QUOTE(il0ve51 @ Mar 14 2011, 12:35 PM)
yesterday went fotokem fair... i walk in to see GF2 but the seller keep on say not worth getting the gf2 he say g2 is better and is good for long run as compare.
from his booth, the package he compare is below
GF2
Body,
14mm or 14-42mm
Bag
8gb memory
cleaning kit
around 100cm tripod
@RM2400
G2
14-42mm
45-200mm
Bag
2x 8gb memory
cleaning kit
around 100cm tripod
@2499
he say g2 have around similar function as except 720p video, lightweight and other not so important function.
anyone can enlight me on which 1 more worth?
if possible state some of the pros and cons
btw i am newbie, this is my 1st camera
To put it this way.... sensor wise, both GF2 and G2 sports the same thing so image quality is similiar. You do get a build-in electronic viewfinder which is useful for bright days outdoor and shooting with long lens for stability.
So the G2 is also more ergonomic which means that it has to look like a bonzai dslr.
Then when you look outside m43, these "advantages" becomes its problem as an entry dslr like Canon 550D, Nikon D3100 or even the Sony A33 performs noticeably better for more or less the same price.
And those DSLR's are bigger but like ~200grams heavier niah. Either ways have to put in a bag... and 200grams in a bag is not noticeable.
So depend on how you see things.. my dua sen are:
If touchscreen is a "feature" --> I'll get a Iphone 4
If want pocket friendly --> I'll get a S95
If want m43 --> I'll get a E-PL2 or GF1+20mm
If want everything --> I'll get an entry DSLR.