QUOTE(ShenWoo @ Nov 23 2010, 03:28 PM)
To exploit the 2X crop, making it cheaper than buying the equivalent lens on other, less smaller sensor size DSLR. Of course its not practically on a range finder camera, I'm talking about telephoto lens options in general for the m4/3 which after a year only start to surface.
But shouldn't small=less material=less cost?
Judging by the line up and past products, almost all the prices had remain consistent with a minor drop of price. Furthermore some of them are mostly plastic body, but can cost as much as the medium grade lens on the 4/3 system. Best examples are the primes, with prices fetching at least 1k and beyond.
That's sure alot to pay for downsizing stuff.
I think your concept a bit wrong di.
Yes...One of the "benefit" of 2X crop = smaller lens
This does not equal to cheaper lens.
Material cost is only a teeny weeny part of the cost of a product ler... like a computer cpu... the silicon only cost kacang putih but billions are needed for R&D and building the fab.
How many cpu's they need to sell to get back the billions of dollars?
Same thing with these m4/3 lens. The best selling m43's are targeted towards casual users that don't go beyond the kit lenses so the total market volume is small.