping them, it's a free country.
Anyway, I believed the above listing will not be that useful anymore, because these names are not selling their projects under such names anymore.
Especially one of them - I read somewhere else this morning that one of the above names will be going under other parties to sell their projects, can't go under the parent company name or their subsidiary names anymore.
So, BUYERS BEWARE.
Don't blame the Gov't for not helping you in future if you get into abandonment or stalling problems.
I think the name of the subsidiary companies or the other "parties" should also be placed in the list.Anyway, I believed the above listing will not be that useful anymore, because these names are not selling their projects under such names anymore.
Especially one of them - I read somewhere else this morning that one of the above names will be going under other parties to sell their projects, can't go under the parent company name or their subsidiary names anymore.
So, BUYERS BEWARE.
Don't blame the Gov't for not helping you in future if you get into abandonment or stalling problems.
This post has been edited by Drian: Nov 21 2010, 12:45 PM