mengapa kita patut menghindari peperangan?
-SPM Thread Version Four-, Its never too late! :)
-SPM Thread Version Four-, Its never too late! :)
|
|
Nov 25 2010, 12:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
mengapa kita patut menghindari peperangan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 25 2010, 12:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Berdasarkan kajian anda, apakah tujuan pertubuhan Melayu mengadakan Kongres Melayu pada tahun 1939 dan 1940?
|
|
|
Nov 25 2010, 12:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Berdasarkan kajian anda, apakah tujuan pertubuhan Melayu mengadakan Kongres Melayu pada tahun 1939 dan 1940?
-Membincangkan soal kemunduran orang Melayu dalam pendidikan dan ekonomi -Membincangkan layanan pilih kasih British kepada anak negeri |
|
|
Nov 25 2010, 12:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Nov 25 2010, 06:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Pada pendapat anda,mgpa phak brtsh brusaha myekat org mlayu tnm gtah?
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
It is 41.12. I got it. You have to cut the base BCD into half. Lets call mid point of BC as T. So it will form a triangle ATD. AD is 8cm and TD is root of 84cm. Then, tan ATD = 8/(root of 84). Hence solve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 01:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
[quote=Inspiralution,Nov 26 2010, 11:41 AM]
guys,how to do this?i got 38.xxx but answer given is D » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « It is 41.12. I got it. You have to cut the base BCD into half. Lets call mid point of BC as T. So it will form a triangle ATD. AD is 8cm and TD is root of 84cm. Then, tan ATD = 8/(root of 84). Hence solve. |
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 01:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(ganick5461 @ Nov 26 2010, 01:30 PM) (10^2 - 4^2) = 84cmBoth ABD and ACD are right-angled triangles as A is vertically above D and BD=CD=10cm. This shows that base BDC is an isosceles triangle. Thus you need to cut BDC into half to form a right-angled triangle so that you can obtain length of TD. Using TD as adjacent side and AD as the opposite side, you'll be able to calculate angle ATD. I apologize if this sounds complicated and confusing, I advise you to sketch the triangles for better understanding. This post has been edited by henry930821: Nov 26 2010, 01:48 PM |
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 02:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 02:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(556611 @ Nov 26 2010, 02:26 PM) ∠ABC is not a right angle? hmmm..this question is kinda tricky haha.. Nope ∠ABC is not a right angle. Since A is vertically above D, therefore ABC has to be an isosceles triangle as well since BDC is already an isosceles triangle as BD is equal to DC.Added on November 26, 2010, 2:28 pmanyone here has terengganu 2010 trial 's bio paper skema? This post has been edited by henry930821: Nov 26 2010, 02:40 PM |
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 02:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 03:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 04:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Oh my.. Seriously?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26 2010, 05:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(SkyHermit @ Nov 26 2010, 05:12 PM) fb are rumors for me. I can go to fb and write 'SPM abolished' But it'll be different if you see people start saying that they saw it on news this afternoon.Some of my friends saw and keep on posting on their profiles. This is how rumor spreads. 1 to 10. 10 to 100. 100 to 1000 and to infinity |
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 10:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(556611 @ Nov 27 2010, 02:04 AM) This should be the correct way of doing..Added on November 27, 2010, 10:29 am QUOTE(yoyoman @ Nov 27 2010, 01:30 AM) Lol this is wrong. If you're doing that way, by subbing in f(x) in directly, the correct working should be h(x-2) = x^2+3x+1 but not h(x)-2=x^2+3x+1 because f(x) represents (x-2) not (x)-2. Note that h is a function, that maps (x-2) to x^2+3x+1.The answer given by the answer scheme is wrong. It should be h(x)=x^2+7x+11 Refer to 556611's working for the correct solution. This post has been edited by henry930821: Nov 27 2010, 10:33 AM |
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 11:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(556611 @ Nov 27 2010, 10:45 AM) lol i did that question for like 6 times and i can't find my error. This question is from Perak trial..=) But I feel that the skema has a few mistakes... Have you read my reply? |
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(0172584519 @ Nov 27 2010, 11:32 AM) No. Parallel vectors may or may not have the same magnitude. If vectors are parallel, one of the vectors is the scalar multiple of the other vector. If vector a is parallel to vector b, a//b therefore a=kb with k as a scalar. If a = 3b, therefore a//b with the same direction.This post has been edited by henry930821: Nov 27 2010, 11:42 AM |
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 01:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
QUOTE(:+:DarreN:+: @ Nov 27 2010, 12:58 PM) there's a trick to that. if your calculator is 570, you can press Mode and select "Rad." that way, when you calculate angles, the values are in radians. You forgot about the other explanation. The buoyant force can also be more than the weight of object. That causes the object to float on water as well.yes. this also means that buoyant force = weight of fluid displaced = weight of object This post has been edited by henry930821: Nov 27 2010, 01:20 PM |
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 01:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
Guys.. If the question asks, 'namakan pertubuhan yang dianggotai oleh negara kita.' Can we just answer NAM or we have to write in full which is Pergerakan Negara-Negara Berkecuali?
|
|
|
Nov 27 2010, 01:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
294 posts Joined: Dec 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0384sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 08:21 PM |